+1
Checked on Windows 10
with:
Apache Maven 3.5.4
Java version: 1.8.0_181
Source package built and installed without issue via maven.
(I did not attempt to test the usage of the build.)
Source release check:
(zip files were checked)
SHA512 matches.
zip file was signed by joshtynj...@apache.or
Hi Josh,
Just a quick note to say that I will test and review the build this coming
weekend. Sorry I can't get there sooner.
-Greg
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:01 PM Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please discuss the BlazeDS 4.8.0 release candidate here and not in the vote
> thread.
>
> Thanks,
>
Just for the record: when I compiled I was using openjdk 11.0.6, so that is
the reason I did not encounter that issue.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:30 PM Yishay Weiss wrote:
> I can confirm that it compiles on windows for java 8. I’ll try to do some
> more checks later and vote. Thanks.
>
> From:
Thanks for your work on this, Josh. I followed your guide in here, and
think I covered all the required testing, and added my vote in the vote
thread
-Greg
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 5:23 AM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> At minimum, extract the source-release .zip file and run `mvn clean
> install` in the r
Vote: +1
based on following checks conducted:
-sha512 hash matches the release.zip hash
-signing key matches Josh (following
https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html)
-nothing unusual observed from README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE
files
-source code compiles without error.
-usage of
eed to run the content. Don't expect that the
> Flash Player in the browser is going to be a viable option for much
> longer...
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 1:10 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > Yes this gives some 'hope' :)
> > But it is difficult to b
l still support Flash
> player in IE11 post DEC 2020.
> I also could not get clearly interpret this blog post if this is the case.
>
> Regards,
> Shyam
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 5:27 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > That's interesting, it does sound like it might conti
That's interesting, it does sound like it might continue to be 'available'
in terms of 'function' after 2020 for player versions since June this year,
but disabled by default and not 'supported'in the old Edge and in IE11.
That interpretation is actually 'better' than I had understood it to be in
t
org.apache.royale.utils.ClassSelectorList. Can you think of a
reason why that would be needed here? I assume it should not be needed.
Thanks
Greg
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 5:40 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> Oh, I know it's still out there. But we know it is small and getting
> smaller. It is the age-old dilemma of the ne
n his
> default browser, which is IE11, and saw nothing working. It’s still out
> there.
>
> >It's interesting that in the same month as someone wants modules to work
> in IE11 we also want to get rid of IE11 support.
>
> On 5/7/20, 2:09 AM, "Greg Dove"
on 2020 so the main question is
> what will get someone migrated faster? Emulation is usually faster and
> safer than changing code paths in many places in the application and helps
> others trying to use the emulations. But some emulations (runtime property
> access) are too hard o
7, 2020 at 5:03 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Without thinking too hard, I would output a warning if someone passes
> something other than a string. Then we'll know if anybody really needs the
> more complex cases and can figure out what to do about it then.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/6/2
This question is mainly for Alex or anyone else involved in porting an
MXRoyale application.
When porting styleName='myStyleName' what is considered the best approach?
I would have assumed that styleName could simply be added to the underlying
element's classList if it is a string, so it (I assum
, I like your domain name. :-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Dec 10, 2019, at 9:12 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > This is player level emulation of [1], supporting (as much as possible)
> > direct use of legacy flash player-level (i.e. no graphics lib) drawing
> > code. So it
Here's how I am testing across machines [1] <-- that should be [2]
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:12 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> This is player level emulation of [1], supporting (as much as possible)
> direct use of legacy flash player-level (i.e. no graphics lib) drawing
> cod
> package in Basic?
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> > On Dec 10, 2019, at 4:51 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > Just some early advice that I expect to have a very close emulation of
> the
> > flash graphics API available by early January at the latest. I had a
>
Just some early advice that I expect to have a very close emulation of the
flash graphics API available by early January at the latest. I had a client
express a need for this, and I have quite a lot of progress already.
I know we have various graphics support already in Graphics and MXRoyale,
but t
I went through this not so long ago. fyi the best option I found was Opera.
It's now like Chrome, but flash debugging still worked for me. If you can't
get anything else to work, you might want to try that.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi Dannemann,
>
> If I remember
I just gave it a try (Win 10).
It's definitely not without some friction, but it works!
I think I did not realize that it had launched the downloaded 64 bit
version so I did exit and relaunch from 32 bit again before I 'got' it.
Anyhow I installed 4.16.1/Air 30 sdk sucessfully with it.
