I agree On 28 May 2013 17:28, "dude" <d...@atheist.com> wrote:
> None of these frameworks should be integrated into Apache Flex, I guess > everyone agrees with that. > > FYI: Parsley has been abandoned by its creator as well and there is no > further development atm (afaik). It is licenced under Apache License 2.0 > and available here https://github.com/spicefactory > > Am 28.05.2013 17:44, schrieb Carlos Rovira: > > I don't know the actual state of RobotLegs, Parsley or others... Swiz is > > without maintenance and needs attention and 2.0 could bring a great > > improvment not reached for any other framework. This doesn't mean any > base > > sdk integration and dependency. We could make the same with other > projects > > that need a home. This should be driven by community necessity and should > > have people behind the effort. > > > > 2013/5/28 Greg Reddin <gred...@gmail.com> > > > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> On 28 May 2013 17:33, dude <d...@atheist.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Good luck, but I'd rather see Parsley integrated into Apache Flex. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Personally, the above response shows exactly the reason why I think > there > >>> shouldn't be any > >>> application framework integrated into Apache Flex. Too many opinions > on > >>> the matter... > >>> > >> > >> But, there's no reason we can't integrate it as a sub-project or > incubate > >> it. If it develops a community it can become its own TLP. > >> > > > > > > >
