+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 1:16 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1(binding)
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ron Ortloff <ortlof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:47 AM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to initiate a vote to include a spec update for supporting
>>>>> lower and upper bounds on Variant fields. Summary of the change:
>>>>>
>>>>> The writer determines which fields to collect bounds for a Variant
>>>>> column. Field bounds are stored as serialized Variant objects, where each
>>>>> key is a normalized JSON path identifying a field, and each value is the
>>>>> corresponding lower or upper bound.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is an example of a bound value:
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>> "$['event_type']": 10,
>>>>> "$['location']['latitude']": 37.338207,
>>>>> "$['tags']": "action"
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a look at the PR
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12658>. and vote in the next
>>>>> 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the spec update
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Aihua
>>>>>
>>>>
