On May 28, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of being
>> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project? Personally, I'd
>> be ok with Apache Flex being a war
Hi,
I don't see any issue with it living in it own repo under flex (like utilities
or flexunit). I don't think anyone is suggesting we bundle it up with the Flex
SDK release so you woudl still be free to choose any framework or none if you
want.
Thanks,
Justin
Om is pointing my main concern with Swiz donation. The main point here is
that Swiz 2.0.0 Beta has many good and beautiful ideas about AOP that are
very new to web client technologies. Something that people are using from
long time in java could be first citizen in Flex making an huge difference.
t
I do not agree to you. There are a lot of ways to approach an application
development, some may be of your liking others will not be. But there is no
need to force one of them as the Flex sdk one.
I would rather prefer to maintain all those as separate libraries for anyone to
choose the one he
+1 on the JIRA on another list, do we need a vote on that, or can we
just ask INFRA for it?
Maybe this discussion should be in a separate thread, however...
EdB
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I would prefer JIRA activity to be on another list. I've heard from
I would prefer JIRA activity to be on another list. I've heard from quite
a few people in my User Group that they dropped off dev@ people of the
noise of JIRA. I think those of us who want to know what is committed
will subscribe to those (plus, it makes filtering those messages into a
separate
On 5/28/13 10:25 AM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of being
>> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project? Personally,
>>I'd
>> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse
On 5/28/2013 11:33 AM, dude wrote:
Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
I would not like to see either integrated into Apache Flex.
However, I have no qualms about it being donated and co-existing along
side Apache Flex.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneu
I like the donation of the Swiz framework. I use both swiz(for work) and
parsley(personal projects) and I am ambivalent at this point. What I would
really like to see the best part of these frameworks (and maeby others like
spring-actionscript, robotlegs, etc.) integrated into Flex.
I am talking
Greg,
I see why you might be worried about future additional projects, but
the sub-projects you mention (Falcon, SDK, FlexJS) are very much part
of one and the same project. Other sub-projects are purely for
supporting the community and various workflows (Installer, Maven) and
are "too small" to m
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of being
> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project? Personally, I'd
> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code
> even if there is
I like the idea of a vote. I don't think the community is divided
about 'having' Swiz, it seems the division is more 'what to do with
it'. Please let the VOTE be clear about this.
EdB
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> I think this would require a vote thread since it seems
I agree
On 28 May 2013 17:28, "dude" wrote:
> None of these frameworks should be integrated into Apache Flex, I guess
> everyone agrees with that.
>
> FYI: Parsley has been abandoned by its creator as well and there is no
> further development atm (afaik). It is licenced under Apache License 2.0
I think this would require a vote thread since it seems to have community
opinion divided.
I'll give a breath for some hours to open a VOTE thread if you all are ok
with that.
2013/5/28 dude
> None of these frameworks should be integrated into Apache Flex, I guess
> everyone agrees with that.
None of these frameworks should be integrated into Apache Flex, I guess
everyone agrees with that.
FYI: Parsley has been abandoned by its creator as well and there is no
further development atm (afaik). It is licenced under Apache License 2.0
and available here https://github.com/spicefactory
Am
Top level application flex frameworks should be incubated at Apache as
independent projects to Apache FLEX to avoid missunderstandings and be
politically correct.
2013/5/28 Avi Kessner
> I don't use swiz but it seems silly to reject a donation because of a fear
> of what might happen. It's eas
On 5/28/13 8:39 AM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Roland Zwaga
>wrote:
>
>> On 28 May 2013 17:33, dude wrote:
>>
>> > Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Personally, the above response shows exactly the reason why I think
I don't use swiz but it seems silly to reject a donation because of a fear
of what might happen. It's easy enough to keep it separate, and if it's
not supported anywhere projects using it will likely ditch the flex
framework completely
On 28 May 2013 18:49, "Carlos Velasco"
wrote:
> Adding a to
Adding a top level applicaction framework to the APACHE FLEX project
suitcase will somehow set is as the "facto standard" accepted framework to
build applications using the FLEX SDK, or at least will create that
understanding between developers.
So I think top level application frameworks must not
I don't know the actual state of RobotLegs, Parsley or others... Swiz is
without maintenance and needs attention and 2.0 could bring a great
improvment not reached for any other framework. This doesn't mean any base
sdk integration and dependency. We could make the same with other projects
that nee
Hi Greg,
other people behind the project are Ben and Brian (maybe more other
contributions), but all files are behind Apache License 2.0 and seems
there's no authors specifications so maybe they already agreed with the
Apache License 2.0, but I'll ask them on the swiz list to get it clear
2013/5/
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote:
> On 28 May 2013 17:33, dude wrote:
>
> > Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
> >
> >
>
> Personally, the above response shows exactly the reason why I think there
> shouldn't be any
> application framework integ
On 28 May 2013 17:33, dude wrote:
> Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
>
>
Personally, the above response shows exactly the reason why I think there
shouldn't be any
application framework integrated into Apache Flex. Too many opinions on
the matter...
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:33 AM, dude wrote:
> Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
>
That's the only concern I'd have about the donation. I know Swiz is one
framework among several. So we'd have to manage it carefully to keep from
alienating part of the community.
Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex.
Am 28.05.2013 16:52, schrieb Carlos Rovira:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose the donation of Swiz Framework to Apache Flex.
>
> https://github.com/swiz/swiz-framework/
> https://swizframework.jira.com/wiki/display/SWIZ/Home
>
> The r
> * Swiz stopped development in 2.0.0 beta that brings AOP to Flex Framework.
> The problem with this implementation is that is not ready for producction
> since it needs changes in Flex Compiler and in AS3 Commons ByteCode to get
> it work properly.
>
>
Hi there,
I'm the author of as3commons-byte
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose the donation of Swiz Framework to Apache Flex.
>
This would be awesome in my opinion :-) Just remember that the donation
process could get complicated if Chris doesn't hold the copyright to all
the code to be donat
Hi,
I want to propose the donation of Swiz Framework to Apache Flex.
https://github.com/swiz/swiz-framework/
https://swizframework.jira.com/wiki/display/SWIZ/Home
The reasons behind the propossal are:
* Swiz Framework is a mature microarquitecure for Apache Flex that
complements it to build app
28 matches
Mail list logo
