Thanks Martijn
I believe you missed my question,

Should this change take place in 1.20, what are the planned release steps
> for connectors that only offer a deprecated interface in this case (i.e.
> RabbitMQ, Cassandra, pusbub, Hbase)? Are we going to refrain from releases
> till the blockers are implemented?
>

Could you please clarify?

Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy


On Sun, 12 May 2024 at 14:07, Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> If there are no more considerations, I'll open up a vote in the next couple
> of days.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:08 AM Hongshun Wang <loserwang1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martijn, Thanks for the proposal +1 from me.Some sinks still use
> > sinkfunction; it's time to take a step forward.
> >
> > Best,
> > Hongshun
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:44 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 from my side, thanks Martijn for the effort.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Leonard
> > >
> > > > 2024年5月4日 下午7:41,Ahmed Hamdy <hamdy10...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Martijn
> > > > Thanks for the proposal +1 from me.
> > > > Should this change take place in 1.20, what are the planned release
> > steps
> > > > for connectors that only offer a deprecated interface in this case
> > (i.e.
> > > > RabbitMQ, Cassandra, pusbub, Hbase)? Are we going to refrain from
> > > releases
> > > > that support 1.20+ till the blockers are implemented?
> > > > Best Regards
> > > > Ahmed Hamdy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 14:32, Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>> With regards to FLINK-35149, the fix version indicates a change at
> > > Flink
> > > >> CDC; is that indeed correct, or does it require a change in the
> SinkV2
> > > >> interface?
> > > >>
> > > >> The fix doesn't need change in SinkV2, so we are good there.
> > > >> The issue is that the new SinkV2
> > > SupportsCommitter/SupportsPreWriteTopology
> > > >> doesn't work with the CDC yet.
> > > >>
> > > >> Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2024.
> > máj.
> > > >> 3.,
> > > >> P, 14:06):
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Ferenc,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You're right, 1.20 it is :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've assigned the HBase one to you!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Martijn
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:55 PM Ferenc Csaky
> > <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid
> > > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Martijn,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 for the proposal.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> targeted for Flink 1.19
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I guess you meant Flink 1.20 here.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Also, I volunteer to take updating the HBase sink, feel free to
> > assign
> > > >>>> that task to me.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Ferenc
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Friday, May 3rd, 2024 at 10:20, Martijn Visser <
> > > >>>> martijnvis...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi Peter,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I'll add it for completeness, thanks!
> > > >>>>> With regards to FLINK-35149, the fix version indicates a change
> at
> > > >>> Flink
> > > >>>>> CDC; is that indeed correct, or does it require a change in the
> > > >> SinkV2
> > > >>>>> interface?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Martijn
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:47 AM Péter Váry
> > > >> peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi Martijn,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We might want to add FLIP-371 [1] to the list. (Or we aim only
> for
> > > >>>> higher
> > > >>>>>> level FLIPs?)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We are in the process of using the new API in Iceberg connector
> > > >> [2] -
> > > >>>> so
> > > >>>>>> far, so good.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I know of one minor known issue about the sink [3], which should
> > be
> > > >>>> ready
> > > >>>>>> for the release.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> All-in-all, I think we are in good shape, and we could move
> > forward
> > > >>>> with
> > > >>>>>> the promotion.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Peter
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [1] -
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=263430387
> > > >>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10179
> > > >>>>>> [3] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35149
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Thu, May 2, 2024, 09:47 Muhammet Orazov
> > > >>>> mor+fl...@morazow.com.invalid
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Got it, thanks!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 2024-05-02 06:53, Martijn Visser wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Muhammet,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for joining the discussion! The changes in this FLIP
> > > >> would
> > > >>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>> targeted for Flink 1.19, since it's only a matter of changing
> > > >> the
> > > >>>>>>>> annotation.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Martijn
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 7:26 AM Muhammet Orazov
> > > >>>> mor+fl...@morazow.com
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Martijn,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the FLIP and detailed history of changes, +1.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Would FLIP changes target for 2.0? I think it would be good
> > > >>>>>>>>> to have clear APIs on 2.0 release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Muhammet
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-01 15:30, Martijn Visser wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-453: Promote
> > > >>>> Unified Sink
> > > >>>>>>>>>> API V2
> > > >>>>>>>>>> to Public and Deprecate SinkFunction
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/rIobEg
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> This FLIP proposes to promote the Unified Sink API V2 from
> > > >>>>>>>>>> PublicEvolving
> > > >>>>>>>>>> to Public and to mark the SinkFunction as Deprecated.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your thoughts.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to