OK. Flex-sdk and flex-tlf pass. I ran out of time working on flex-falcon.
Will pick it up in about 9 hours.
Feel free to hack away in-between. What do we have to do to make Jenkins
a public url?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/21/14 5:18 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 4/21/14 4:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppir
On 4/21/14 4:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>The job needs to run on a slave instance (same machine is fine) to have
>access to the windowing system.
>
>More importantly, Jenkins running as a service will not be able access the
>display. The slave needs to be configured to start via JNLP
On Apr 21, 2014 2:39 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2014 1:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> >
> > Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
> > flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
> > display but that's not helping.
>
On Apr 21, 2014 1:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
> flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
> display but that's not helping.
>
> Is there something else I need to do?
The job needs to run on a sl
Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
display but that's not helping.
Is there something else I need to do?
-Alex
On 4/20/14 11:22 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi Erik, Om,
>
>I actually spent m
ny sponsoring a vm and
>>using
>> that to influence votes ... well I guess it was a little paranoid, but a
>> valid thought)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com ]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 21.
e paranoid, but a
> valid thought)
>
> Chris
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com ]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. April 2014 08:22
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Build Servers
>
> Hi Erik, Om,
>
> I actually spent m
I don't know if you can Sysprep a virtual OS your remoting into...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 2:46 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build Servers
On Sun, Apr 20,
Hi Erik, Om,
I actually spent my evenings this weekend trying to set it up. Figured
I'd learn something about Jenkins and Azure in the process.
I'll post the info on private@ and we should just send emails when/if you
guys have time to spend on it. I'll be poking at it for another 40
minutes or
OK, will ask. I'll be highly surprised if it an issue. I think if it
were up to Roy there wouldn't be any builds.a.o.
-Alex
On 4/20/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Are we sure it''s OK to serve nightlies off non ASF machines? May want to
>confirm before putting time and effort into
Let's not make every discussion on this list about bylaws and regulations.
If I find time, I'll build the VM and finally get the CI nightmare that
Apache itself provides behind me. If the lawyers decide that the Apache
servers are better than the VM (lol) then we won't serve nightlies from the
VM,
Hi,
Are we sure it''s OK to serve nightlies off non ASF machines? May want to
confirm before putting time and effort into this.
Justin
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'.
>
> Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your plan
> to add more Mustella nodes...
>
>
Great. Can you make sure that the VMs are clone-able? You might have to
cr
Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'.
Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your plan
to add more Mustella nodes...
EdB
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> >
On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI VM.
> "All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the VM,
> after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds.
>
> Free from 'build
Alex,
I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI VM.
"All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the VM,
after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds.
Free from 'builds@a.o', free at last!
EdB
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:56 AM,
Welcome to my frustration ;-)
I'm probably naive, but I think our VMs are pretty secure. We're running on
Azure, we are fully patched on all the software we use (Win2008, Apache
Server, Java, Jenkins and the various players) and we expose a minimal
attach surface (ports, access controls etc.). I'd
After seeing this latest run of failures, does anybody still want to rely
on build.a.o for anything?
If anything, we should ask builds@ to email their list when they do
critical security upgrades so we can try to keep up on our build machine.
I think there's a chance that a multi-project server is
HI,
> Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing official
> nightly dev builds?
+1 We can resonably trust infra machines to be secure and that non one has
fiddled with the nightly builds. Our own set up machines are likely to be less
secure and there's a small risk that somet
I just want to add something. Being that this is a open source project. We
could get a free license for Bamboo that allows unlimited remote agents.
Bamboo is much much much easier to add remote agents(windows, linux, osx)
than Jenkins, Hudson, etc. As the agents don't need to have any server
softw
OK, thanks. It sounds like the three of us have consensus that we'd like
to do builds on our own box. If Apache can provide us with our own box
that's great, but otherwise we'll do it on our own.
If Gavin feels slighted by our pulling out of Builds, feel free to tell
him that, IMO, it isn't that
+1 I'm all fed up with 'builds@a.o' (you could probably tell from my emails
;-)) and it's time we get reliable CI going.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
> turning it into the 'official' Flex C
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Can you or Om pursue that angle?
I am planning on catching up with Gavin on IRC. I will ask him about
this.
Thanks,
Om
> To me the key things we want are a
> Flex-only box so we don't have to worry about pollution from other
> projects,
On 4/17/14 12:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM
>>and
>> turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
>> instance and see if it falls behi
Can you or Om pursue that angle? To me the key things we want are a
Flex-only box so we don't have to worry about pollution from other
projects, and total administration control. Infra can have admin rights
and can forbid us from doing certain network/security things, but
otherwise, we need to be
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
> turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
> instance and see if it falls behind as we add more checkintests on the
> FlexJS side, and if w
They did say that they have some relationship with Microsoft for Azure
boxes as well. Nobody has taken them up on it, but it might be something
to ask -- that way you don't have to do it on your own dime when we go
over..
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, so what
OK, so what do others think? I'm totally fine with taking my Azure VM and
turning it into the 'official' Flex CI server. We can try a 'medium'
instance and see if it falls behind as we add more checkintests on the
FlexJS side, and if we need to upgrade to 'large' I'll pay for it myself.
It just
At "large", an instance runs at about $5 a day. You get something like $150
a month, so can't run over the free part all that much.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Max 10 - 20 Euros.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Erik,
Max 10 - 20 Euros.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Erik,
>
> If you didn't switch over to medium during the month, what do you think
> you'd end up paying each month?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/17/14 11:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >Nothing.
> >
> >If you run a "medium
Erik,
If you didn't switch over to medium during the month, what do you think
you'd end up paying each month?
-Alex
On 4/17/14 11:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Nothing.
>
>If you run a "medium" instance, it will be more than plenty powerful to do
>all build tasks whenever needed. And with the
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> How much would it cost me to use my Azure VM instead of the Apache build
> server?
>
Depends on how much you use the machine. Mustella will probably cost a lot
to run. Occasional sdk builds per checkin will be much less.
If you use your co
Nothing.
If you run a "medium" instance, it will be more than plenty powerful to do
all build tasks whenever needed. And with the "free credits" that come with
the committer MSDN licences you can run a "medium" instance for about 1.5
months every month ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:45 PM,
How much would it cost me to use my Azure VM instead of the Apache build
server?
On 4/17/14 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
>> server on my Azure VM vs relyi
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
> server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
>
>
One disadvantage is that with Azure VM, we tend to run out of free credits
around the 20th of each month. Erik usually
I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
At Apache, we keep seeing other projects have build issues and require
configuration changes that block us. And as Om just pointed out, once
Infra has some other fire to fight, we
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I was talking to some of the people at a.o. infra on IRC and they mentioned
> that they have a new Windows VM that they launched for CI services... They
> are looking for people to help them test it out and get it setup. Do we
> hav
37 matches
Mail list logo