Observati
t; In doing so, the AMF code now uses the Reflection APIs that Greg Dove
> contributed. The test still only passes a String to the server, but in
> doing so, it has to wrap the String in an AsyncMessage subclass and I
> think I have watched the AMF code correctly serialize and deserialize
&g
ical to convert the current git
> repos listed above. We want to explore using GitHub's wiki and
> documentation tools.
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> If GitBox allows us to use GitHub issues, we will use that, otherwise, we
> will request a new JIRA project from Infra.
>
&g
Hi Alex, I see you are working on amf.
Not sure if you noticed already or not, but just in case I did add
class alias support methods in the reflection package for both targets. I
tested this to work the same for swf and js. (for multiple aliases etc).
registerClassAlias
getAliasByClass
getCla
I just made some changes in manual tests, including updates to the ant
scripts to be more consistent with the ant scripts in the regular examples.
I fixed a couple of issues in the GenericTests and renamed it to UnitTests
and also added a maven build for that project. It should be easy to add
maven
I guess that might help with the code minification, but it may be
irrelevant with the longer original strings with something like gzip
compression already there are so many levels to this.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Alex fyi I have wondered about breaking the cl
Alex fyi I have wondered about breaking the class strings into literal
concatenation expressions with package parts for CLASS_INFO and in the
reflection data. This should end up minifying via closure compiler much
better, I think.
e.g.
'org.'+'apache.'+'flex.'+'events.'+'Event'
On Wed, Aug 9,
or-all-comparisons-returning-false-for-ieee754-nan-values
> >>>
> >>> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/IEEE754.PDF
> >>>
> >>> My father complained about when the IBM 360 came out in the early
> 1960’s
> >> he had t
mean is that if we can somehow have the values uninitialized in
> >> JS, but in all cases where uninitialized values somehow diverge with
> >> ActionScript behavior be solved (so the use cases would behave
> >> correctly), then we’d have the advantages of undefined together
I’d prefer if we could somehow get the best of both worlds.
Sorry Harbs, but I don't get it. I think the agreement is already to 'have
the best of both worlds'.
The issue is what the default should be. I know that you don't think you
could have both behaviours as the default :).
If we take away p
Yes it does. NaN is an 'instance' of the Number type (even though it is
'Not a Number' ;) )
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> I’m not sure that I realized that NaN passes that test. Does it?
>
> > On Aug 2, 2017, at 1:12
Maybe I'll convince others eventually.
fwiw Josh, I agree with you.
I agree undefined works the same as NaN for many things for example, but it
fails on very basic things like if (x is Number) that to me is quite
wrong and would be quite unexpected for anyone expecting flexjs
actionscript to
Josh, that was the general idea with the wiki docs:
-One section for 'definitions'
-And another section for examples/archetypes with advantages/disadvantages
of each - as a form of 'guidance', emphasis on the practical, but not a
proscriptive approach.
I'm sorry I have not had time to come back
Harbs I think that jsfiddle is not working because of the missing quotes in
the bracket access.
There are a bunch of uses of the bracket access throughout the framework,
including, iirc, some things like ['flex-basis'] etc.
imo, I agree these should be using the javascript camel case properties,
I have a vague recollection of needing some deprecated annotation @expose
for static accessors to work in the past because @export did not work.
Maybe it was related?
-Greg
[sent from my phone]
On 13/07/2017 6:24 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
Well, I looked into this and this definitely falls into th
s be
> required for FlexJS.
>
> Again, though, I think this optimization isn't urgent.
>
> goog.DEBUG is already being used in Language.as.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/11/17, 4:01 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >I'll try those things, I have not tried any o
t; What happens if the compiler is run without --generate_exports? Do the
> @exports get stripped out? If yes, is there some kind of “super export”?
> There needs to be some way to invoke the app…
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Jul 11, 2017, at 11:40 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> &
In application development I would normally do this type of thing inside
CONFIG::dev
blocks, or similar, so having the possibility, as described, to exclude
development-only code (extra type checking, null checks etc) would
definitely also be helpful PAYG-wise from within the framework.
The genera
oops, that last idea won't work so well with @flexjsignorecoercion
ArrayBuffer above it :)
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
>
> In application development I would normally do this type of thing inside
> CONFIG::dev
> blocks, or similar, so having the possibil
; > >>classes.
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 7/10/17, 1:16 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Good catch.
> > >> >
> > >> >Without looking at them, I
Guys, we certainly have been here before.
>From a js release 'size' perspective, I don't think it matters whether we
use constants or liteterals, I think the main difference is that if the
static const exists it will also be included in the release output as I
expect it has an @export annotation.
I noticed a problem with VerticalFlexLayout in IE11 (and presumably older
IE browsers).
