I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred. I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I > was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of FlexJS: > falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of > consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS. > > > Chris > > ________________________________ > Von: OK <p...@olafkrueger.net> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK > > Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex. > >> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a differentiator. > FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously. > > Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is sufficient. > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
