Hi Max,
Is there a way that dev@ list gets email notification if the build fail for
the build bot?
- Henry
On Monday, October 26, 2015, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Thanks for reporting, Suneel. On my machine the Java docs build.
>
> Here's the build log:
>
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/flin
+1 for that one.
The good news is all Flink committers have been very discipline about
reviews :)
On Monday, October 26, 2015, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> those a good points. I did not really think about the different roles
> (technical, meta-role).
> My reasoning was that the shep
I started to work on this. Please see here:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink/tree/flink-2752-webpage
Basically, I just changed the color schema of the menu. I also remove
"How to Contribute" and "Coding Guidelines" from "Internals".
To get an even better separation, I would like to change the menu
Hi,
I updated the flink-external section on the Flink Web-Page:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page
The section is now located in "Contribute" page. The layout needs some
refinement though... Some Project are "previews", ie, Flink support was
announced but there is not inf
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
0.10.0:
The commit to be voted on:
d4479404a9a9245ed897189973d8f6dadb9c814b
Branch:
release-0.10.0-rc1 (see
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
The vote is cancelled in favor of a new release candidate.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce the problem of FLINK-2800 either. Still looking
> into it.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> > +1 for a new RC.
> >
> > I tr
Sound good to me.
And I agree; I cannot comment on my own work either ;)
On 10/26/2015 05:01 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> those a good points. I did not really think about the different roles
> (technical, meta-role).
> My reasoning was that the shepherd should be able to give fee
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-2925:
--
Summary: Client does not show root cause of Exception
Key: FLINK-2925
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2925
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvemen
Gyula Fora created FLINK-2924:
-
Summary: Create database state backend
Key: FLINK-2924
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2924
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Compo
Gyula Fora created FLINK-2923:
-
Summary: Make it possible to mix-and-match StateBackends with
KvState implementations
Key: FLINK-2923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2923
Project: Flink
2 spaces is the convention that's followed on Mahout and Oryx.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Concerning question 2 Tabs vs. Spaces, in case of spaces we would have to
> decide on the number of spaces, too. The Google Java style says to use a 2
> space indentation, which
Concerning question 2 Tabs vs. Spaces, in case of spaces we would have to
decide on the number of spaces, too. The Google Java style says to use a 2
space indentation, which is in my opinion sufficient to distinguish
different indentations levels from each other. Furthermore, it would save
some spa
+1 :-)
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
> +1 ^^
>
> On 23 October 2015 at 13:14, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> > +1 for 1.0
> > it's time to "grow up" :)
> >
> > On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
> > > +1 for 1.0, it's the right time if not a bit overdue in my o
+1 for having binaries, I'm working on a Spark application currently with
Scala 2.11 and having to rebuild everything when deploying e.g. to EC2 is a
pain.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I agree with Till, but is this something you want to address in this
> release already
Hi Matthias,
those a good points. I did not really think about the different roles
(technical, meta-role).
My reasoning was that the shepherd should be able to give feedback on the
PR in order to move it forward. This does not work so well if the shepherd
is also the author of the PR (at least I a
I agree with Till, but is this something you want to address in this release
already?
I would postpone it to 1.0.0.
– Ufuk
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 16:17, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
> I would be in favor of deploying also Scala 2.11 artifacts to Maven since
> more and more people will try out Flink w
I would be in favor of deploying also Scala 2.11 artifacts to Maven since
more and more people will try out Flink with Scala 2.11. Having the
dependencies in the Maven repository makes it considerably easier for
people to get their Flink jobs running.
Furthermore, I observed that people are not aw
Hi Flinksters,
We have recently committed an easy way to change Flink's Scala version. The
question arises now whether we should ship Scala 2.11 as binaries and via
Maven. For the rc0, I created all binaries twice, for Scala 2.10 and 2.11.
However, I didn't create Maven artifacts. This follows our
Aljoscha Krettek created FLINK-2922:
---
Summary: Add Queryable Window Operator
Key: FLINK-2922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2922
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
I wasn't able to reproduce the problem of FLINK-2800 either. Still looking
into it.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 for a new RC.
>
> I tried to reproduce FLINK-2800 but did not succeed yet. I will spend a bit
> more time on it and if we have a fix within time (before
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-2921:
Summary: Add online documentation of sample methods
Key: FLINK-2921
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2921
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvem
Makes sense.
Besides the color scheme, we might also want to use different menu
structure and avoid to link "forth-and-back" to make the distinction
clearer.
On 10/26/2015 10:35 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:27, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>>
>> The website consists of two parts wh
Thanks Matthias for pointing this out. I opened an issue some time ago with
a similar description: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752
I agree with Fabian and Ufuk that it makes sense to separate the website
and the source repository. However, the distinction between the
documentation
+1 for a new RC.
I tried to reproduce FLINK-2800 but did not succeed yet. I will spend a bit
more time on it and if we have a fix within time (before a new RC) we can
include it.
2015-10-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels :
> Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed
Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to the
release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1.
There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to be
available.
Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate?
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:27, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> The website consists of two parts which are maintained in two separate
> respositories:
>
> 1) The project website about features, community, etc.
> 2) The documentation of the project
>
> We have the separation because we want to be able to
The website consists of two parts which are maintained in two separate
respositories:
1) The project website about features, community, etc.
2) The documentation of the project
We have the separation because we want to be able to update source and
documentation in one repository to avoid that the
Thanks for reporting, Suneel. On my machine the Java docs build.
Here's the build log:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/flink-docs-master/builds/122/steps/Java%20%26%20Scala%20docs/logs/stdio
[ERROR]
/home/buildslave2/slave2/flink-docs-master/build/flink-staging/flink-scala-shell/src/main/scala/o
Hi,
I am not sure, but I guess there is something wrong on the web page. If
you click on "Overview" in the menu bar at the start page
(https://flink.apache.org/), it links to https://flink.apache.org/index.html
This seems to be wrong to me. I guess it should link to
https://ci.apache.org/projects
GaoLun created FLINK-2920:
-
Summary: Apply JMH on KryoVersusAvroMinibenchmark class.
Key: FLINK-2920
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2920
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-task
30 matches
Mail list logo
