Thanks Renjie for landing the page and others for the review!
Merry Christmas!
|
-+-
A
/=\ /\ /\ ___ _ __ _ __ __ __
i/ O \i / \/ \ / _ \| '__|| '__|\ \ / /
/=====\ / /\ /\ \| __/| | | | \ \/ /
/ i \ \ \ \/ / / \___/|_| |_| \ /
i/ O * O \i / /
/=========\ __ __ /_/ _
/ * * \ \ \/ / /\ /\ __ _ ____ | |
i/ O i O \i \ / __ / \/ \ / _` |/ ___\ |_|
/=============\ / \ |__| / /\ /\ \| (_| |\___ \ _
/ O i O \ /_/\_\ \ \ \/ / / \__,_|\____/ |_|
i/ * O O * \i
/=================\
|___|
Manu
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:52 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Thanks everyone for the review and discussion, we have status page landed:
> https://iceberg.apache.org/status/
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:04 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>> Sorry for delay, here is the pr:
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11772
>>
>> The status may be inaccurate, maintainers of different libraries please
>> help to review and comment on it.
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 3:12 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Renjie! Happy to review and help fill out the matrix! :)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Kevin Liu
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:51 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for everyone's comments. I think we reached agreement on the
>>>> design, and I'll send a pr for it.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:13 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LGTM. Thanks Renjie!
>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:38 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with
>>>>>> the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Updated the doc, please take a look.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > My only comment is probably to use versions instead of check marks,
>>>>>> but all good :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In current approach we will write the version of each library in the
>>>>>> beginning of the page, which seems easier to maintain than per version
>>>>>> per
>>>>>> feature. What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the idea. My only comment is probably to use versions instead
>>>>>>> of check marks, but all good :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:33 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Sounds like a great idea to me
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to
>>>>>>> propose to maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please
>>>>>>> refer to this doc. Welcome to join the discussion and comment on it!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
