Yes, Till, Max, Ufuk, and me have reached consensus that we will postpone the batch scheduling to 0.10. It is a crucial feature, but we would not like to have it in a highly pre-mature version in there.
What came up a lot is that there are a good set of additions that are close to completion. We will probably bring up the suggestion of a 0.10 release very soon after the 0.9 release. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > Ping. > > On 04 Jun 2015, at 14:11, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Critical issues: > > > > - Skipped buffer ( > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-ordering-problem-td6009.html) > (I'm on it) > > - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133) > > I'm investigating the skipped buffer. I vote to not block the release on > this though if I can't reproduce it in the next days. > > What about FLINK-2133? > > > Big open issue: > > - There has been consensus to merge the static code analysis PR for this > release, which needs some further testing (I'm on it) > > - Batch scheduling. I think Till and Stephan are working on this. Can > you guys give an estimate whether we will be able to have it in the release? > > @Till, Stephan: Will batch scheduling make it into the release? :)
