Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to the release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1.
There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to be available. Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate? On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for bringing up the projects and the record API: > > - Concerning the projects: Nice to have, but not critical, unless we want > to change the names of the Maven artifacts. I would rather not rush this > > - Removal of Record API. Good thing to have, but should not be a release > blocker. I would be fine with doing this for 1.0 > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences of > > removing the Record API. > > Seems to be more than I initially expected. > > > > @Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to my > > repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests. Just > > reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks. > > > > 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>: > > > > > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break. > > > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted. I'm > > > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon. > > > > > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>: > > > > > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the removal > of > > >> the Record API. > > >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things) I'd be > > >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands). > > >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in > figuring > > >> out what still needs to be done. > > >> > > >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now. > > >> > > >> > > >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > >> > > >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old > record > > >>> API ( > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think that > > Chesnay > > >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA. > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure. > > >>>> > > >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project structure > > >>>> about > > >>>> three weeks ago [1]. > > >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many +1s. > > >>>> > > >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it after > the > > >>>> release? > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Fabian > > >>>> > > >>>> [1][ > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>: > > >>>> > > >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out by the > > time > > >>>>> > > >>>> we > > >>>> > > >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann < > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys are still > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> running > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann < > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894 > > >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while > helping > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> the > > >>>> > > >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we don't > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> allow > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is not > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> possible > > >>>> > > >>>>> to > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its subclasses. In > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> order > > >>>> > > >>>>> to > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to include a > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> fix > > >>>> > > >>>>> for > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> it in 0.10. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel < > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com > > >>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <m...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> streaming > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to give > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> more > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not > > >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution mode. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it then. But > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> something > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :') > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of old > jobs > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>> > > >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5). > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri > > >>>>>>>>> <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows the > last > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 5 > > >>>> > > >>>>> finished > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5. > > >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for the > old > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> interface > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one? > > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there something I need to > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> configure > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>> -V. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a > bit > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> by > > >>>> > > >>>>> streaming > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> always > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> one-shot > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> currently. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels < > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> m...@apache.org > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to > start > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> testing the > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues on the way. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> In > > >>>> > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push those > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>> > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are not supported by the detached YARN > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> detached > > >>>> > > >>>>> mode. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> programs > > >>>> > > >>>>> that > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> try > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> course > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> of > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached execution > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> mode > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> support > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution > > >>>> > > >>>>> doesn't > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the client submits the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> first > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> job > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and > then > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> returns an > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> program > > >>>> > > >>>>> tries > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release. I > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>> > > >>>>> disable > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> include > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> proper > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> support for the next release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> basic > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> starting > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <> > > >>>> > > >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com> > > >>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need a few patches. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> be the > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> blocker. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, > > >>>> > > >>>>> but > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> block > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good > > >>>> > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> fix > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> them, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT > > >>>> > > >>>>> right > > >>>>>>>> now > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start testing anyways, because I would > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect > > >>>> > > >>>>> us > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> find > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save time if we do not create a new > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>> > > >>>>> candidate > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> worth > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations before this release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyf...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) > > >>>> > > >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>> > > >>>>> view. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> ezt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta > > >>>> > > >>>>> (időpont: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 2015. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze, 20:07): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks Max :)) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what about the blocker issue (according to the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki) > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> FLINK-2747? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to get rid of staging > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether? > > >>>> > > >>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also bump the master to the next > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>> > > >>>>> then, > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> separate > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into release fixes and what goes into the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next > > >>>> > > >>>>> version... > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> thread, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess... > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> m...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidates have to be tested > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly. > > >>>> > > >>>>> Therefore, I > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody to take a look at the release page in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> wiki: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release > > >>>> > > >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > >>>> > > >>>>> like > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> everyone > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks in the documents to test the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> candidate: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> m...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The past months we have been working very > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard > > >>>> > > >>>>> to > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> push > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> towards > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to propose the first release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> =================================== > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> as > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-rc0 (see > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> at: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/ > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>> > > >>>>> fingerprint > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>> > > >>>>> found > > >>>>>>>> at: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047 > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > > >>>> > > >>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> majority > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... > > >>>> > > >>>>> =================================== > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >
