Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

Thanks everyone for taking the time to vote! The vote passed with 8 binding votes and 5 non-binding votes. Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 21 apr 2025 om 05:18 schreef Renjie Liu : > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Honah J. wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 17:4

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 17:42 xianjin wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 17:42 xianjin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

[VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1(binding) Yufei On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:50 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Steve Zhang > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >> >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Steve Zhang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh wrote: > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:33 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:36 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks >>> S

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:36 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (Bind) >>> >>> On T

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> +1 (Bind) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (Bind) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >> >> Thanks ! >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong >> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) Thanks ! Regards JB On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of the > source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a > multi-argume

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (Bind) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) > > Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encodin

[VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

Hi everyone, A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of the source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a multi-argument transform. In short, use source-id in the case of a single argu