try haxe has a great example of this type of thing also, with a lot of pre-defined examples (but no mxml :) ).
https://try.haxe.org/ It may also be a useful reference for planning for future versions of whatever we do. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I'm trying to say that a simpler starter project could be to display > the generated JS code side by side with the AS/MXML. And it would do > nothing more than that. > > I'm not trying to tell you to do this instead of the CodePen/JSFiddle > project. I'm saying that this simpler project could benefit your > CodePen/JSFiddle project. It has a smaller scope, so you could release > something more quickly. Something that potential FlexJS users would find > useful too! Both projects will integrate with the compiler, though, so a > lot of the code that you'd write for the simpler project could probably be > reused in the more complex project. > > Maybe you'd prefer to jump right into the more complex CodePen/JSFiddle > project, and that's totally fine! Just a suggestion. > > - Josh > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:42 AM, OK <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > > > Josh Tynjala wrote > > > In this simpler project, the generated code wouldn't even be run (maybe > > > that's the part that you missed?) > > > > I think this is the part that I don't understand. Where do you think the > > generated code comes from? > > I thought if it comes from the compiler it always runs? > > > > Or is the idea to just prepare some pre-compiled examples and display the > > MXML/AS3 and HTML/JS side by side? > > > > Sorry, I'm lost ;-) > > > > Thanks, > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-POC-JSFiddle-for- > > FlexJS-Compile-as-a-service-tp61369p61388.html > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
