Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Apr 18, 2025, at 1:29 PM, huaxin gao wrote: > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 17:42 xianjin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

[VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:19 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 RC0

Thanks JB for fixing the license and notice versions. I think we should have an ASF level project for gradle and maven plugin that can help all apache projects to handle the notice and versions easily. And a huge +1 to Ryan's suggestion

Re: [Discuss] Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 release

Thanks JB for fixing the license and notice versions. I think we should have an ASF level project for gradle and maven plugin that can help all apache projects to handle the notice and versions easily. And a huge +1 to Ryan's suggestion

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1(binding) Yufei On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:50 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Steve Zhang > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >> >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:20 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 1:16 PM Prashant Singh > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Best, >> Prashant Singh >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Yufei Gu wrote: >> >>> +1(binding) >>>

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 1:16 PM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Best, > Prashant Singh > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1(binding) >> Yufei >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ron Ortloff wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Fri, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant Singh On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1(binding) > Yufei > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ron Ortloff wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 a

Re: [DISCUSS] Table Identifiers in Iceberg View Spec

Hi Everyone, Looking forward to keeping up the momentum and closing out the MV spec as well. I’m hoping we can proceed to a vote next week. Here is a summary in case that helps. The proposal outlines a strategy for handling table identifiers in Iceberg view metadata, with the goal of ensuring cor

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1(binding) Yufei On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ron Ortloff wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:45 PM Ron Ortloff wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for suppo

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for supporting lower >> and upper bounds on Variant fields. Summary of the change: >> >> T

[VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

Hi all, I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for supporting lower and upper bounds on Variant fields. Summary of the change: The writer determines which fields to collect bounds for a Variant column. Field bounds are stored as serialized Variant objects, where each key is a normal

[Announce] Seattle Apache Iceberg Community Meetup 5/6

Hey folks, We have another Iceberg community meetup coming up on *May 6* in *Seattle* at the Databricks Bellevue office! Please register at https://lu.ma/njczsmlu. The Call for Proposals is open until 4/30. The submission link can be found on the luma page. Looking forward to seeing you there! T

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Steve Zhang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Spec Update: Variant Field Lower/Upper Bounds

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for supporting lower > and upper bounds on Variant fields. Summary of the change: > > The writer determines which fields to collect bounds for a Variant column. > Field

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Apr 18, 2025, at 12:53 AM, Prashant Singh wrote: > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

Thanks for raising this Fokko! I went through all the commits since the 0.9.0 release . Here are some PRs I think would be good to include as part of 0.9.1 https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1741 https://github.com

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 Op vr 18 apr 2025 om 08:09 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > Le jeu. 17 avr. 2025 à 01:08, Ryan Blue a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I’d like to start a vote to incorporate the spec changes in PR 12781 >> . >

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:33 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:36 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks >>> S