Congratulations Leonard.
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 17:23, Samrat Deb wrote:
> congratulations
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 9:44 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Leonard, well deserved!
> >
> > Best,
> > D.
> >
> > On Fri 21. 4. 2023 at 16:40, Feng Jin wrote:
> >
>
Congratulations Qingsheng.
Best regards
Ahmed
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 17:22, Samrat Deb wrote:
> congratulations !
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 9:45 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Qingsheng, well deserved!
> >
> > Best,
> > D.
> >
> > On Fri 21. 4. 2023 at 16:41, Feng Jin wrote:
would love to reiterate on Danny's point regarding credentials providers
and authentication, and on Jing's question regarding source if we have it
in plan.
I would also assume we will be adding support to Table API connector, can
we clarify that in the FLIP.
Best Regards,
Ahmed Hamdy
On F
nted on
Flink or external systems like Flink Kubernetes Operator?
Wdyt? I think the REST API proposal here sounds more and more interesting.
Best Regards,
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 07:59, Dong Lin wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Please see my comments inline.
>
Hi Martijn,
+1 (non-binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures match yours
- verified hashsums
- checked release notes
- reviewed the web PR
Best regards,
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 09:33, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - built from source code
posal for starting with DataStreamSink and
TableSink, It would be great to have some milestones delivered as soon as
ready.
best regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 11:15, Samrat Deb wrote:
> Hi Liu Ron,
>
> > 1. Regarding the `read.mode` and `write.mode`, you say here pro
Hi Dong,
Thanks for the quick reply and for clarification, yeah that makes sense!
Best Regards,
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 02:59, Dong Lin wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> I agree with you and Piotr that it would be useful to provide a more
> g
Thanks Martijn
Great improvements for the connector repo stability.
Best regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 12:21 Martijn Visser, wrote:
> Big thanks to Sergey Nuyanzin for his suggestion on the JVM thread dumps :)
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Martijn Visser
> wrote:
+1 the design looks great.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 07:08, Mohan, Deepthi
wrote:
> Thank you all for the feedback so far.
>
> @Xintong, as you may know, AWS provides a managed Apache Flink service
> called Kinesis Data Analytics. We regularly speak to o
Thanks Danny
+ 1 (non-binding)
* Signature and checksums are matching.
* Source Code builds locally.
* Web PR looks good.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 17:44, Jiabao Sun
wrote:
> Thanks Danny,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Build and compile the source code
Hello Karthi
Is this FLIP still in progress? I see the FLIP not updated & couldn't find
open JIRAs.
I am happy to take over if you are no longer working on this.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 14:49, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > For example, a us
Hi Martijn,
+1 (non-binding)
- verified Checksums and signatures
- no binaries in source
- Checked NOTICE files contains migrated artifacts
- tag is correct
- Approved Web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 15:35, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please r
Hi Allison
Thanks for the proposal.
+ (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 03:48, Weihua Hu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Weihua
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:16 AM Jing Ge
> wrote:
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best R
Hi Rui,
I have gone through the thread.
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 03:53, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-334:
> Decoupling autoscaler and kubernetes and
> support the St
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 14:22, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Rui
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Gyula Fóra wrote:
>
> > Hi All!
> >
> > Thanks for all the f
Thanks Gyula,
+1 for the proposal in general.
May I ask why are we interested in supporting more than the ones supported
by the community?
for example I understand all versions prior to 1.16 are now out of support,
why should we tie our compatibility 4 versions behind?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
Makes sense,
Thanks for the clarification.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 14:07, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi Ahmed!
>
> As I mentioned in the first email, the Flink Operator explicitly aims to
> make running Flink and Flink Platforms on Kubernetes easy. As most
Thanks Lorenzo,
Looking forward to the PRs.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 06:27, Lorenzo Nicora
wrote:
> Hello
>
> (apologies if this is a duplicate reply)
>
> I was working with Karthi on this connector, and I have taken over the
> development.
> We h
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 16:52, Jing Ge wrote:
> +1(binding). Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 5:26 PM Danny Cranmer
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for driving this Samrat!
