+1 for keeping the Quickstart on the main page but I'm against
removing it from the documentation because it is, essentially, a part
of the documentation.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Good point.
>
> How often does "Quickstart" change? Seems to be fairly stable. Maybe
Good point.
How often does "Quickstart" change? Seems to be fairly stable. Maybe we
could move it from doc page to main page?
Btw: The link "Flink on Windows" is broken in the Quickstart guide.
-Matthias
On 10/28/2015 02:09 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> I think the quickstarts should be very ea
I think the quickstarts should be very easy to discover, so we should keep them
on the main page. If you just browse to flink.apache.org you would not be aware
that they exist.
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 13:37, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> What about "Quickstart" menu point... I really would like to mo
What about "Quickstart" menu point... I really would like to move it
under "Documentation" (to get rid of linking to the doc page on two
places...)
Furthermore, I would suggest to rename "Overview" to "Home" on main page
and keep "Overview" on doc page.
Logo/Text: I am fine with a text-link (but
I agree with Max.
Renaming Overview in Documentation and adding a clear link back to the
project website are the most important issues, IMO.
2015-10-28 10:59 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels :
> We should be careful not to break links to the docs again. I'm in
> favor of making it more clear what is
We should be careful not to break links to the docs again. I'm in
favor of making it more clear what is the Flink web site and what its
documentation is. For me, it would be enough to change "Overview 1.0"
to "Documentation 1.0" and have a clear link which says "Back to Flink
website". That should
I agree, two Overview links pointing to different locations should be
changed.
I am not so sure about the Logo issue. IMO, there should be always a text
link. The logo link should only be an addition.
Maybe we should wait for more opinions, before we continue.
The website has been changed a couple
Yes, but I think that the "Overview" link to index.html is
confusing/wrong. The doc web page has "Overview" too, and it points to
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/index.html
There should be only one page with name "Overview" (either on the web
page or on the doc page). I actu
I agree that it is confusing that the documentation is linked more than
once from the project website menu. It is not clear when you enter the
documentation section and how to get back.
However, the "Overview" menu entry on the project website does not point to
the documentation but to http://flin
Thanks for the input Fabian!
I was actually referring to the main page regarding changes of the menu
structure.
Currently, the layout is:
>FlinkLogo| Overview | Quickstart | Features | Download |
> Documentation | FAQ || Blog | Community | Project
> (-> index.html) (-> doc page) (-
Hi Matthias,
thanks for taking care of this issue.
How about we change the menu completely, i.e., have menue entries for:
- Project Website
- Setup
- Local
- Cluster
- Yarn
- DataSet API
- Programming guide
- transformations
- DataStream API
- Programming Guide
- Internals
This is no
I started to work on this. Please see here:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink/tree/flink-2752-webpage
Basically, I just changed the color schema of the menu. I also remove
"How to Contribute" and "Coding Guidelines" from "Internals".
To get an even better separation, I would like to change the menu
Makes sense.
Besides the color scheme, we might also want to use different menu
structure and avoid to link "forth-and-back" to make the distinction
clearer.
On 10/26/2015 10:35 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:27, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>>
>> The website consists of two parts wh
Thanks Matthias for pointing this out. I opened an issue some time ago with
a similar description: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752
I agree with Fabian and Ufuk that it makes sense to separate the website
and the source repository. However, the distinction between the
documentation
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:27, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> The website consists of two parts which are maintained in two separate
> respositories:
>
> 1) The project website about features, community, etc.
> 2) The documentation of the project
>
> We have the separation because we want to be able to
The website consists of two parts which are maintained in two separate
respositories:
1) The project website about features, community, etc.
2) The documentation of the project
We have the separation because we want to be able to update source and
documentation in one repository to avoid that the
16 matches
Mail list logo