The JS output causing problems has
child.dispatchEvent(new Event("layoutNeeded"));
The reason is that the org.apache.flex.events.Event import is missing from
the
COMPILE::JS build scope
So it is falling back
I took a quick look at SearchBox.mxml
there are at least some basic xml errors in it.
xmlns:ns="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/svg> <- missing quote
wrote:
> Allen,
>
> SearchBox.mxml - look good to me - of course if you have ISearchable - but
> I
> don't see it. Apart of that you have in this
I just glanced back at your mxml. Not sure if this will help... but you
could try moving the fx:Script tag outside the HContainer tag so it is top
level inside your mxml. This seems more conventional although I am not sure
whether it is the cause of the compiler issues you are seeing or not.
-Greg
>> Well Object is always THE base class. It may not be known what the
actual base class should be and it is certainly not flexible to always
create a base class just to have a one to satisfy the rule.
>Nor would I suggest that. There are some cases where creating a new class
with properties is goi
Really pleased to see the input from you all, and thanks for the revisions
and corrections so far.
"To me it's a bit difficult to digest in its current format. I would prefer
to
see a list of design patterns with descriptions of concrete problems and
proposed solutions."
I definitely agree. I had
sets. Express will have different defaults.
> MDL has different defaults. The Basic set has a particular design goal
> (feature parity with SWF) and thus will have different defaults. There is
> often no one right answer, so we build different component sets and folks
> will try them a
Following on from other discussions, I have made a start on something here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=71013028
In the end this will only work if people want to do it. But I do believe
that one way of getting everyone on the same page here (and we do have
clear
04 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> What's your wiki username?
>
> On 6/26/17, 12:00 AM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >I have been trying to get access to the wiki so I can add a page for PAYG
> >under references and guides.
> >
> >Is this functionality intended
I have been trying to get access to the wiki so I can add a page for PAYG
under references and guides.
Is this functionality intended to be available for committers? I can only
see/select 'Aries' as an option under 'Create'
If not, then I can provide my draft content to someone else who has acces
Thanks Piotr, I think any reliable repro will be difficult, because it just
seems to 'happen' sometimes. I had maven typedefs build working fine for a
long time before this happened. Then it happened for svg.js and also later
for the google maps js.
It does sound like others have experienced this t
Hi Piotr,
"If option a - mean avoid caching svg.js file - It is not a problem I know how
to do this for this file and it can be downloaded for each build."
yes, the idea here was to avoid caching the download in the
maven-download-plugin's own cache. I did not know if there was an option to
do w
un 15, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> That's interesting. But now that you've run Maven again, what version of
> svg.js got cached? The svg.js in my cache does need patching.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/14/17, 4:54 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >I just
e the
> FalconJX RC1 source package, I'm not sure that's ever been tried. That
> could cause the patch to fail as the flex-typedefs folder is nested one
> level. I moved the flex-typedefs folder outside of the FalconJX folder
> and Maven worked for me.
>
> Thanks,
&g
t 11:40 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> A possible clue:
>
> I can see the patched file in :
> C:\Users\Greg\.m2\repository\.cache\maven-download-plugin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
>
>> Alex, fyi if I delete the target directory insid
A possible clue:
I can see the patched file in :
C:\Users\Greg\.m2\repository\.cache\maven-download-plugin
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Alex, fyi if I delete the target directory inside flex-typedefs (to be
> sure it is 'clean', although I am quite sur
Alex, fyi if I delete the target directory inside flex-typedefs (to be sure
it is 'clean', although I am quite sure mvn clean does this also) , then
run mvn clean compile, i get the following in svg.js inside downloads:
/**
* @param {string} type
* @param {!EventListener|(function(!Event): (bool
Piotr, I have been trying to get this to work at various stages also.
fyi inside typedefs/js there is an ant build.xml with a 'make_patch' target
which seems like it is intended to be used for updating the patch, and it
does seem to update it, but then I was hitting other problems after it did,
so
01%7C%7C
> >b863f5cff77e41e305b708d4aebcd62e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C
> >0%7C636325573442866659&sdata=E%2B6iEUFqZB3%2BO15%
> 2BK3sHlnaiuIkWgm8DvWVcmUm
> >nnIk%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >Branch: refs/heads/develop
> >Commit: 08af60c775
I have had a few issues with maven build of typedefs (in develop) over recent
times.
I think others may have experienced this also, at least I have seen similar
things mentioned previously.
For me this seems to be related to patches being applied when the content that
is being downloaded is al
n 2017-06-06 18:55 (+1200), Alex Harui wrote:
> This was first published in 2012.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Alex's+FlexJS+Prototype
>
> PAYG and avoiding just-in-case code is mentioned in that document. As are
> Beads.
