Hi,
> Are you saying that you check in, the version number files with the versions
> in them, create a tag
Yes, although looks like I also missed it on occasion.
> , then revert those changes?
No need to revert as you change the version number after a release is done in
preparation for the next
I think I tagged the wrong commit. There will definitely be an RC2 and
I'll try to get it right then.
Regarding the version files, I'm just following the release guide? Did I
miss that step? Are you saying that you check in files with the versions
in them, create a tag, then revert those change
On 6/25/14 10:26 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>
>> - compc/mxmlc version incorrect (both report 4.12.0)
>>
>> I asked earlier whether you had FLEX_HOME pointing to 4.12.0. In my
>> tests, the version number was correct.
>
>Why would FLEX_HOME have any effect inside the FlexSDK directory? This
Hi,
> I can look at this more in depth later, but are you sure this isn't always
> the case with past releases?
I've not checked them all but when I was RM I checked that this was the case
and checked in the version files before creating a tag.
But it more than just the version files here.
Just
On 6/25/14 9:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> So, I'm satisfied the gif and png files we bundle are not from the
>> projects not mentioned in NOTICE and therefore NOTICE is correct.
>
>If you can tell me where they are from I'll be satisfied. It seems
>unlikely that the project hand made
Hi,
> So, I'm satisfied the gif and png files we bundle are not from the
> projects not mentioned in NOTICE and therefore NOTICE is correct.
If you can tell me where they are from I'll be satisfied. It seems unlikely
that the project hand made a flag for every country.
Justin
On 6/25/14 3:44 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>We have a set of files in our repo that end up in the source package.
>>Feel
>> free to compare that set against Batik 1.7 which AFAIK, is not bundled
>>in
>> the source package.
>
>I think there is a (minor) issue here for instance we have these bund
Hi Justin,
I can't find mention of some items in your vote in the discuss thread.
Can you repeat the info here?
- code in RC1 doesn't match tag apache-flex-sdk-4.13RC1 (RELEASE_NOTES,
Version.as files + others)
What were some of the content diffs?
- compc/mxmlc version incorrect (both report 4.1
Hi Alex,
I have tested my production level Flex AIR Mobile and Desktop projects using
Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1 + AIR 14, they are all good, haven't found any compile-time
or runtime issues.
DarkStone
2014-06-25
At 2014-06-24 00:26:44, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>This is the discussion thread.
>
>
Hi,
> Are we looking at the same Velocity NOTICE? My copy just says:
> "This product includes software developed by The Apache Software
> Foundation (http://www.apache.org/)."
Yes. I can't find anything that say it must be included so lets leave it as it
is.
I find it rather odd that you can't
On 6/25/14 12:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> The Velocity NOTICE appears to just contain the standard ASF notice, so
>>I
>> don't believe we have to mention it?
>My understanding is yes it needs to be mentioned.
>
>> I'm not seeing how the "deps of deps" section would change that.
>It
HI,
> The Velocity NOTICE appears to just contain the standard ASF notice, so I
> don't believe we have to mention it?
My understanding is yes it needs to be mentioned.
> I'm not seeing how the "deps of deps" section would change that.
It depends on what their NOTICES contain.
> Also from [1]: "
ContentHolder.fla was approved by mentors.
The other files I will deal with for the next RC.
Thanks for finding those.
-Alex
On 6/24/14 9:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Decided to look though the binaries images and the like we have in our
>source release.
>
>This image includes the Ad
On 6/24/14 11:45 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Shoudl the source releae contain enough to make a release?
Don't think that's a requirement (policy only says 'build' not 'release'),
but I don't have any objection to adding that to the source-package.
-Alex
On 6/24/14 11:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It would help me, and maybe others, if you would propose fixes, instead
>>of
>> just pointing out problems and making the RM guess as to what will
>>satisfy
>> you.
>
>It about satisfying the requirements as mandated by Apache not me.
>
>The
Hi,
Shoudl the source releae contain enough to make a release?
From the source package and following the instructions in README I'm getting
the release build failed with:
binary-package-tgz:
[tar] Building tar:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlex4.13RC1/apache-flex-sdk-4.13.0-src/ou
Hi,
> It would help me, and maybe others, if you would propose fixes, instead of
> just pointing out problems and making the RM guess as to what will satisfy
> you.
It about satisfying the requirements as mandated by Apache not me.
The issue looks obvious to me - ie our NOTICE is missing informa
On 6/24/14 8:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>- RELEASE_NOTES should these be here as they are installer fixes not SDK
>fixes?
> FLEX-34304 Wrong version of AIR / FP installed
> FLEX-34303 Installer licenses refer to wrong product
> FLEX-34302 Installer not cleaning up after i
It would help me, and maybe others, if you would propose fixes, instead of
just pointing out problems and making the RM guess as to what will satisfy
you.
On 6/24/14 9:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Not sure that our NOTICE is 100% correct re batic and velocity. While it
>mentions batic,
Hi,
Not sure that our NOTICE is 100% correct re batic and velocity. While it
mentions batic, it doesn't mention velocity and both batic and velocity include
a NOTICE file. Not everything in batic NOTICE has been bubbled up. [1]
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
Hi,
Decided to look though the binaries images and the like we have in our source
release.
This image includes the Adobe Flex logo which is probably needs to be changed.
./asdoc/templates/images/P_AlternativeMetadataIndicator_30x28_N.png
We have the following binary files in the source relea
Hi,
There some minor issues with README / RELEASE_NOTES
- README states "30,000 installs of Apache Flex" this is incorrect
- README "binary installtion"
- README AIR kit URL should be version 14
- README under flash player globals it states that "These can be used with
Apache Flex but not all ha
Except the typo in the readme and release note I mentioned, all the steps of
the script are ok, can't do more tests before Friday though. :P
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
>
dn't it be binary distribution or kit instead of binary installation ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:36:52 +
>
> Try i
Is this normal ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:05:27 +0100
>
> > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> > en
it manually to a +0.1 ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug suppo
e: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> enough for a 4.13 release.
>
> Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the
> differences from 4.
30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
enough for a 4.13 release.
Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the
differences from 4.12.1 section
Differences from Apache Flex 4.12.1 include:
AIR and Flash Player support
---
Hi,
Look at the list of changes it does seem more like a 4.12.2 rather than a
4.13.0. What do other people think?
Justin
29 matches
Mail list logo
