The problem is still there. @Aljoscha: It would be great if you could take
it.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.
>
> On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi wrote:
>
> > FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persi
I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.
On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi wrote:
> FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
> solving it asap.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22,
FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
solving it asap.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > https://issues.apache.org/ji
On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger wrote:
> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as
> blockers.
FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy calls when
passing out
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as
blockers.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still nee
Hi everyone,
I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need to
be addressed. At least for me, those were
- fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
- removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
- Possibly fix an issue i
Okay, then I agree with you!
Thanks for clarifying that :-)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
wrote:
> If you want my personal opinion, I'd say yes.
>
> I am currently using Gelly for all my projects. For one of them, we have
> been running experiments over the last 4 months and
If you want my personal opinion, I'd say yes.
I am currently using Gelly for all my projects. For one of them, we have
been running experiments over the last 4 months and we'll be deploying it
in production very soon :)
Gelly did not change any internals or runtime features; it simply builds on
t
I would. Vasia already used it in production at Telefonica :)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Fair enough about including the issues into 0.9.1
>
> Concerning Gelly, would you recommend people to use that in production
> today? If not, it would be nice to have some non-depr
Fair enough about including the issues into 0.9.1
Concerning Gelly, would you recommend people to use that in production
today? If not, it would be nice to have some non-deprecated code where we
are confident about that.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> let me c
Hi,
let me clarify:
FLINK-1252 is missing a test for PageRank (which might not even be needed,
since the implementation is basically identical to the existing Spargel
one) and a test for MusicProfiles, which is basically using LabelProgation
(and we have a separate test for this).
FLINK-1943 is
The Pregel-like, vertex-cenric part of Gelly is as stable as it will ever
be.
I vote for deprecating Spargel in this release, but keep in mind that this
is just an opinion :)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Okay, I was not aware it is only two missing tests. That is not tha
Okay, I was not aware it is only two missing tests. That is not that big a
deal.
I am not very attached to the Spargel Stuff, I just want to make sure we do
not deprecate something that works well for something that is still work in
progress.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Andra Lungu wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I don't know if I have a saying in this, but I will give it a go :)
The two unsolved issues don't affect the functionality at all.
Gelly can, at the moment, support anything Spargel could. There is a guide
in the documentation explaining how to migrate Spargel code to Gelly. I
don't s
I will address the ExecutionGraphDeadlock today...
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Thanks Vasia!
>
> We should clearly label Gelly as Work in Progress and at Beta status, then
> it should be okay. This is very fair, it is the first version, people
> understand that.
>
> In
Thanks Vasia!
We should clearly label Gelly as Work in Progress and at Beta status, then
it should be okay. This is very fair, it is the first version, people
understand that.
In that sense, let us not call Spargel deprecated in favor of Gelly yet,
but do that for the next release when Gelly is r
On 05 Jun 2015, at 11:46, Robert Metzger wrote:
> I'll address the remaining documentation issues today.
Thank you so much for doing this.
> What about
> Sync Streaming Java/Scala API
> - Consolidate names across batch/streaming (discussion)
> - Merge static code analysis
>
> They seem
Hi all,
regarding the 2 gelly issues, I'm sorry but I haven't had time to work on
these.
And most certainly I won't be able to work on these today :S
In any case, I wouldn't consider them blocker issues, so if you agree,
please go ahead with the release candidate.
-Vasia.
On 5 June 2015 at 11:4
I'll address the remaining documentation issues today.
What about
-
Sync Streaming Java/Scala API
- Consolidate names across batch/streaming (discussion)
- Merge static code analysis
and the gelly TODOs
-
FLINK-1522 Add tests for the library methods and examples
- FLINK-1
Yes, Till, Max, Ufuk, and me have reached consensus that we will postpone
the batch scheduling to 0.10. It is a crucial feature, but we would not
like to have it in a highly pre-mature version in there.
What came up a lot is that there are a good set of additions that are close
to completion. We
Ping.
On 04 Jun 2015, at 14:11, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> Critical issues:
>
> - Skipped buffer
> (http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-ordering-problem-td6009.html)
> (I'm on it)
> - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133)
I'm investigating the skipped buffer. I
On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:00, Robert Metzger wrote:
> What is the status of the 0.9 release planning.
>
> It seems like many of the open issues from the document have been closed.
> When do you think are we able to fork off the "release-0.9" branch and
> create the first RC ?
It would be great to
What is the status of the 0.9 release planning.
It seems like many of the open issues from the document have been closed.
When do you think are we able to fork off the "release-0.9" branch and
create the first RC ?
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> +1 for cutting a releas
+1 for cutting a release soon.
The planning document looks reasonable ..
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Hi Squirrels!
>
> I think it is time we started finalizing the the 0.9 release. The latest
> milestone is a few weeks old and given the sheer amount of new features a
Hi Squirrels!
I think it is time we started finalizing the the 0.9 release. The latest
milestone is a few weeks old and given the sheer amount of new features and
the big interest in Flink these days, we should publish the next release
rather soon in my opinion.
There are a few issues that we nee
25 matches
Mail list logo
