Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6 to be
released.
*Issues addressed in this release*:
1. Ability to select Flex SDK version
2. Ability to select a combination of Flash Player and AIR versions
3. Support for installing Nightly builds of the Flex SDK
4. Support for in
Hi Om,
Is the SDK is on SVN? As here compressed and exe are not allowed. So maybe I
can get the SDK through SVN.
Please provide the link of the SVN.
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:54 P
Hi,
This is the Install Log:-
Version 2.6.0 (windows)
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 3.8
Flash Player version 11.8
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.10.0/rc3/b
It looks like the download of the AIR SDK failed or the uncompressing
of the .zip 'misfired'. Can you please empty the target directory or
create a new one and try again?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Manish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the Install Log:-
>
> Version 2.6.0 (windows)
Let's not discuss stuff in the VOTE thread, that makes it harder to
keep track of everyone's vote.
Thanks,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Again got an Installation abort after cleaning the %temp%.
Version 2.6.0 (windows)
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 3.8
Flash Player version 11.8
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Unable to create temporary directory
Unable to clean up temporary i
Hi,
Please put all discussion re the installer vote here.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Snap! Please ignore the the thread I just created and place all the discussion
here.
Justin
Hi,
And please ignore this thread as another have just been created.
Justin
Manish,
Can you manually create a directory in the location you are trying to
install the SDK to? It looks like the Installer aborts because it
doesn't have enough privileges to create the directory
programmatically.
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Manish Sharma wrote:
> Again got an In
I have created a new folder in the c: drive. Previously it was Aborted after
half of the installation but gaain when I tried It about at the very first
second.
I have created new folder each and every time for the installation. Is there
any other place where the Temporaries are created? Or it'
The temp folder is create inside the root folder for the install.
You said earlier that you weren't able to download compressed files
and executables... Is that a system wide restriction, or does it apply
only to emails? If you cannot download binaries yourself, then you
cannot expect a program to
Ok, this is what I tried:
I created a new project in FB. It uses the 4.10 SDK in the FB/sdks
folder. In "project properties/Flex Build Path" on the "Source path"
tab I added the folder
"/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/spark",
thinking this will allow me to work on
The Link is Blocked here.
Yes the System is in wide restriction.
But I am able to download the Installer through
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.6/rc2/binaries/
Should I go for
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.10.0/rc3/binaries/
For SDK, Is it the comp
Hi,
Looks like nightly option is downloading RC3 not the nightly release but not
100% sure - is this just a config issue?
Justin
Hi Erik,
Did you make sure you have the "merge in the code" option checked ?
-Message d'origine-
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:41 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REQUEST] A tutorial on how to fix bugs for the Flex SDK
Ok, this is what I tried:
I created
Done.
I don't know where the comments get emailed to -- I'm the one who posted
some of those entries and I never got a notice on them.
-Nick
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone with the right karma removed the spam (last comments) from:
> https://blogs.a
Scott,
I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Are we still going to wait for the
installer to be finished, or do you want me to post it right now?
-Nick
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Scott Guthmann wrote:
> > I have made all the edits I could find from this thread. The press
> release is r
There hasn't been a release yet, we just passed the VOTE on which
candidate will be released. We wait for the release manager to tell us
when it's OK to start the marketing.
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Ar
Hi,
I just posted FLEX-33636 [1]: I get the error "Initializer for
'layout': values of type spark.layouts.supportClasses.LayoutBase
cannot be represented in text." on a new project using 4.10.0
(11.8/3.8) in FB 4.7. The error is linked to the 'layout="absolute"'
attribute on the s:Application tag
That setting was on the default: "Use SDK default (merged into code)",
so I guess I did.
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Frédéric Thomas
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Did you make sure you have the "merge in the code" option checked ?
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Erik de Bruin
> Sent: F
Ok, when I tried
"/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/spark/src"
instead of what I had
"/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/spark"
I now get some of the errors Om was mentioning.
To be continued...
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:42
Ok, I'm stuck again.
I did New Project and added the spark/src folder as indicated above. I
added one Label to the app. Now when I try to run, I get the error
Error: Skin for Main cannot be found.
I tried adding some other source directories to the source path, to no avail.
I'm less and less su
Hi,
> I created a new project in FB. It uses the 4.10 SDK in the FB/sdks
> folder. In "project properties/Flex Build Path" on the "Source path"
> tab
Should be no need to do this it should pick up the source automatically.
