Hi all, regarding the 2 gelly issues, I'm sorry but I haven't had time to work on these. And most certainly I won't be able to work on these today :S
In any case, I wouldn't consider them blocker issues, so if you agree, please go ahead with the release candidate. -Vasia. On 5 June 2015 at 11:46, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > I'll address the remaining documentation issues today. > > What about > > - > > Sync Streaming Java/Scala API > - Consolidate names across batch/streaming (discussion) > - Merge static code analysis > > and the gelly TODOs > > - > > FLINK-1522 Add tests for the library methods and examples > - FLINK-1943 Add Gelly-GSA compiler and translation tests > > > They seem both unresolved. > > Other than that it seems we are good to go. > Maybe we can manage to get the first release candidate out today? > > I'm uncertain whether we should fork off the "release-0.9" branch as part > of the RC creation or whether we should wait a bit with that. > > Forking it of would allow us to merge some of the pull requests (storm > compat), but we would need to apply many patches to two branches. > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Yes, Till, Max, Ufuk, and me have reached consensus that we will postpone > > the batch scheduling to 0.10. It is a crucial feature, but we would not > > like to have it in a highly pre-mature version in there. > > > > > > > > What came up a lot is that there are a good set of additions that are > close > > to completion. We will probably bring up the suggestion of a 0.10 release > > very soon after the 0.9 release. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > On 04 Jun 2015, at 14:11, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Critical issues: > > > > > > > > - Skipped buffer ( > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-ordering-problem-td6009.html > > ) > > > (I'm on it) > > > > - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133) > > > > > > I'm investigating the skipped buffer. I vote to not block the release > on > > > this though if I can't reproduce it in the next days. > > > > > > What about FLINK-2133? > > > > > > > Big open issue: > > > > - There has been consensus to merge the static code analysis PR for > > this > > > release, which needs some further testing (I'm on it) > > > > - Batch scheduling. I think Till and Stephan are working on this. Can > > > you guys give an estimate whether we will be able to have it in the > > release? > > > > > > @Till, Stephan: Will batch scheduling make it into the release? :) > > >
