Thanks JB for fixing the license and notice versions. I think we should have an ASF level project for gradle and maven plugin that can help all apache projects to handle the notice and versions easily.
And a huge +1 to Ryan's suggestion <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12767#issuecomment-2802083422> for removing the version numbers for ASF licenses. So, we don't have to update for every version bump. We will do a new RC, once PR#12835 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12835> is merged (Fix related to variant bound serialization). - Ajantha On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 4:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Ah yes agree: I don’t want to block 1.9.0 release. I was surprising to not > seeing the distributions. We can include it for next release. > > > Le mar. 15 avr. 2025 à 19:40, Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> I agree we should be distributing them, but I wouldn't block 1.9.0 for it >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Russell, I remember this issue. >>> >>> My question is: >>> 1. As we build the distributions (main and hive), do we want to >>> publish as it is (and let the users extend) >>> 2. If 1 is not good enough, should we still build the distributions ? >>> >>> Just wondering ;) Personally, I think we should distribute the >>> distributions we build, and users can start from these distributions >>> (my $0.01 ;) ). >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 6:39 PM Russell Spitzer >>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > We had a ticket about improving kafka connect distribution, >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12507 because the current docs >>> require you to build your own kafka-connect zip. >>> > >>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 8:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Another point that I saw: the kafka-connect runtime distributions >>> >> (hive and main) are not published (not on Maven Staging repository, >>> >> neither on dist). >>> >> I guess we want to publish these distributions right ? >>> >> >>> >> Regards >>> >> JB >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:26 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi Everyone, >>> >> > >>> >> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>> Iceberg 1.9.0 release. >>> >> > >>> >> > The commit ID is e56ec11215e7b9fec6ffd1ea435e008852454db0 >>> >> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc0 >>> >> > * >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc0 >>> >> > * >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/e56ec11215e7b9fec6ffd1ea435e008852454db0 >>> >> > >>> >> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>> >> > * >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc0 >>> >> > >>> >> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>> >> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>> >> > >>> >> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>> repository URL is: >>> >> > * >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1188/ >>> >> > >>> >> > Please download, verify, and test. >>> >> > >>> >> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>> >> > >>> >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 >>> >> > [ ] +0 >>> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>> >> > >>> >> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>> are encouraged to cast >>> >> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>> votes and more binding >>> >> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>> >> > >>> >> > Special thanks to Eduard and Fokko for helping me with the >>> artifacts upload. >>> >> > >>> >> > - Ajantha >>> >>
