Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Sorry for the delay on 1.7.2 here. After talking with JB, I had the pleasure of fixing the licenses . PTAL :) Kind regards, Fokko Op do 20 feb 2025 om 10:06 schreef Hussein Awala : > > Do you still nee

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

> Do you still need 1.7.2 or 1.8.0/1.8.1 is good enough for you ? If 1.8.1 will be released soon, that would be great. We prefer not to use the first release for a minor version in production and wait for at least a patch release, but 1.7.X is completely broken. On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:30 AM E

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Let's go then :) I'm happy to resume the process here :) Regards JB On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > > I think we should still do 1.7.2 and not leave it in a broken state. > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi Hussein >> >> We we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

I think we should still do 1.7.2 and not leave it in a broken state. On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Hussein > > We were focusing on 1.8.x. > > Do you still need 1.7.2 or 1.8.0/1.8.1 is good enough for you ? > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:23 PM H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi Hussein We were focusing on 1.8.x. Do you still need 1.7.2 or 1.8.0/1.8.1 is good enough for you ? Regards JB On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:23 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Is there any intention to proceed with the release or is it completely > cancelled? > > Regards, > Hussein >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi folks, Is there any intention to proceed with the release or is it completely cancelled? Regards, Hussein On Wednesday, January 29, 2025, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi folks, > > in order to merge the LICENSE/NOTICE improvement on our binary > artifacts, I cancel this vote for rc0. > > A

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi folks, in order to merge the LICENSE/NOTICE improvement on our binary artifacts, I cancel this vote for rc0. As soon as the PRs will be merged, I will propose rc1 to vote. Regards JB On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I propose that we release t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

I'm also -1 until we get #12095 backported to 1.7.x. We don't want to release artifacts when we know parts of the NOTICE(s) need to be corrected. Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Sorry (ag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Sorry (again, it's a long day): I meant this PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12095 On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Just to be clear: we are working on new changes on NOTICE/LICENSE that > would be great to include in 1.7.x. > > See https://github.com/apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hey folks, I'm having trouble running this test successfully. I see that there was already an attempt to fix it but this is not included in the 1.7.x branch. Furthermore, running this test against the `main` branch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Just to be clear: we are working on new changes on NOTICE/LICENSE that would be great to include in 1.7.x. See https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/903 I think it would be great to have this for 1.8.0 but also for 1.7.2. That's why I voted -1 :) Thoughts ? Regards JB On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

-1 (non binding) I actually did a change that we should "partially revert": I changed the NOTICE to use bundle name, which is not optimal. I propose to cancel this rc0 to create a rc1 fixing name in NOTICE. Sorry about that. Regards JB On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksums, license, built and ran some tests locally. On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:50 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > +1 (verified sigs/checksums/license/ran tests locally) > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:00 AM Yuya Ebihara wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Chec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (verified sigs/checksums/license/ran tests locally) On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:00 AM Yuya Ebihara wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked green CI on Trino https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/24814 > > BR, > Yuya > > On 2025/01/28 04:52:39 Cheng Pan wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Pass int

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (non-binding) Checked green CI on Trino https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/24814 BR, Yuya On 2025/01/28 04:52:39 Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Pass integration test with Apache Kyuubi > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > > > On Jan 28, 2025, at 07:13, Russell Spitzer > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (non-binding) Pass integration test with Apache Kyuubi Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Jan 28, 2025, at 07:13, Russell Spitzer wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Checked licensing and sha and gpg sig > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: >> +1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (binding) Checked licensing and sha and gpg sig On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran signature/checksum/license: > > *➜ **Desktop* gpg --verify apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz.asc > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz' > > gpg: S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

+1 (binding) Ran signature/checksum/license: *➜ **Desktop* gpg --verify apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Sun Jan 26 21:23:14 2025 CET gpg:using RSA key FCD3779E399C53D995FC82A35171BA3E54493550 gpg:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi Manu We have some "duplicated" issues on the 1.7.2 milestone. For instance, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11812 and https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11817 are the same but only the 11817 is for 1.7.x. Same for https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11954 and https://github.com/ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi JB, Thanks for driving the release. It looks the 1.7.2 milestone has more changes than diffs between 1.7.2-rc0 and 1.7.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi, as 1.7.x is "broken", 1.7.2 makes sense. 1.8.0 brings new features. Regards JB On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 6:37 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > > Hi JB and Fokko, > > Since 1.8.0 RC is planned for tomorrow[1], > Just wondering if we really need 1.7.2? > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/wvz5sd7pmh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Ok. Thanks for the details. On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hey Ajantha, > > As mentioned in the 1.7.2 DISCUSS thread, we don't want to leave the 1.7.x > version in a broken state. Since the 1.8.x ships with new features, it will > require more thorough testing. I stil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hey Ajantha, As mentioned in the 1.7.2 DISCUSS thread, we don't want to leave the 1.7.x version in a broken state. Since the 1.8.x ships with new features, it will require more thorough testing. I still think it would be good to get 1.7.2 to the public ASAP. Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 27 jan 2025

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi JB and Fokko, Since 1.8.0 RC is planned for tomorrow[1], Just wondering if we really need 1.7.2? [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/wvz5sd7pmh5ww1yqhsxpt1kwf993276j - Ajantha On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I propose that we release the follo

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 rc0

Hi everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 release. The commit ID is c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0 * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0 * https://g