+1 (binding) Ran signature/checksum/license:
*➜ **Desktop* gpg --verify apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Sun Jan 26 21:23:14 2025 CET gpg: using RSA key FCD3779E399C53D995FC82A35171BA3E54493550 gpg: Good signature from "Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>" [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: FCD3 779E 399C 53D9 95FC 82A3 5171 BA3E 5449 3550 *➜ **Desktop* shasum -a 512 --check apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz.sha512 apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz: OK *➜* *Desktop* tar xzf apache-iceberg-1.7.2.tar.gz *➜ **Desktop* cd apache-iceberg-1.7.2 *➜ **apache-iceberg-1.7.2* ./dev/check-license Attempting to fetch rat ERROR: Ignored 0 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty lines. RAT checks passed. More importantly, at PyIceberg we're able to bump to 1.7.2 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1581/>. We're still at 1.6.0 because of #11858 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11858>. Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 27 jan 2025 om 16:15 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi Manu > > We have some "duplicated" issues on the 1.7.2 milestone. > For instance, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11812 and > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11817 are the same but only the > 11817 is for 1.7.x. > Same for https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11954 and > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11971. > > That explains the "gap". > > Let me update the milestone for issues targeting 1.8.0 (not 1.7.2). > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:46 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi JB, > > > > Thanks for driving the release. It looks the 1.7.2 milestone has more > changes than diffs between 1.7.2-rc0 and 1.7.1. > > > > Regards, > > Manu > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:36 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> as 1.7.x is "broken", 1.7.2 makes sense. 1.8.0 brings new features. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 6:37 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi JB and Fokko, > >> > > >> > Since 1.8.0 RC is planned for tomorrow[1], > >> > Just wondering if we really need 1.7.2? > >> > > >> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/wvz5sd7pmh5ww1yqhsxpt1kwf993276j > >> > > >> > - Ajantha > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi everyone, > >> >> > >> >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache > >> >> Iceberg 1.7.2 release. > >> >> > >> >> The commit ID is c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c > >> >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0 > >> >> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0 > >> >> * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c2105b2634becf68b3fdabd0ee6fb0b6e93d4f0c > >> >> > >> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > >> >> * > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc0 > >> >> > >> >> You can find the KEYS file here: > >> >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > >> >> > >> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven > repository URL is: > >> >> * > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1180/ > >> >> > >> >> For the changes, checkout the Milestone: > >> >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/52?closed=1 > >> >> > >> >> Please download, verify, and test. Please vote in the next 72 hours. > >> >> > >> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 > >> >> [ ] +0 > >> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > >> >> > >> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are > >> >> encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there > are > >> >> 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Regards > >> >> JB & Fokko >
