Ugh. Thanks for checking it out. So the SDK name still showed up as 4.10? I suppose we could just leave the version element at 4.9.9 with a comment saying we had to do that for FB. But I wonder if the version element is used elsewhere?
-Alex On 7/26/13 7:52 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> wrote: >With following steps I could create new flash builder projects again >with no errors. > >1) Changed <version> element in flex-sdk-description.xml from 4.10.0 to >4.9.0 >2) Configure SDK in Flash Builder >3) Create new Project with newly configured SDK > >My sdk was installed with Apache Flex Installer. So I would say the >problem ist the version number. > >On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> In one of the past releases, we messed up the core.swc build script and >> didn't catch it until after release. It seems like we should make sure >> this is in fact a bug in FB and not some other thing we messed up that >>is >> under our control before releasing. So somebody should try a build >>with a >> 4.9.9 version number just to be sure. I'll see if I can get another >> computer going on it. >> >> Clearly we all have different opinions on quality, but a problem in the >> first thing a newbie tries with FB New Project wouldn't make us look >>very >> good and attract more people, especially if we can find a way around it, >> and shipping with known regressions doesn't help either. Very recently, >> OpenOffice also voted to release and was in the process of copying their >> bits to dist when they stopped because an issue was found. Just because >> you have the votes doesn't mean you have to deploy those bits. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 7/26/13 7:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>And I really have to say this is not exactly a show stopper or critical >>>issue. This need to put into perspective as there a very simple work >>>around eg just fix/edit the code yourself. It's an inconvenience at >>>most, >>>nothing to do with the SDK itself, and not everyone uses Flash Builder. >>>I'm not sure we can ever fix the issue, without revering the version >>>number to 4.9.2 or something silly. We should be asking Adobe to fix it >>>not using it as yet another excuse to not make a release. >>> >>>The vote for the release candidates has passed and was successful. As >>>the >>>release manager I'm willing to give a couple of days grace to see if any >>>solutions for any "outstanding" issues can be found and consider >>>creating >>>a new release candidate to put up for another vote, but beyond they can >>>go into the next point release, anything more than that is really going >>>against Apache policy. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Justin >>