> >
> > +1 (bin
Thanks for the proposal
+1(non-binding)
Best regards
Ahmed
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, 13:35 Yangze Guo, wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:39 PM xiangyu feng wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-362: Support minimum resource
>
+1(non binding)
Best regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, 19:57 Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan,
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023, 6:49 PM Xintong Song wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Xintong
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 09:38, xiangyu feng wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Feng Jin 于2023年10月9日周一 16:00写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Feng
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:12 PM Yangze Guo
+1(non-binding)
Regards
Ahmed
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 10:49 Qingsheng Ren, wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the work, Joao!
>
> Best,
> Qingsheng
>
> > On Oct 12, 2023, at 19:32, Leonard Xu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Joao for driving this work.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Leonard
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Singatures
- Verified Checksum
- Build source successfully
- Checked release tag exists
- Reviewed the web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 08:02, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signatures
> - Verified hashsums
> -
Hi Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Checked release notes
- Verified Checksums and Signature
- Checked no binaries in release.
- Reviewed web PR
- Build Connector from source.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 13:05, Andriy Redko wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), thanks a lot Danny!
>
+1(non-binding)
-Checked release notes
- Verified checksums and signatures
- Verified no binaries in release
- Build connector from source
- Reviewed web PR.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 11:23, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on th
Hi Danny
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures and checksums
- verified no binaries exists in archive
- built source
- reviewed web PR
- Ran E2E example with Kinesis, Firehose & DynamoDB datastream connectors.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 08:38, Martijn Visser
w
Hi Danny
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 11:59, Xingbo Huang wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> +1
>
> Thanks a lot for investigating this. Let me share the current code
> management and release situation of pyflink here. I hope it will be helpful
> to
Thank you Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
* Hashes and Signatures look good
* Tag is present in Github
* Verified source archive does not contain any binary files
* Source archive builds using maven
* Verified Notice and Licence files
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 12:41, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
Hello,
Thank you
+1 (non-binding)
Verified signatures and checksums
Verified source artifact does not contain binaries
Verified tag
Verified NOTICE file
Built from source
Best regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 18:48, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
Hi Hong
+1 for the proposal. Additionally I believe it serves the same value for
the schema classes as it does for connectors.
Best Regards,
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:51, Teoh, Hong
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the effort to externalize connectors, I would like to propo
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Ahmed
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 17:24, Jing Ge wrote:
> +1 Thanks for driving it!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:36 PM Danny Cranmer
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Hong, thanks for driving this.
> >
> > +1 on the proposal and the voting schema looks good.
> >
Thanks Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified hashes and signatures
- Built Source archive using maven
- Web PR looks good.
- Started WordCount Example
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 16:37, Jing Ge wrote:
> Thanks Danny,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - GPG signatures looks good
> - checked dist and maven rep
Dear Flink developers,
I want to move discussion on this FLIP[1] to voting. Discussion thread[2]
has been inactive for more than 2 months. Please feel free to add your
feedback below.
The vote will be open for at least 72
hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.
+1 (non-bindnig)
- Checked JIRA release notes
- verified hashes
- verified signatures
- built from source code succeeded
- checked Github release tag
- verified pom files point to version
- reviewed and Approved web PR
Best
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 02:43, Leonard Xu wrote:
>
+1 (non-binding)
- Release notes look good.
- verified signatures and checksums are correct.
- Verified no binaries in source archive.
- Built from source
- Approved Web PR (no comments if we are supporting 1.17+)
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 17:08, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> +1 (bindi
+ (non-binding)
- Verified signature and hashes are correct.
- Verified there are no binaries in the source archive
- Verified tag in github
- reviewed and approved web PR
- build source successfully
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 16:50, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Rele
Hi Lincoln
+1 (non-binding) from me
- Verified Checksums & Signatures
- Verified Source dists don't contain binaries
- Built source successfully
- reviewed web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 15:18, Lincoln Lee wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> Thanks for hel
Hello,
Thanks for the proposal, +1 for the FLIP.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 15:12, wudi <676366...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi, Leonard
> Thank you for your suggestion.