For instance in the new SDK I just installed command clicking of a framew
Hi,
Can reproduce. Looks like a FB bug to me (sadly - means we can't fix it), I
think it thinks it's an old project (it's not passing the SDK version number
correctly) and stuffs up the application template.
Thanks,
Justin
On 26/07/2013 11:56, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I created a new project in FB. It uses the 4.10 SDK in the FB/sdks
folder. In "project properties/Flex Build Path" on the "Source path"
tab
Should be no need to do this it should pick up the source automatically.
Sounds like might have both the .sw
Hi,
A couple of very very minor issues:
- Nighty build defaults to AIR 3.7 not AIR 3.8 (if you're going cutting edge
you might as well go all the way!)
- Apache Flex 4.8 is not on the SDK List
- README needs minor edits to fix in 80 chars
- README doesn't mention sdk-installer-config-3.0.xml or n
Hi Erik
Yes I can also reproduce. When I choose Flex SDK 4.6 instead of an
Apache Flex SDK to create a project it uses a correct template. Is
there somwhere still a bug database for flash builder?
regards
Cyrill
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can reproduce. Loo
Justin,
I was trying out the method Om and Alex describe. I'm familiar with
the setup you use, as it is the one I use and have had no problems
with. I was interested in the 'direct' method because on paper (in
email) it sounds easier. But I was unable to get the setup to work. I
was hoping Om or A
I could go either way on this as well. There is one advantage I can think
of that addChromeElement et al has over the IChrome interface.
Suppose you want to put a non-standard chrome component into a Container's
chrome space? For example, you want a horizontal container of buttons.
Using IChrome,
We can't call this an FB bug, as 'New Project' works correctly with
SDK 4.9.1 and Flash Builder hasn't been updated between the 4.9
release and this one. It must be something we did for this release
that made 'New Project' - a rather essential feature, I'd say - fail.
So, with 2 people confirming
Hi,
> We can't call this an FB bug
Fairly certain it is a FB bug as we don't generate the application "template"
anywhere in the SDK that Im aware of, FB does that itself based on (I assume)
the SDK version number.
We might be able to trick it by selecting the right version number but that's
n
Hi,
> So, with 2 people confirming this is indeed an issue, I move to hold
> the release until this is fixed.
How do you suggest we fix it? As we can't exactly catch patch Flash Builder.
Justin
My computer is tied up for a couple more hours running tests on the
resource module fix. Does someone have the time to rebuild our current
code with the version 4.9.9 and see if makes FB happier?
I'll see if I can find the FB code for the template.
-Alex
On 7/26/13 6:35 AM, "Justin Mclean" wro
Hi,
And I really have to say this is not exactly a show stopper or critical issue.
This need to put into perspective as there a very simple work around eg just
fix/edit the code yourself. It's an inconvenience at most, nothing to do with
the SDK itself, and not everyone uses Flash Builder. I'm
On 7/26/13 2:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Ok, this is what I tried:
>
>I created a new project in FB. It uses the 4.10 SDK in the FB/sdks
>folder. In "project properties/Flex Build Path" on the "Source path"
>tab I added the folder
>"/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/pr
In one of the past releases, we messed up the core.swc build script and
didn't catch it until after release. It seems like we should make sure
this is in fact a bug in FB and not some other thing we messed up that is
under our control before releasing. So somebody should try a build with a
4.9.9
With following steps I could create new flash builder projects again
with no errors.
1) Changed element in flex-sdk-description.xml from 4.10.0 to 4.9.0
2) Configure SDK in Flash Builder
3) Create new Project with newly configured SDK
My sdk was installed with Apache Flex Installer. So I would s
> Scott,
> I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Are we still going to wait for the
> installer to be finished, or do you want me to post it right now?
> -Nick
First, here is the shared document. Please let me know if you are not able to
see it and edit it:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b
Ugh. Thanks for checking it out.
So the SDK name still showed up as 4.10? I suppose we could just leave
the version element at 4.9.9 with a comment saying we had to do that for
FB. But I wonder if the version element is used elsewhere?
-Alex
On 7/26/13 7:52 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>With f
But I wonder if the version element is used elsewhere?
