Big problem:
I think I might have just discovered a problem with the latest Falcon. I’m not
getting any css files when I compile.
I tested using the refactor-sprite branch. I’ll test on the main branch, but
I’m pretty sure it’s a Falcon problem…
:-(
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Alex Harui wro
+1000
Documentation is the first thing people look for in a framework. This is
absolutely critical (more than functionality and production apps).
Unfortunately, I’m really bad at documentation, so I can’t help much with this.
AFA productions apps go, my conversion to FlexJS is moving along quit
Nope. It does not look like the CSS files are output correctly in the 0.7.0
release… :-(
I think this is bad enough to require an RC2 or a really quick hotfix release.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Big problem:
>
> I think I might have just discovered a problem with the latest F
Scratch that. I used the falcon develop branch for compiling. It looks like
Alex just changed something there related to CSS files. I’m trying to compile
using an older version of the code to see what happens.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Nope. It does not look like the CSS file
I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS Typedefs”
(typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I
>
Hi Harbs,
well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't remember
us actually agreeing on that ;-)
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming fo
Sorry for the disturbance. The problem was that the falcon version did not
match the asjs version and the new css interface was not being used…
I’m having another issue with the latest version of falcon, but that will be a
separate thread…
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Scratch t
I’m getting an error when compiling my app with the latest build of Falcon
which I’m not seeing in the 0.7.0 release:
Object.defineProperties(org.apache.flex.html.supportClasses.Viewport.prototype,
/** @lends {org.apache.flex.html.supportClasses.Viewport.prototype} */ {
/** @export */
contentVie
Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi Harbs,
>
>
> well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't remember
> us actually agreeing on that ;-)
>
>
> Chris
>
>
Hi guys,
I just finished my talk at solutions.hamburg conference. I was expecting the
worst as my talk was at lunchtime and I was expecting to be torn apart by
JavaScript/TypeScript wolves. None of this happened.
Ok the number was reduced, but compared to other sessions in parallel I am
quit
Hi Alex,
I have had this too several times. This usually is a timing problem of multiple
build jobs on a windows system. In this case usually two builds are running in
parallel. If the ASJS build uses a jar that is currently built by another Job
and that Job replaces the jar in the Maven local
Hi Chris,
sounds like it was a successful event!
Christofer Dutz wrote
> By the way, I have my slides on Github:
> https://github.com/chrisdutz/flexjs-introduction-de
What a great summary, thanks for sharing!
It's very nice to read stuff like this in my native language from time to
time ;-)
Btw
Hi Olaf,
The reason is that I am creating my presentations as git projects so I can
create versions, branches with customizations for different usecases and I can
"code my presentation in IntelliJ" ;-)
I am just hosting it at Github in order to save/backup/share the presentation,
not in orde
You have my agreement too!
- Josh
On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
> Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> >
> > well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I co
15 is good, especially if many were not already following Flex/FlexJS at
Apache.
Thanks for helping get the word out. It would be interesting to see if
there are other conferences we should be trying to go to.
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 4:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>
>I just finished m
Are you working on a branch in flex-asjs? Have you synched that branch
against flex-asjs develop branch?
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 2:42 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m getting an error when compiling my app with the latest build of
>Falcon which I’m not seeing in the 0.7.0 release:
>
>Object.defineProperties(o
+1 :-) from me :-)
Chris
Von: Josh Tynjala
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 16:40:39
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
You have my agreement too!
- Josh
On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" wr
What kind of documentation are you talking about? Just filling out ASDoc,
or pages of words?
There are so many things that need to be done that having folks who aren't
currently committing code to FlexJS help with filling out ASDoc and
recruiting people who are good at writing to write more verbo
I don't quite agree.
The problem with FlexJS is that you have to do things differently than with
Flex. For Flex the web is full of useful and less useful how-tos on the topic,
but for FlexJS there is next to nothing to be found.
It would be great to have some Documentation, walking an interes
On 9/8/16, 8:31 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>I don't quite agree.
>
>
>The problem with FlexJS is that you have to do things differently than
>with Flex. For Flex the web is full of useful and less useful how-tos on
>the topic, but for FlexJS there is next to nothing to be found.
For sure, we
There really is a need for some better basic documentation. Not even
advanced level stuff. We already have some of that, actually. Most users
aren't going to start developing custom components and contributing right
away, though. They're going to want some more hand holding.
Let's say that I went
Thanks Josh, more specific information like this is helpful because it
narrows down what is missing. We should make the ASDoc more readily
available.
Adobe had a whole team dedicated to documentation. Apache Flex does not
have that, so we need to be smarter about how to make our doc better.
Just
Documentation is crucial if we want to get people embracing the technology.
Less info on what is inside FlexJS, the purpose and how to use means less
people talking about it. I think the most active people here producing
code, components, and other parts of the framework has the responsability
not
I think we are basically in agreement, but the priority and people
matters. For example, we are having a debate about whether the SWF-side
code should wrap DisplayObjects or not. That decision will affect
documentation and lots of other things. Once we decide that, and prove
that you can do usef
I really love this comment from Josh.