> I referred to other Connectors[1], modified the naming and types of
> relevant param
Hi Jinzhong,
Thanks for driving this,
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 01:33, Jing Ge wrote:
> +1 (binding) Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:32 PM Jing Ge wrote:
>
> > Hi Jinzhong,
> >
> >
Congratulations!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 12:30, Xintong Song wrote:
> Congratulations~!
>
> Best,
>
> Xintong
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM Feng Jin wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Best,
> > Fe
Congratulations, great work and great news.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 11:41, Benchao Li wrote:
> Congratulations, and thanks for the great work!
>
> Yuan Mei 于2024年3月21日周四 18:31写道：
> >
> > Thanks for driving these efforts!
> >
> > Cong
de in the
FLIP an example where the table is further used in subsequent queries
(specially in batch mode).
- I really like the standard of keeping the unified batch and streaming
approach
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 12:07, Lincoln Lee wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Thanks f
Hi everyone,
+1 for this proposal, I believe it is very useful to the minimum, It would
be great even having "ML_PREDICT" and "ML_EVALUATE" as built-in PTFs in
this FLIP as discussed.
IIUC this will be included in the 1.20 roadmap?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 22 Mar 2
+1 for the proposed timeline and release managers.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 07:41, Xintong Song wrote:
> +1 for the proposed timeline and Weijie & Rui as the release managers.
>
> I think it would be welcomed if another 1-2 volunteers join as the release
&g
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 10:45, Jinzhong Li wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Jinzhong
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:15 PM Zakelly Lan wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Zakelly
ed. Once all other features are implemented
we migrate the factory as well.
Proposal 2: We do nothing and wait for all features to be implemented.
Let me know your thoughts.
1- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31813
2- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31987
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
Hi Aleks,
Thanks for the valuable feedback, yeah I agree it might be confusing for
some users.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 18:40, Aleksandr Pilipenko wrote:
> Hi Ahmed, thank you for starting this discussion.
>
> In general, I am more inclined toward proposal 2
Congratulations!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 08:16, Paul Lam wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> Best,
> Paul Lam
>
> > 2024年3月28日 16:03，Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Congratulations~
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui
> >
would love to assist with the implementation and reviews if this FLIP was
accepted.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 19:19, Dhingra, Priya
wrote:
> Hi Dev,
>
> I would like to start a discussion about FLIP-438: Amazon SQS Sink
> Connector<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
Hi Rui,
Thanks for the proposal.
Is the deprecation Jira mentioned (FLINK-32258) correct?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 03:37, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there are no extra comments, I will start voting in three days, thank
> you~
>
> Best,
>
Hi Martijn,
Sorry for joining late,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Checksums and Signatures
- Verified no binaries in archive
- Built source successfully
- Checked tag correctly in github
- reviewed web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 13:54, Danny Cranmer wrote:
>
Acknowledged, +1 to start a vote.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 12:04, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, it's a typo. It should be FLINK-32558[1].
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32558
>
> Best,
> Rui
>
> O
Hi Claire,
I am in favor of Martijn and Leonard's points, it is better to follow aws
connectors and keep it under ASF.
Do you have other suggestions for connectors than pub/sub at the moment?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 08:38, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
Hi Wudi,
+1 (non-binding).
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 09:21, Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> Hi, Di.
>
> Thank you for driving it !
>
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Best,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
> On 2024/04/09 02:47:55 wudi wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
>
Thanks Peter for forwarding this.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:51, Péter Váry wrote:
> Forwarding the invite for the discussion we plan to do with the Iceberg
> folks, as some of you might be interested in this.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
&
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 06:39, Zhu Zhu wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月10日周三 13:11写道：
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> >
> > Bests,
> >
> > Zhongqiang Gong
> >
> &g
t;
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/connectors/datastream/guarantees/>
> <
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/connectors/datastream/guarantees/>
> ;>
> [2]
>
> https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSSimpleQueueService/l
Congratulations, Jing!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 10:46, weijie guo wrote:
> Congratulations, Jing!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Weijie
>
>
> Feng Jin 于2024年4月12日周五 17:24写道：
>
> > Congratulations, Jing
> >
> > Best,
> > Feng Jin
Congratulations Lincoln!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 11:09, yuxia wrote:
> Congratulations, Lincoln!
