Hi Hussein

We were focusing on 1.8.x.

Do you still need 1.7.2 or 1.8.0/1.8.1 is good enough for you ?

Regards
JB

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:23 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there any intention to proceed with the release or is it completely 
> cancelled?
>
> Regards,
> Hussein
>
> On Wednesday, January 29, 2025, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> in order to merge the LICENSE/NOTICE improvement on our binary
>> artifacts, I cancel this vote for rc0.
>>
>> As soon as the PRs will be merged, I will propose rc1 to vote.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>> > Iceberg 1.7.2 release.
>> >
>> > The commit ID is c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c
>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0
>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0
>> > * 
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c
>> >
>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0
>> >
>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >
>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository URL 
>> > is:
>> > * https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1180/
>> >
>> > For the changes, checkout the Milestone:
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/52?closed=1
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test. Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.2
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>> >
>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>> > encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are
>> > 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Regards
>> > JB & Fokko

Reply via email to