[VOTE][RESULT] Release HttpComponents HttpCore 5.2.5 based on RC1

2024-07-02 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
The vote to release HttpComponents HttpCore 5.2.5 based on RC1 has passed with the following results +1 (4 binding votes in total) Gary Gregory * Ryan Schmitt * Arturo Bernal * Oleg Kalnichevski * no other votes * binding votes Original voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ssj5o7h

[PR] Cleanup test classes [httpcomponents-core]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
strangelookingnerd opened a new pull request, #470: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/470 This PR cleans up the test classes. The proposed changes include: **Remove superfluous exceptions in throws clauses** Superfluous exceptions within throws clauses have neg

Re: [PR] Cleanup test classes [httpcomponents-core]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
garydgregory commented on PR #470: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/470#issuecomment-2191613075 I would not change public vs package visibility, but that's just me, and the convention we've been using. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Cleanup test classes [httpcomponents-core]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
ok2c commented on PR #470: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/470#issuecomment-2191594071 Oh, that is a big one. > Make sure tests have at least one assertion I am aware of this recommendation but I always felt it was not justified / too extreme. Is

Re: [PR] Cleanup test classes [httpcomponents-core]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
strangelookingnerd commented on PR #470: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/470#issuecomment-2191634860 > > Make sure tests have at least one assertion > > I am aware of this recommendation but I always felt it was not justified / too extreme. I myself am

Re: [PR] Cleanup test classes [httpcomponents-core]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
strangelookingnerd commented on PR #470: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/470#issuecomment-2191642879 > I would not change public vs package visibility, but that's just me, and the convention we've been using. The thing is that right now there is a mixture (at