Just for info, it is used by the mavenizer too but there is no issues,
tested it time ago with 4.10.x
One particularity is with x == 0, it generates 4.10.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
the classic 4.10.x which is useful when you want to mavenize th
Oups, I meant when the build number is 0
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 5:40 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Attention: another possible show stopper, please verify
But I wonder if the version element is used elsewhere?
Just for info, i
Hi Scott,
I finally got a look at the doc. Thanks for writing this up. Some
comments:
1) Instead of "Voting member & committer of the Apache Flex PMC", which
sounds like a title, that it say "committer and member of the Apache Flex
PMC".
2) I'm not sure I understand this paragraph:
The Pro
I'm able to get the merge to master down to 137 conflicts by running these
commands:
$ git checkout master
$ git reset --hard// to get a clean status due to duplicate file names in
the release branch
$ git config merge.renamelimit 3200 // without this a warning is giving that
the default
I think this is how you can resolve each of the 137 conflicts based on their
status.
"added by them"
$ git add
"both deleted" or "deleted by them"
$ git rm
"both added"
$ git checkout --theirs
$ git add
Hope this helps,
--Dasa
On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> I'm able
I found the offending code in an FB class. It is using a single \d for
the version parsing. I wonder what it would take to patch it?
-Alex
On 7/26/13 8:45 AM, "Frédéric Thomas" wrote:
>Oups, I meant when the build number is 0
>
>-Message d'origine-
>From: Frédéric Thomas
>Sent: Friday
It was :-(
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/26/13 2:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
>>Ok, this is what I tried:
>>
>>I created a new project in FB. It uses the 4.10 SDK in the FB/sdks
>>folder. In "project properties/Flex Build Path" on the "Source path"
>>tab
I must strongly disagree. If you can't even create a new project in FB
with the latest SDK release, we are going to have a lot of negative
karma send our way. Not to mention the consequences of having less
experienced and new users try to run an EMPTY application and fail -
and then have to debug i
Hmm. The source path is really
"/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/spark/sr
c" (with "/src")? And you aren't using RSLs?
What does a link report say for which Label.as it used?
On 7/26/13 11:57 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>It was :-(
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2
OK, I have a fix that passed all mustella tests. Now the question is
whether we cut another RC to take it. While we ponder that, I'm going to
double-check that Ilist change...
On 7/25/13 4:59 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 7/25/13 4:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> and two folks have
I have the same error as well, for a Flex 4.10 RC3 web project.
No issues at the moment for mobile or desk AIR
aYo
www.ayobinitie.com
mrbinitie.blogspot.com
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013 11:39
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Hi,
I just posted FLEX-33636 [1]: I get the e
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I found the offending code in an FB class. It is using a single \d for
> the version parsing.
Can you please elaborate about the version parsing bug in FB?
> I wonder what it would take to patch it?
>
>
Who is this question targeted towar
Hi,
At this point, I think we have three significant issues in the release.
1. Folks using ResourceModules via flashvars will get exceptions. The
population affected is small, but enough folks use them that already two
folks on our dev list have said they are affected.
2. The default template fo
On 7/26/13 2:49 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I found the offending code in an FB class. It is using a single \d for
>> the version parsing.
>
>
>Can you please elaborate about the version parsing bug in FB?
AFAICT, this snippet is
Are folks still seeing the german/english problem reported earlier? Or
has it gone away?
On 7/26/13 1:50 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Let's not discuss stuff in the VOTE thread, that makes it harder to
>keep track of everyone's vote.
>
>Thanks,
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luy
Hi All,
I had this [1] today on a new project also… I guess this is a bug too.. Or a fb
bug.. With 4.9.1 I haven't had this problem.
The same way i fixed this with a new project as I did with a old project.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33631
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstra
Hi, that issue is issue #3 in my list. Can you provide more information
about how you fixed it? I would think you would have to swap out 4.10.0
swcs for 4.9.x swcs.
On 7/26/13 3:19 PM, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I had this [1] today on a new project alsoŠ I guess this is a bug too..
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At this point, I think we have three significant issues in the release.
>
> 1. Folks using ResourceModules via flashvars will get exceptions. The
> population affected is small, but enough folks use them that already two
> folks on our
+1
Ran the installer from Air client 3.6. Installed fine. Ran and setup
everything it said it would.
OS: Win7
Language: English
-Mark
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6 to be
> released.
