On 5/28/13 8:39 AM, "Greg Reddin" <gred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Roland Zwaga ><rol...@stackandheap.com>wrote: > >> On 28 May 2013 17:33, dude <d...@atheist.com> wrote: >> >> > Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex. >> > >> > >> >> Personally, the above response shows exactly the reason why I think >>there >> shouldn't be any >> application framework integrated into Apache Flex. Too many opinions on >> the matter... >> > >But, there's no reason we can't integrate it as a sub-project or incubate >it. If it develops a community it can become its own TLP. Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of being integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project? Personally, I'd be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code even if there is no active development for it. That way folks looking for the latest code can know that they can come to Apache to get a legal copy and ask questions on the mailing list that have a chance of being answered. Or do we have to commit to releasing this code on occasion? I agree with not wanting to "integrate" any application-level framework with the Apache Flex SDK releases. I don't think we want to appear to be promoting one over the other. That said, I believe somewhere in the archives, the person behind Parsley announced that he was no longer maintaining it. Maybe it could also be donated to Apache. Also, does a donation like Swiz need a whole Software Grant or is an email trail sufficient? -Alex
