With following steps I could create new flash builder projects again
with no errors.

1) Changed <version> element in flex-sdk-description.xml from 4.10.0 to 4.9.0
2) Configure SDK in Flash Builder
3) Create new Project with newly configured SDK

My sdk was installed with Apache Flex Installer. So I would say the
problem ist the version number.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> In one of the past releases, we messed up the core.swc build script and
> didn't catch it until after release.  It seems like we should make sure
> this is in fact a bug in FB and not some other thing we messed up that is
> under our control before releasing.  So somebody should try a build with a
> 4.9.9 version number just to be sure.  I'll see if I can get another
> computer going on it.
>
> Clearly we all have different opinions on quality, but a problem in the
> first thing a newbie tries with FB New Project wouldn't make us look very
> good and attract more people, especially if we can find a way around it,
> and shipping with known regressions doesn't help either.  Very recently,
> OpenOffice also voted to release and was in the process of copying their
> bits to dist when they stopped because an issue was found.  Just because
> you have the votes doesn't mean you have to deploy those bits.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/26/13 7:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>And I really have to say this is not exactly a show stopper or critical
>>issue. This need to put into perspective as there a very simple work
>>around eg just fix/edit the code yourself. It's an inconvenience at most,
>>nothing to do with the SDK itself, and not everyone uses Flash Builder.
>>I'm not sure we can ever fix the issue, without revering the version
>>number to 4.9.2 or something silly. We should be asking Adobe to fix it
>>not using it as yet another excuse to not make a release.
>>
>>The vote for the release candidates has passed and was successful. As the
>>release manager I'm willing to give a couple of days grace to see if any
>>solutions for any "outstanding" issues can be found and consider creating
>>a new release candidate to put up for another vote, but beyond they can
>>go into the next point release, anything more than that is really going
>>against Apache policy.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Justin
>

Reply via email to