>
> *Issues addr
Ok here's the feedback on FDT5 Linux. I did not bother with 4.10.0 as that
is not released yet. I wanted to be certain that the layout attribute was
not causing problems as it is a released version
1. With SDK 4.9.0 I get a java null pointer error - I tried to work around
this error using the FDT
Tried it yesterday on Windows and I could chose between various SDKs. It
seemed to run sans problems
+1
~a~
www.ayobinitie.com
http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
On 27 July 2013 00:22, Mark Kessler wrote:
> +1
>
> Ran the installer from Air client 3.6. Installed fine. Ran and setup
> everything i
Om, in looking at the code, if StringTools does not return a locale that
matches one of the known ones, the langSelect dropdown will be set to
"Deutsch" but the locale chain will be just en_US. Maybe the dropdown
should default to English (US)?
IOW, in the applicationComplete handler, instead of
Hi,
> OK, I have a fix that passed all mustella tests.
Can we see the code please?
Justin
Hi,
Thanks for that. Any clue to why Git is having issues here? I would of expected
zero or a couple of conflicts as there have been no changes done to the trunk.
Justin
On 27/07/2013, at 4:03 AM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> I think this is how you can resolve each of the 137 conflicts based on thei
On 7/26/13 5:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> OK, I have a fix that passed all mustella tests.
>
>Can we see the code please?
The patch file is copied in below. Basically, the locale setting from
flashvars is moved from the ResourceManagerImpl's constructor to the part
of the Preloader
Hi,
> 1. Folks using ResourceModules via flashvars will get exceptions. The
> population affected is small, but enough folks use them that already two
> folks on our dev list have said they are affected.
But your fix fixes this right?
> 2. The default template for new projects in Flash Builder i
Hi,
> +1 to reverting the change. There could be thirdparty components for which
> the source code may not be readily accessible. This could be a big
> problem.
Not really there's is a work around ie revert the change in the SDK and
recompile. As everyone has access to the source code they pa
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for that. Any clue to why Git is having issues here? I would of
> expected zero or a couple of conflicts as there have been no changes done
> to the trunk.
>
> Justin
>
>
Just guessing - I would expect the .gitignores to be dif
Hi,
> +var localeChainList:String =
> +SystemManagerGlobals.parameters["localeChain"];
Possibly RTE here?
Justin
IntelliJ IDEA 12.0.1 does not have this problem, btw. With 4.10, it
creates a new web project, compiles and runs it fine.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:34 PM, aYo ~ wrote:
> Ok here's the feedback on FDT5 Linux. I did not bother with 4.10.0 as that
> is not released yet. I wanted to be
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> I could go either way on this as well. There is one advantage I can think
> of that addChromeElement et al has over the IChrome interface.
>
> Suppose you want to put a non-standard chrome component into a Container's
> chrome space? For example
Hi,
Did the steps as suggested and looks like it totally stuffed trunk up. I would
of expected "git diff origin/master" to show no difference from the release
branch.
Justin
On 7/26/13 5:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> 1. Folks using ResourceModules via flashvars will get exceptions. The
>> population affected is small, but enough folks use them that already two
>> folks on our dev list have said they are affected.
>But your fix fixes this right?
Yes
>
>>
On 7/26/13 5:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> +1 to reverting the change. There could be thirdparty components for
>>which
>> the source code may not be readily accessible. This could be a big
>> problem.
>Not really there's is a work around ie revert the change in the SDK and
>recomp
On 7/26/13 6:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> +var localeChainList:String =
>> +SystemManagerGlobals.parameters["localeChain"];
>
>Possibly RTE here?
Possibly, but I don't think so. That code has been there for a long time
and shouldn't run now unless
On 7/26/13 7:06 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
>
>> I could go either way on this as well. There is one advantage I can
>>think
>> of that addChromeElement et al has over the IChrome interface.
>>
>> Suppose you want to put a non-standard ch
Crap. What kinds of diffs does it now find?
On 7/26/13 7:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Did the steps as suggested and looks like it totally stuffed trunk up. I
>would of expected "git diff origin/master" to show no difference from the
>release branch.
>
>Justin
>
>
HI,
There's a lot (1000+ lines) - some make sense (sort of I guess) but other
changes don't and I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is.
Rather than past all the text here just do a:
git diff origin/release4.10.0 origin/master
Given that we tag releases - there is the question why we nee
78 matches
Mail list logo
