+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:20 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 1:16 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> Best,
>> Prashant Singh
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1(binding)
>>> Yufei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ron Ortloff <ortlof...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for supporting
>>>>>> lower and upper bounds on Variant fields. Summary of the change:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The writer determines which fields to collect bounds for a Variant
>>>>>> column. Field bounds are stored as serialized Variant objects, where each
>>>>>> key is a normalized JSON path identifying a field, and each value is the
>>>>>> corresponding lower or upper bound.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is an example of a bound value:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "$['event_type']": 10,
>>>>>> "$['location']['latitude']": 37.338207,
>>>>>> "$['tags']": "action"
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a look at the PR
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12658>. and vote in the
>>>>>> next 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the spec update
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aihua
>>>>>>
>>>>>
