Greg,

I see why you might be worried about future additional projects, but
the sub-projects you mention (Falcon, SDK, FlexJS) are very much part
of one and the same project. Other sub-projects are purely for
supporting the community and various workflows (Installer, Maven) and
are "too small" to make sense on their own.

I don't know much about Swiz, but what I know seems to points in the
direction of "should exist separate but next to the SDK".

As long as the various sub-projects are strongly tied to the central
project (FlexSDK), I don't think we are in danger of fragmenting and
I'm convinced that the synergy between them will bring additional
value to all of them.

EdB



On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Greg Reddin <gred...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of being
>> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project?  Personally, I'd
>> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code
>> even if there is no active development for it.
>
>
> There's a couple of things to consider here:
>
> 1) The board does not favor "umbrella" projects. Jakarta was an umbrella
> project and it contained (at one time) Struts, Tomcat, Commons, JMeter, and
> a whole bunch of Java-related projects. It became clear that the Jakarta
> community was too fragmented to get consensus so it spun off all those
> projects into TLPs. That could easily start to happen here.
>
> 2) This mailing list is already too high-traffic to follow. Practically, we
> could probably already split up the Flex project into multiple projects. It
> seems to me that folks are starting to gel around different efforts, like
> getting new releases of the SDK, vs. compilers, etc. It could be that we
> need to form new PMCs or it could be that we just need to enact
> sub-projects. But we have to be careful with sub-projects to avoid point 1
> above.
>
> It's hard to know where the breaking point is. Probably it has to do with
> whether the community is having a hard time pushing out releases or just
> whether it "feels" fragmented. I'm not proposing that we break up now, but
> we should probably be thinking about whether the Falcon project, for
> example, has its own distinct community from the SDK.
>
> Greg



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to