What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as blockers.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need to > be addressed. At least for me, those were > > - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8 > - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635 > - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916 > > @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager. > > Cheers, > Max > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:00, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > What is the status of the 0.9 release planning. > > > > > > It seems like many of the open issues from the document have been > closed. > > > When do you think are we able to fork off the "release-0.9" branch and > > > create the first RC ? > > > > It would be great to do it in the next days. If there are no objections, > I > > would like to act as release manager. :-) > > > > Critical issues: > > > > - Skipped buffer ( > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-ordering-problem-td6009.html > ) > > (I'm on it) > > - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133) > > > > Big open issue: > > - There has been consensus to merge the static code analysis PR for this > > release, which needs some further testing (I'm on it) > > - Batch scheduling. I think Till and Stephan are working on this. Can you > > guys give an estimate whether we will be able to have it in the release? > > > > The other big issues have been postponed. > > > > – Ufuk >
