The vote is cancelled in favor of a new release candidate. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce the problem of FLINK-2800 either. Still looking > into it. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for a new RC. > > > > I tried to reproduce FLINK-2800 but did not succeed yet. I will spend a > bit > > more time on it and if we have a fix within time (before a new RC) we can > > include it. > > > > 2015-10-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>: > > > > > Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to > the > > > release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1. > > > > > > There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to > > be > > > available. > > > > > > Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate? > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for bringing up the projects and the record API: > > > > > > > > - Concerning the projects: Nice to have, but not critical, unless we > > > want > > > > to change the names of the Maven artifacts. I would rather not rush > > this > > > > > > > > - Removal of Record API. Good thing to have, but should not be a > > release > > > > blocker. I would be fine with doing this for 1.0 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences > of > > > > > removing the Record API. > > > > > Seems to be more than I initially expected. > > > > > > > > > > @Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to > my > > > > > repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests. > > > Just > > > > > reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break. > > > > > > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted. > > I'm > > > > > > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org > >: > > > > > > > > > > > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the > > removal > > > > of > > > > > >> the Record API. > > > > > >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things) > > I'd > > > be > > > > > >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands). > > > > > >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in > > > > figuring > > > > > >> out what still needs to be done. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old > > > > record > > > > > >>> API ( > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think > that > > > > > Chesnay > > > > > >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske < > > fhue...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project > > > structure > > > > > >>>> about > > > > > >>>> three weeks ago [1]. > > > > > >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many > > +1s. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it > > after > > > > the > > > > > >>>> release? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>> Fabian > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> [1][ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org > >: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out by > > the > > > > > time > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> we > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann < > > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys are > > > still > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> running > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann < > > > > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894 > > > > > >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while > > > > helping > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we > > > don't > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> allow > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is > not > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> possible > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its > subclasses. > > In > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> order > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to > > > include a > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> fix > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> it in 0.10. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel < > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" < > > m...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> streaming > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to > > > give > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> more > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not > > > > > >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution mode. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it > then. > > > But > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> something > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :') > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of > old > > > > jobs > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5). > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri > > > > > >>>>>>>>> <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows > the > > > > last > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 5 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> finished > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for > > the > > > > old > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> interface > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there something I need > to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> configure > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -V. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen < > > se...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used > quite > > a > > > > bit > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> by > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> streaming > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which > are > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> always > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> one-shot > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> currently. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> m...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea > to > > > > start > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> testing the > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues on the > > way. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push > those > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are not supported by the > detached > > > YARN > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> detached > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> mode. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> programs > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> try > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In > > the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> course > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached > execution > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> mode > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> support > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> doesn't > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the client submits > the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> first > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> job > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster > and > > > > then > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> returns an > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> program > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> tries > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for > the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release. I > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution mode but I > suggest > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> disable > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> include > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> proper > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> support for the next release. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode > > is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> basic > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> starting > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster > -yd > > -n > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0) > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also > > > found > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> blocker > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need a few patches. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what > would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be the > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> blocker. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> but > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> not > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> block > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They seem to be very corner > case. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fix > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> them, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> right > > > > > >>>>>>>> now > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start testing anyways, because I would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> us > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>> find > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> more > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save time if we do not create a new > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> candidate > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio > Pompermaier < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point out that Flink-2763 and > Flink-2800 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> worth > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations before this release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" < > > gyf...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my > point > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> view. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> ezt > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> (időpont: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2015. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze, 20:07): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks Max :)) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what about the blocker issue (according to the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki) > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> FLINK-2747? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to get rid of staging > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also bump the master to the next > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> then, > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> separate > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into release fixes and what goes into the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> version... > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> thread, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess... > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> m...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidates have to be tested > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Therefore, I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody to take a look at the release page in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> wiki: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> like > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everyone > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks in the documents to test the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> candidate: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> m...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The past months we have been working very > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> push > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> towards > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to propose the first release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> =================================== > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> as > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Apache > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-rc0 (see > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> at: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/ > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> fingerprint > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> found > > > > > >>>>>>>> at: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047 > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> if > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> majority > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0 > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> =================================== > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
