Hi Folks,
There have been other threads dealing with last minute issues that
probably should have been in this thread. However, I think all issues are
addressed, but it would be good to have other PMC members review the
nightly build before we start cutting release candidates. We are hoping
to g
On 7/2/16, 7:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>indeed, when building most of the time is spent by the closure compiler
>compiling the release build for the examples. It would be great if it was
>possible to skip this last build. Especially as I package the content of
>the war file
On 7/2/16, 10:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
>> need headers.
>
>IMO if it source code it need a header, otherwise how do we know how the
>patch is licensed or where it come from?
>
>This same issue was also brough
Hi,
> IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
> need headers.
IMO if it source code it need a header, otherwise how do we know how the patch
is licensed or where it come from?
This same issue was also brought up on an incubating release recently. [1]
Thanks,
Jus
IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
need headers. And because the patches ares a modification to CreateJS, it
is ASF content, not CreateJS content, so I didn't mention CreateJS in the
LICENSE since none of their IP is bundled. In the binary package,
CreateJS is
Hi,
I took a quick look at the source releases:
For Falcon:
- The LICENSE file is missing MIT licensed creatjs / easeljs / tweenjs [1][2]
- I’m not sure how some files have this (e.g. [X]) is "Copyright 2001-2005 The
Apache Software Foundation”. The dates are odd and it’s unusual for a source
16:44:34
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
On 7/1/16, 3:15 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just report that I changed to maven 3.3.9 to get compiler running, and
>must
>use
On 7/1/16, 3:15 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just report that I changed to maven 3.3.9 to get compiler running, and
>must
>use -DskipTests (I suppose this is ok right now)
>Then, externs where build easily and quick, and finaly I could run asjs
>withou
Auftrag von Carlos
Rovira
Gesendet: Samstag, 2. Juli 2016 00:15:25
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
Hi,
just report that I changed to maven 3.3.9 to get compiler running, and must
use -DskipTests (I suppose this is ok right now)
Then, externs
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Alex Harui
> Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 16:21:25
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
> Can you summarize your problems that you need help with?
>
>
esendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 16:21:25
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
Can you summarize your problems that you need help with?
-Alex
On 7/1/16, 7:18 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Even in IntelliJ you can specify that location,
7;d really like to finish some more examples [?]
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Alex Harui
>Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 16:13:49
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
>
>
>On 7/1/16,
6:13:49
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
On 7/1/16, 6:59 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well in Flexmojos I had always put them there and that was the default
>position. So that should prove that it doesn't cause any prob
On 7/1/16, 6:59 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well in Flexmojos I had always put them there and that was the default
>position. So that should prove that it doesn't cause any problems.
I could not find any way to specify the location of the -app.xml file in
Flash Builder. I think FB and maybe
>"src/main/air"?
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Christofer Dutz
>Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 15:23:01
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
>Just noticed that the resources and sources are mixed in the
hris
>
>
>Von: Christofer Dutz
>Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 15:23:01
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
>Just noticed that the resources and sources are mixed in the examples.
>Could w
... And while at it ... move the air application descriptors to "src/main/air"?
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 15:23:01
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
Just noticed that the
l.com im Auftrag von Carlos
Rovira
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 08:49:08
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
HI Alex,
I'm on mac. I'll try later today to install latest maven and report what
happen, in the mean while, I'll share t
HI Alex,
I'm on mac. I'll try later today to install latest maven and report what
happen, in the mean while, I'll share the error of the last report (I
forgot to post it in all):
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - FlexJS .. SUCCESS [1.925s]
[INFO] A
On 6/30/16, 1:12 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>So, I only run the first line for falcon, and I need to run other two ok?
Yes you need to run all 3.
>
>Should I try with at least 3.3.1?
I'm using 3.2.3 on Mac. Are you on Mac or Win?
-Alex
Datum: 30.06.16 20:08 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
> Ops!
>
> [INFO]
>
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [I
CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
Ops!
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - ASJS SUCCESS [0.766s]
[INFO] frameworks SU
e gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Carlos Rovira
Datum: 30.06.16 19:45 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
Hi,
what's the minimal maven version to test? I should go to latest (3.3.9) or
I can use other like for e
Ops!
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - ASJS SUCCESS [0.766s]
[INFO] frameworks SUCCESS [0.021s]
[INFO] projects .
Hi,
amazing, just so easy thanks to the hard work of you guys during several
weeks.
Tested with 3.1.1. result:
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - FlexJS .. SUCCESS
[4:41.490s]
Hi,
what's the minimal maven version to test? I should go to latest (3.3.9) or
I can use other like for example 3.1.1 or other?
Thanks and amazing work btw! :)
2016-06-30 6:30 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> It will likely be at least another week (probably two) until the first RC
> so there is time
It will likely be at least another week (probably two) until the first RC
so there is time to iron this stuff out. Where are the instructions for
building/testing NPM install? I don't think we did any big changes to the
folder structure.
-Alex
On 6/29/16, 5:47 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf o
Sorry, I have not been following the maven stuff closely. Will we need to
change how the npm install stuff works? Any chance someone can test it to
see what breaks?
I hope to find some time starting this weekend to get back into FlexJS work.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Har
Hi,
After helping Chris spend the last several weeks on Maven for FlexJS and
Falcon, I think we are at the point where any future changes will be
minor, so this is a re-start of the last call to examine a nightly build
for the things you usually check before you vote on a release.
And this time,
On 5/5/16, 2:48 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying a simple Hello World in IntelliJ I did at the time of the 0.6
>release (with the Josh tutorial in NExtGestAS3), now with 0.7 nigthly
>(through Flex SdK installer), and getting the same error as Ju
30 matches
Mail list logo
