Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/25/15, 12:42 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Let’s discuss the alice.xml file header. It still seems to me that >>having >> the Apache header is correct as the text was significantly modified to >> have TextFlow markup in it. > >The modification are trivial, and non creative as they

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
Why is this a problem? On Jan 25, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Jar in version control: > ./ant/flexUnitTasks.jar > > Swcs in version control: > ./libs/flexunit-cilistener.swc > ./libs/flexunit-uilistener.swc > ./libs/flexunit.swc

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
I just added the headers to all these files except whatnot.txt which does not require any headers. I also removed the tanach.xml file which is questionable and not needed. As far as the public domain attribution goes, I don’t care which way we go on that. I think anything is fine. On Jan 25, 2

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
I’m not really convinced we need attribution at all. The content is not being released as a component of anything. Why can’t we have a general mention in NOTICE? If someone wants to put attribution in the source files, I have no problem with that. It does seem like a waste of effort though. On

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Let’s discuss the alice.xml file header. It still seems to me that having > the Apache header is correct as the text was significantly modified to > have TextFlow markup in it. The modification are trivial, and non creative as they basically just adding paragraph marks at the start and en

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > According to the link that Justin provided, there’s no need to add anything > to the source file for public domain content. That's incorrect. You can't just replace licenses with an Apache one unless they allow it. > The only thing that should probably be done, is add something to the NO

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/25/15, 12:12 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >According to the link that Justin provided, there’s no need to add >anything to the source file for public domain content. > >The only thing that should probably be done, is add something to the >NOTICE that the tests contain public domain content. Nothing

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Harbs
According to the link that Justin provided, there’s no need to add anything to the source file for public domain content. The only thing that should probably be done, is add something to the NOTICE that the tests contain public domain content. Nothing else needs to/should be done. On Jan 25, 2

Re: TLF version control/license issues

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks for the list. I haven’t looked to verify any of it. Let’s discuss the alice.xml file header. It still seems to me that having the Apache header is correct as the text was significantly modified to have TextFlow markup in it. I think all that is missing is some comment or text in there pr