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人: "Feng Jin"
> 收件人: "dev"
> 发送时间: 星期五, 2024年 4 月 12日 下午 5:23:40
&
Hi Priya
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 22:56, Dhingra, Priya
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
>
>
> Thank you to everyone for the feedback on FLIP-438: Amazon SQS Sink
> Connector<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-438%3A+A
Congratulations, Zakelly
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 07:56, Hangxiang Yu wrote:
> Congratulations, Zakelly!
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 1:58 PM Yun Tang wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Zakelly!
> >
> > Best
> > Yun Tang
> >
+ 1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 08:28, Yuepeng Pan wrote:
> +1(non-binding).
>
>
>
>
> Best,
> Yuepeng Pan
>
> At 2024-04-17 14:27:27, "Ron liu" wrote:
> >Hi Dev,
> >
> >Thank you to everyone for th
Hi Danny,
Thanks for driving this.
+1 (non-binding)
- Checksum verified
- Signature and Keys match
- Licenses checked
- Build from source
- Run Kinesis example
- Reviewed web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 13:01, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -
Hi Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- verified hashes and checksums
- verified signature
- verified source contains no binaries
- tag exists in github
- reviewed web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote o
Hi Xia,
I have read through the FLIP and discussion and the new version of the FLIP
looks better.
+1 for the proposal.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 12:21, Ron Liu wrote:
> Hi, Xia
>
> Thanks for updating, looks good to me.
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
> Xia Su
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Checksums and hashes
- Verified Signatures
- No binaries in source
- Build source
- Github tag exists
- Reviewed Web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 11:22, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Sorry for typos:
>
> > Please review and vote on
+1 (non-binding)
- verified hashes and checksums
- verified signature
- verified source contains no binaries
- tag exists in github
- reviewed web PR
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 11:21, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on th
-304%3A+Pluggable+Failure+Enrichers
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 08:23, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi Swathi!
>
> Thank you for creating this proposal. I really like the general idea of
> increasing the K8s native observability of Flink job errors.
>
> I took a
+1 (non-binding)
Great work!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 14:36, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards,
> Jeyhun
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:22 PM Zhu Zhu wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
Thanks Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Checksums
- Verified Signatures
- No binaries exists in source archive
- Built source
- Reviewed Web PR
- Run basic Kinesis example
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 at 14:25, Hang Ruan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Validated
Hi, +1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 09:58, Yubin Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> During the implementation of the "describe catalog" syntax, it was
> found that the original output style needed to be improved.
> ```
>
Thanks Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Checksums and hashes
- Verified Signatures
- Reviewed web PR
- github tag exists
- Build source
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 03:47, Muhammet Orazov
wrote:
> Thanks Danny, +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Checked 512 hash
> -
Thanks Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Checksums and hashes
- Verified Signatures
- Reviewed web PR
- github tag exists
- Build source
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 03:57, Muhammet Orazov
wrote:
> Thanks! +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Checked 512 hash
> - Checked g
enrichers into reference.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 15:23, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> From a procedural point of view, we shouldn't make FLIPs sub-tasks for
> existing FLIPs that have been voted/are released. That will only cause
> confusion down the line. A new FL
requests.
The FLIP targets 1.20 with backward compatible changes and we should
proceed by adding support in all supporting connector repos.
1-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-451%3A+Refactor+Async+Sink+API
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
Hi Jeyhun,
Thanks for your feedback. I agree the phrasing is a bit confusing, the main
scope for FLIP-451 is limited to introducing timeout configuration and the
new "ResultHandler" to Async Sink API.
I will remove reference to FLIP-284 from the FLIP to disambiguate.
Best Regards
Ahmed
blockers are implemented?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 14:32, Péter Váry wrote:
> > With regards to FLINK-35149, the fix version indicates a change at Flink
> CDC; is that indeed correct, or does it require a change in the SinkV2
> interface?
>
> The fix does
Hi Qisheng,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and hashes
- Verified signatures
- Verified github tag exists
- Verified no binaries in source
- build source
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 23:03, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> Hi Qinsheng,
>
> Thanks for driving th
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 15:16, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this FLIP David.
