On 6/25/14 12:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>HI, > >> The Velocity NOTICE appears to just contain the standard ASF notice, so >>I >> don't believe we have to mention it? >My understanding is yes it needs to be mentioned. > >> I'm not seeing how the "deps of deps" section would change that. >It depends on what their NOTICES contain. Are we looking at the same Velocity NOTICE? My copy just says: "This product includes software developed by The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/)." And like I said [1] says: "Bundling Other ASF ProductsIt is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation." Please show a chain of logic with quotes that explain [1] indicates that Velocity needs mention in NOTICE. I just cannot see it. > >> Also from [1]: "As far as LICENSE and NOTICE are concerned, only bundled >> bits matter." >Yep hence my question re what part of batic do we actually include? We have a set of files in our repo that end up in the source package. Feel free to compare that set against Batik 1.7 which AFAIK, is not bundled in the source package. I personally don't feel the itch to question the mentor's conclusions at this time. -Alex