"I guarantee you, if the wiki lists all of the components with ridiculously
simple examples, and if we post some FlexJS asdocs under the documentation menu
on the main site, that's going to make a huge difference."
I have been following this mailing list fo
Hi all,
And we should keep in mind that there is always the threat of the full time
developers no longer being paid for their work on flex. The more undocumented
stuff we have, the more the project will suffer in that case.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Urspr
Hey Alex,
Should you also remove the rc="rc1" here? I just tried using the Installer
to download FlexJS 0.7.0, and it tried to load the FalconJX 0.7.0 from a
URL containing a directory named rc1, which failed because it did not exist.
- Josh
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:10 PM, wrote:
> Author: ah
Alex Harui wrote
> It would be interesting to see if there are other conferences we should be
> trying to go to.
In germany there are e.g.:
http://www.html5-days.de
https://webinale.de/
http://webtechcon.com
The webtechcon (parallel with the phpcon) is the biggest conference of these
(+90 talks a
There's a different problem that is currently messing up the installer.
I'm trying to find a workaround, but I'm not sure the mirrors are
propagating changes to files.
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 10:53 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Hey Alex,
>
>Should you also remove the rc="rc1" here? I just tried using th
Okay, thanks!
- Josh
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> There's a different problem that is currently messing up the installer.
>
> I'm trying to find a workaround, but I'm not sure the mirrors are
> propagating changes to files.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/8/16, 10:53 AM, "Josh Tynjal
>From talking to former flex users today, I guess a migration strategy document
>would probably be the most valuable document. Here companies can migrate their
>old flex code to flexjs.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Diab
I’m working off the refactor-sprite branch which has all the latest changes
from develop. (I merged it today.)
When I compile against the Falcon 0.7.0 release, I get no errors. If I compile
against the latest Falcon develop branch, I get this error. This is both using
the same asjs code (latest
The latest Falcon is expecting to find a new interface in the JS
dependencies and uses that to determine whether to output CSS information.
In the bin/js-debug, is there an ICSSImpl.js file?
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 12:00 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m working off the refactor-sprite branch which has all the
Yes.
My original problem was with ICSSImpl, but I resolved that. My problem is no
longer the CSS file (which I now have). It’s now that I cannot get the
iContentView because SimpleCSSValuesImpl does not find it.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The latest Falcon is expecting t
I hope to write a long blog post on my migration experiences when I have time.
(But time has been very hard to come by…)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 9:48 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> From talking to former flex users today, I guess a migration strategy
> document would probably be the most valuable doc
Can the latest falcon compile and run DataBindingExample in the develop
branch and/or the refactor-sprite branch or is DataBindingExample having
the same problem?
On 9/8/16, 12:13 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Yes.
>
>My original problem was with ICSSImpl, but I resolved that. My problem is
>no longer the
DataBindingExample works.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Can the latest falcon compile and run DataBindingExample in the develop
> branch and/or the refactor-sprite branch or is DataBindingExample having
> the same problem?
>
> On 9/8/16, 12:13 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>
OK, then there is some issue I haven't seen before.
What example is having this problem, and is it only the version in
sprite-refactor?
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 12:32 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>DataBindingExample works.
>
>On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Can the latest falcon compile and
OK, I saw it install successfully for me. If you get a failure, wait a
bit and try again. The mirrors are still propagating out the workaround.
-Alex
On 9/8/16, 10:59 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Okay, thanks!
>
>- Josh
>
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> There's a diffe
It’s in my app.
I’ll see if I can distill the problem.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, then there is some issue I haven't seen before.
>
> What example is having this problem, and is it only the version in
> sprite-refactor?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/8/16, 12:32 PM, "Harbs" wr
Installation works for me now!
- Josh
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I saw it install successfully for me. If you get a failure, wait a
> bit and try again. The mirrors are still propagating out the workaround.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/8/16, 10:59 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote
The file js/lib/google/closure-library/closure/goog/bootstrap/nodejs.js is
missing from 0.7.0. This file is required to run debug builds produced by
asnodec with Node.js. Release builds aren't broken, but this still isn't
good.
At some point, flex-asjs started using a subset of GCL, and this file
Just to be sure, I cleaned the third-party downloads in my local repository
and ran ant all. The file ended up in the correct location, as it had when
I originally tested my change. This seems to confirm that the 0.7.0 binary
release was built using cached downloads, which were out of date.
To avo
Hi Alex,
You mentioned that Falcon is already set-up to be a code completion engine
for FlashBuilder. Ideally we would love to leverage it, using it for the
Moonshine IDE. Do you have any information about how Falcon can be
communicated with to extract that? Possibly an entry-point to the
code-co
Alex this might be a question more for you, unless others are familiar with
the topic.