>
> Regards,
> Jeyhun
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:21 PM Mark Nuttall wrote:
>
> > +1, I would also like to
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 05:33, ConradJam wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Biao Geng
> >
> >
> > gongzhongqi
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 02:46, Muhammet Orazov
wrote:
>
> Hey Yubin, +1 (non-binding)
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
> Best,
> Muhammet
>
> On 2024-04-24 08:56, Yubin Li wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Durin
Hi Priya,
It seems that we have acquired the threshold of binding votes, Should we
close the vote, announce the result and create Jiras?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 03:24, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 2024年4月17日 上午2:
Hi Jeyhun,
I have changed the scope of FLIP to exclude problems addressed by FLIP-284
and redefined scope to introduce timeout configuration.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 20:57, Ahmed Hamdy wrote:
> Hi Jeyhun,
> Thanks for your feedback. I agree the phrasing is
d we add a list of possible connectors that this FLIP would improve?
Good call, I have added under migration plan.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 08:49, Muhammet Orazov wrote:
> Hey Ahmed,
>
> Thanks for the FLIP! +1 (non-binding)
>
> > Additionally the cu
Thanks Qinsheng for driving,
+1 for the feature freeze date.
I am happy to assist with any release duties.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 10:50, Jiabao Sun wrote:
> Thanks Qingsheng,
>
> Improving stability is crucial for Flink CDC, looking forward to this
> r
Hi Piotr
+1 for the proposal, it seems to have a lot of gains.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 12:06, Zakelly Lan wrote:
> Hi Piotrek,
>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
> Good question. The intention and use case behind `DuplicatingFileSystem` is
> > d
Hi David, thanks for the update
We should wait to reach threshold of "binding" votes as per the process[1]
1-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws#FlinkBylaws-Approvals
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 16:06, David Radley wrote:
> Hi eve
Thanks for the effort and the data provided.
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:20, Keith Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Great work on the benchmark data.
>
> Keith
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 4:53 AM 周仁祥 wrote:
>
> > +1 (non
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 16:26, Keith Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best regards
> Keith Lee
>
>
> On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 04:58, Shengkai Fang wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Shengkai
>
blockers are implemented?
>
Could you please clarify?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sun, 12 May 2024 at 14:07, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If there are no more considerations, I'll open up a vote in the next couple
> of days.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn
&g
/ft7wcw7kyftvww25n5fm4l925tlgdfg0
2-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-451%3A+Introduce+timeout+configuration+to+AsyncSink+API
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
Thanks for the clarification.
+1 to starting the vote.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 09:10, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> There's no reason to refrain from releases for Flink 1.* versions: these
> connector implementations are still supported in the
/blob/c6e0abb65a0e51b40dd218b890a111886fbf797f/flink-connector-aws/flink-connector-aws-kinesis-streams/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/kinesis/sink/KinesisStreamsSinkWriter.java#L106
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:20, David Radley wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder if the way tha
Thanks David,
I have replied to your question in the discussion thread.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:21, David Radley wrote:
> Hi,
> I raised a question on the discussion thread, around retriable errors, as
> a possible alternative,
> Kind regards, David
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks Martijn!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 14:11, Jing Ge wrote:
> +1(binding) Thanks Martijn!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:00 PM Muhammet Orazov
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Martijn driving this!
Hi Lorenzo,
This seems like a very useful addition.
+1 (non-binding) from my side. I echo Jeyhun's question about backward
compatibility as it is not mentioned in the FLIP.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 08:12, wrote:
> Hello Muhammet and Jeyhun!
> Thanks for yo
Hi Lorenzo,
yes it is pretty useful to start tackling the ones that still don't
implement the new interface, happy so sync offline to close this task,
additionally a volunteer to review the migrations would be
highly appreciated.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 10:01,
Hi all,
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 02:13, Jiabao Sun wrote:
> Thanks for driving this proposal!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Jiabao
>
>
> On 2024/05/10 22:18:04 Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> > Thanks for driving this!
> &g
Congratulations,
Great Work!
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 10:56, ConradJam wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> Thanks for the great work.
>
> Hang Ruan 于2024年5月17日周五 17:48写道：
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Thanks for the great work.
> >
&
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
