Makes sense. Besides the color scheme, we might also want to use different menu structure and avoid to link "forth-and-back" to make the distinction clearer.
On 10/26/2015 10:35 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > >> On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:27, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The website consists of two parts which are maintained in two separate >> respositories: >> >> 1) The project website about features, community, etc. >> 2) The documentation of the project >> >> We have the separation because we want to be able to update source and >> documentation in one repository to avoid that the documentation gets out of >> sync. The documentation is built every night and hosted at ci.apache.org to >> achieve that. >> >> IMO, this separation makes sense, because the project website is not >> changed very often whereas the documentation should be touched whenever the >> API or behavior is changed. I think it is very important to have >> documentation in sync with the code. In fact, I believe both parts of the >> website should not be related to each other, so they shouldn't be a way to >> have both parts getting out-of-sync, except for layout / design which is >> nice to have but not crucial. We might even think about changing the >> color-scheme of the documentation to make the difference more clear. > > Yes, Max pointed this out in the beginning. Let’s change the colors/design to > make the distinction clear. The confusion comes from the fact that they look > similar. It only makes sense to assume that they are hosted on the same web > server etc. But as Fabian said, there are good reasons against it. > > – Ufuk >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