I am currently doing a bit more on reflection. Instead of outputting the
fully resolved ancestral definition for each class, which would mean a lot
of duplicated output across the inheritance chain, I assumed it
Never mind, I think I don't need to do this output. It looks like I can
simply use constructor.superClass in js and go recursive. Please ignore.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Alex this might be a question more for you, unless others are familiar
> with the topic.
>
> I am
On 9/8/16, 4:12 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>To avoid this issue in the future, whichever ant target is used to create
>a
>binary release should probably clean everything first. Another potential
>issue is that someone might modify their downloaded files to test
>something
>locally and forget to
There is a separate thread on this on the dev@flex.apache.org mailing list.
Let's use that for this discussion. You may need to subscribe to the mailing
list if you haven't already.
Thanks,
-Alex
From: "Walker L. Dalton" mailto:wal...@prominic.net>>
Date: Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:18 P
Hi,
I changed the port on apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net from 8080 to the
regular 80 to try to fix an issue.
Thanks,
-Alex
Actually I think the safest thing to do here would be to output the
immediate base class, I *think* that should always work correctly. And that
is all I need to follow the inheritance chain and collect the inherited
members for the higher level TypeDefinition. Alex if you have a different
view of h
"Alex if you have a different view of how this should work, please let me
know."
Sorry I have been to long in the compiler. I see what is needed in the
framework code now. I will just use what is there. :)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Actually I think the safest thing
I can probably do that tomorrow. Can you point me to instructions? I don't
know where to upload the updated binaries or what the Apache process is to
do the signing. Is there an easy way to generate an md5 for a file on Mac?
- Josh
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/8/
You will need a PGP key, if you don't have one already:
https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
I would create an "out" folder in a flex-asjs working copy, and unzip the
binary package in there, then add the missing file.
Then I would run:
ant binary-package-tgz binary-package-zip
That should
On 9/8/16, 5:39 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>"Alex if you have a different view of how this should work, please let me
>know."
>
>Sorry I have been to long in the compiler. I see what is needed in the
>framework code now. I will just use what is there. :)
>
Sounds good. There is trade-off between
I've just followed your lead here, you had done a lot of the initial work
already, so I didn't have to figure out the 'how to do' part, just bits of
the 'what to do'.
So far I have added optional caching (TypeDefinition.useCache), but it is
currently not on by default (I haven't actually gotten to
Alex Harui wrote
> Moonshine is an AIR app, correct? Porting Falcon's AST code to
> ActionScript would be a serious project. I'm wondering if there is some
> way to leverage Falcon, possibly as an ANE, or via some other
> cross-process communication. Falcon is already set up to be a
> code-compl
On 9/8/16, 9:50 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>What is your preference for me getting this into the repo? If all current
>(updated) tests pass and nothing else seems broken is it ok if I push to
>develop for jx and asjs? Or do you prefer I go to branches on both until
>it
>can be checked by you or oth
Good to know. Pretty sure there is nothing outside of reflection here, so
that sounds great.- thanks
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/8/16, 9:50 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >What is your preference for me getting this into the repo? If all current
> >(updated) tests
Hi,
I notice everyone agrees that the docs are crucial, so why not just starting
with it instead of wasting time with discussion? ;-)
Some thoughts to the wiki:
It is also not my favorite candidate for the docs cause it feels a bit
old-fashioned and I'm always lost while searching for something.
B
Hi Santanu4ver,
you may not like this, but have you thought about using MS Visual Studio Code
as the base IDE instead of writing another one yourself? Just stumbled upon
this IDE today and it looks really good, it’s free, it's very fast, but only
has basic
ActionScript support (language modules c
>3) Are beads interchangeable through any strand?
I thought I should share my thoughts on this:
I wonder if we should separate strands and beads so that they exist side by
side iside the docs or if we should nest beads under the related strand?
If some beads would be interchangable and some not w
On 9/8/16, 9:56 PM, "santanu4ver" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I was looking into the Falcon description page here:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Falcon+Overview which
>confirms your opinion/suggestion on Falcon's code to use for
>code-completion
>to an IDE:
>
>
>cwiki.apache.org wro
On 9/8/16, 10:08 PM, "OK" wrote:
>Hi,
>I notice everyone agrees that the docs are crucial, so why not just
>starting
>with it instead of wasting time with discussion? ;-)
>
>Some thoughts to the wiki:
>It is also not my favorite candidate for the docs cause it feels a bit
>old-fashioned and I'm
I changed it back since it didn't help.
On 9/8/16, 5:32 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I changed the port on apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net from 8080 to the
>regular 80 to try to fix an issue.
>
>Thanks,
>-Alex
>
Dear Apache Flex / FlexJS community --
I am pleased to report we have finally reached a balance between Apple's
security requirements for the App Store and the needs of the Moonshine IDE
to install the necessary SDKs and command-line tools such as ANT for
automated project builds.
As of v1.2.0,
65 matches
Mail list logo