>
> Thanks,
> -Al
Harbs, a quick comment from the sidelines on: "PAYG is already well
understood"
I don't really think that is the case, at least it has not been for me. I
had a more general notion of PAYG that was nothing to do with beads at all,
and was limited to guesswork/my own interpretation of it at the begi
Harbs, I think that is only for debug. I don't think they should add bulk
to the release code. At least they do not in the default settings for GCC
optimisation. You will see the definition of the constant only once and
inline replacement is used for the value (with a short name global
variable) ev
Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/1/17, 1:33 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >Just as a quick follow-up (in case anyone else is looking for the same)
> >
> >adding:
> >js
> >to all the swc dependencies in the pom meant I could compile the js-only
> &
:
org.apache.flex.core.HTMLElementWrapper
and similar.
I'm currently trying to figure this out.
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Thanks Alex,
>
> This helps
> JS
> Still some stuff left to figure out, but that is progress. Pretty sure
> that falls into "I
wrote:
> I believe examples/native/ButtonExample only produces JS output.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/1/17, 9:11 AM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >Chris, or perhaps Alex:
> >With the latest changes for maven, I am trying to figure out how to get
> >the
> >sam
Chris, or perhaps Alex:
With the latest changes for maven, I am trying to figure out how to get the
same result with maven as
true
which previously permitted js-only compilation so that COMPILE::JS was not
needed in js-only target project, and it was possible to use, for example,
var style:CSSStyl
try haxe has a great example of this type of thing also, with a lot of
pre-defined examples (but no mxml :) ).
https://try.haxe.org/
It may also be a useful reference for planning for future versions of
whatever we do.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Yes, I'm trying to
I will try to look at it this coming weekend. I have some looming deadlines
with work at the moment that could cause me to end up not having much spare
time :)
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:13 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Any chance that you look into that before 0.8 release?
>
> Thanks,
> Piot
Hi Piotr, you should not be concerned about that. For example, your
bindable VO is also IEventDispatcher but you did not code that. The
compiler did it for you after you marked it [Bindable]. So it could also,
for example, add an interface that indicates the class has compiler
generated toJson supp
ple) so maybe there are flaws in the above
idea and perhaps it is more complicated to have the compiler support it
than I think. But if there is consensus that this type of thing is
worthwhile, I would be happy to try for this as some sort of opt-in
compiler support.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:08
Yes Piotr, although I think we are all guessing what you want, it will be
helpful to be certain.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:03 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Greg,
>
> In order to touch this subject on compiler sight, would it be helpful if I
> prepare what Alex asked me ?
>
> Scenario and generated code
Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/18/17, 11:45 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >maybe fromJson is not the best example :)
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. Are you trying to support
> types in the JSON reviver?
>
> -Alex
>
> >
>
maybe fromJson is not the best example :)
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> I'd be happy to look at compiler side support for this at some point
> during the next month, it is something I have hand-coded many times and I
> think to/from JSON style support would
I'd be happy to look at compiler side support for this at some point during
the next month, it is something I have hand-coded many times and I think
to/from JSON style support would be helpful for VO, especially bindables.
It would need to add an interface I think so you could cast the VO in
serial
Actually I wasn't sure whether the compiler eliminated the dead js code.
But we know that it can.
I get the point about the 'swiss-army-knife' but I don't think that applies
here, because I think this is more a 'standard tool'. I can only directly
recall one Flex project in the last 6 years that d
Just a general question about this type of thing:
Because this is JS-only, does GCC eliminate it as deadcode in a release
version if the method is never used? I would expect that, but I have not
checked that yet... if it does then perhaps the PAYG concern might be moot
(love that word!)
On Sun, A
Mar 29, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/17, 12:12 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >
> >FWIW I tried with remove-circulars again but that broke on 'No GoogDep for
> >console' this time, but I guess you are still working on this.
>
>
r 29, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/17, 12:59 AM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex, if you have time, perhaps you can shed some light on this?
> >
> >I have an mxml component using states, that implements an Interface,
> >I
Harbs, I saw that error a short while ago, but I am not sure it is related
to the native classes.
Dependencies calculated for 'org.apache.flex.states.SetProperty'
org.apache.flex.states.SetProperty depends on org.apache.flex.core.IDocument
was all the appeared immediately before I saw it.
If you
Hi Alex, if you have time, perhaps you can shed some light on this?
I have an mxml component using states, that implements an Interface,
IFormSequence.
the generated CLASS_INFO looks like this:
FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{ name: 'ActionForm', qName:
'components.forms.ActionForm', kind: 'clas
I've just done a sweep through one project fixing our 'borked' stuff, I
guess the latest change might re-'bork' some of the fixes, but I think at
least these changes should be easier to address.
