Hi, > Let’s discuss the alice.xml file header. It still seems to me that having > the Apache header is correct as the text was significantly modified to > have TextFlow markup in it.
The modification are trivial, and non creative as they basically just adding paragraph marks at the start and end of each line. My understanding is that the licence header only needs to change to Apache if significant creative changes are made. If the header is changed then that also needs to be put into the NOTICE file. Do we want to do that on a file by file basis I assume not? > Can you post what you think the header should be? Something simple along the lines of: "Content taken form Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll. Now in the public domain." But it may depend on where the content was actually original from, for instance look at the header and legal footer on this [1] > And can you explain why it should be different than the way we handled the > CC content in Tour De > Flex? Perhaps that's wrong as well and needs fixing, but at least the original license is mentioned in the file and it's also mentioned in NOTICE. Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11/11-h/11-h.htm
