> > I'm not sure what you are referring to. I don't think the compiler > currently supplies the second argument. I didn't think it was needed, but > your tests indicate otherwise, so if that's what you are referring to, > please file a JIRA so we don't forget to do it. > > > It seems it does - it did in that small test I tried and looks like the compiler-jx tests are set up to expect this. But I did not look at the code yet. I will add a JIRA
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail to compile Justin Mclean
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail to compile Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail to comp... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail to ... Justin Mclean
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail to ... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to fail... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Justin Mclean
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Greg Dove
- Re: Typedef issue causing flex-asjs to... Alex Harui