Sometimes I needed to swap a Container to a Group and other times not,
because of the relative/absolute
s not
guaranteed.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/17, 12:00 AM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >I agree that 10 is wrong, but
> >reading both AS and JS doc, I'm now thinking that if the second argument
> >is missing th
I agree that 10 is wrong, but
reading both AS and JS doc, I'm now thinking that if the second argument
is missing that the compiler should use 0.
Please see the note in the comment of this ticket[1]:
We need to decide whether we should add undefined as the second param (it
seems this is the prefer
check the various browsers and permutations this weekend to see what
happens. I already added a ticket for me
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/14/17, 10:42 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Alex Harui wro
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Here's a better link to the old thread. Looks like I did mess around with
> parseInt earlier.
>
> https://s.apache.org/rHq2
>
>
> The goal is to match what AS does and get the performance benefit you
> measured and maybe prevent browsers from
>
> I'm not sure what you are referring to. I don't think the compiler
> currently supplies the second argument. I didn't think it was needed, but
> your tests indicate otherwise, so if that's what you are referring to,
> please file a JIRA so we don't forget to do it.
>
>
>
It seems it does - it
better to not support '0x' strings and make developers check
and specify the 16 radix on the substringsbut it is not consistent with
orignal version
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/14/17, 9:54 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >Alex,
017 at 6:02 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Actually I just checked and it looks like there is a bug in the compiler
> for this
>
>
>
> Greg Dove
> Dove Software Development Ltd
> http://greg-dove.com
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
>
>> Alex, I ag
Actually I just checked and it looks like there is a bug in the compiler
for this
Greg Dove
Dove Software Development Ltd
http://greg-dove.com
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> Alex, I agree, it seems whatever prompted this was elsewhere, but the
> outcome is IMO (a
t, then that
> sounds like a good idea. Please file a JIRA so we don't forget.
>
> But, IMO, we are writing ActionScript and we should not make a practice of
> supplying default parameters. Please figure out why your typedefs aren't
> building and remove the optional para
I think code clarity is one thing, but performance is another - that should
be faster, so I ran a quick check.
I know it can vary across browsers, but
var timeOne = function(){var d=new Date();var b=0; for (var
i=0;i<1000;i++) {b= parseInt(""+(127/255)*1000, 10) / 1000;}
console.log(new Date(
I am seeing this also. It almost feels like it is applying the patch on
download and then trying again (but I have really no idea)
ant build works fine with some warnings about LoggerErrorManager println
but I could not get regular maven build to work
One way I could get the mvn build to work w
Thanks Alex, much appreciated
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK. I'll take care of it.
>
> On 3/7/17, 10:11 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> >Yes, I think they are errors with the tests.
> >
> >iirc it was
> >
> >
>
, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I just realized that these might be legitimate errors. I can fix them if
> you don't have time.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:32 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 3/7/17, 1:04 PM, "Gr
but the errors are related to my changes, but also seems like they found
something valid. I can look into this in a about 5-6 hours time. Do you
need me to revert the commit until I get a chance to address those tests?
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/7
ly in
> my apps. Anything else I should be doing?
>
> > On Mar 6, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > "It sound to me like you know what you’re talking about"
> >
> > Haha, Harbs that's probably more reassuring to me than it should be to
>
I'm going to throw a comment in here from the sidelines
At the end of reading this, you might think it seems like a trivial
suggestion, but here goes anyway:
I understand the logic in striving for a basic set of browser/swf
compatible styles and I agree with the need. But I actually don't thi
)
>
> It sound to me like you know what you’re talking about, so I’m fine with
> whatever you did/want to do… :-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Mar 5, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > OK please brace yourself for an onslaught of text.
> >
> > I t
ed" and that is not what actually happens (not being ignored
is correct, IMO).
And (unless I am missing something important) the rest seems too verbose.
PROPOSED FIX (NOT DONE):
---
This is easy to change please let me know if you agree.
I suggest changing the FlexJS error
update the
geckodriver on the Jenkins build agents (and eventually update Firefox).
Chris
Am 04.03.17, 08:05 schrieb "Greg Dove" :
That was it. Downgrading firefox worked. Thanks!
I saw the browser launch and quick test from ant checkintests,
I did not see it from the maven
ApplicationView or something like that.
>
> And same for the second scenario:
>
>
>
>
>
> Is the equivalent of:
>
>
> var initialView:IApplicationView = new SimpleCSSValuesImpl().
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 3/2/17, 9:09 PM, "Greg
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
