Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Hi, > I went through the RC. Checked in a bunch of spelling errors in SWC > names, README, RELEASE_NOTES. IMO, it wouldn’t be right to release a > Spell Checker with spelling errors in the supporting documentation ;-). We released 1.0 with similar "issues". You could think of it as data to test

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

I went through the RC. Checked in a bunch of spelling errors in SWC names, README, RELEASE_NOTES. IMO, it wouldn’t be right to release a Spell Checker with spelling errors in the supporting documentation ;-). Everything else (LICENSE, NOTICE, build, RAT) all looks fine so I would likely vote to

Re: [1/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - exclude dictionaries and CONTRIB files

I wanted to catch rogue files accidentally getting in there. On 10/21/14, 8:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >This may be a little simpler and future proof? > > > >Justin

Re: [1/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - exclude dictionaries and CONTRIB files

HI, This may be a little simpler and future proof? Justin

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Hi, > I checked in a SourceForge specific workaround into ant_on_air today, so I > think if we do any sort of release it should be an Installer release. Works for me. > The workaround should allow the Installer to install the original FlexJS > 0.0.2 > package Does it also fix the currently br

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

On 10/21/14, 1:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> So, I think the questions are: >> 1) Is it ok to have the Installer install a different binary package >>than >> the one that was derived from running the build script on the source? > >According the the guideline new and old I say that wou

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

Hi, >> Do we have any Android users that would be willing to test once I have a >> nice working version? Sure I have 1/2 dozen devices I can test it out on. Thanks, Justin

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

On Oct 21, 2014 5:06 PM, "quick6black" wrote: > > I was planning on adding in some missing components and examples, like the > Hslider and geolocation. I also started to cleanup the layouts and merge in > some code from here > < https://github.com/apache/flex-examples/tree/develop/showcase/4.10/l

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

+1 -Successfully built from source -Check License -Check notice -Mark On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES > and the README. > > Changes from the last version: > - Mavenized version of Squigg

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

> That incorrect you should only have one of ApacheFlexSpellingUI.swc or ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc, for spark controls you need ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc. These swcs define the same classes so you can only use one at a time. Ahh good to know! Then i'd adjust my first suggested change to the READ

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Hi, > Per the README I also have ApacheSpellingUI.swc in my src folder. Is that > right? That incorrect you should only have one of ApacheFlexSpellingUI.swc or ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc, for spark controls you need ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc. These swcs define the same classes so you can onl

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Justin, Okay after reviewing your email. I was able to get this to work. I took the ApacheSpellingUI.swc out of the src folder, so I only have ApacheSpellingUIEx.swc in my libs folder. And I've added the ApackeFlexLinguisticUtils.swc into my libs folder. After that everything works great! Prop

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

I was planning on adding in some missing components and examples, like the Hslider and geolocation. I also started to cleanup the layouts and merge in some code from here Do we have any Android users

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Justin, I also have the following in my lib folder: ApacheSpellingEngine.swc ApacheSpellingUIEx.swc Per the README I also have ApacheSpellingUI.swc in my src folder. Is that right? I noted above you mentioned that it was included in the libs folder. Also you said that you have either ApacheSp

RE: Installer Fails to Load

I got that url from the installer log and from Charles Proxy ... Just tried the installer again and now it seems to be working. The url it's using now is the https://www.apache.org/dist/flex/4.13.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer-c onfig.xml Not sure why it was using the other one before. At

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

Hi, > I think we should ship the new version first and work on fixing the Adobe > examples as needed. No need to fix the Adobe version first. That works fine for me. Justin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Hi, > Yep, included that in my libs folder per the README. What other swcs do you have in your lib directory? I think you need a minimum of SpellingEngine.swc, SpellingFramework.swc, LinguisticUtils.swf (?) and SpellingUI.swf or SpellingUIEx.swf depending if you have mx or spark controls. I've

Re: Installer Fails to Load

https://dist.apache.org/flex/4.13.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer-conf ig.xml does not work but: https://www.apache.org/dist/flex/4.13.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer- config.xml does work for me. Where did you see it hit dist.a.o and fail? Sorry the servers are not working for yo

RE: Installer Fails to Load

Yes, that url shows up. The installer will actually let me choose an SDK. For about 30 minutes now. But, when you click 'Next' the installer aborts with: Installer version 3.2.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_CA Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. Unable to load https://www.apache.org/d

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Actually, the Installer is working now! Thanks, Om On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Can you hit the URL from a browser? > > http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml > > > > On 10/21/14, 3:05 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > > >Still broken. Tried it

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Can you hit the URL from a browser? http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml On 10/21/14, 3:05 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Still broken. Tried it just now. > >On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> I asked Apache Infra and they said there was a se

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Still broken. Tried it just now. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I asked Apache Infra and they said there was a server issue but they think > it is resolved. Can you try again? > > On 10/21/14, 2:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >MD5Checker just passed. Looks like server r

Re: Installer Fails to Load

I asked Apache Infra and they said there was a server issue but they think it is resolved. Can you try again? On 10/21/14, 2:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >MD5Checker just passed. Looks like server response is slowly creeping >back towards normal. Hopefully it will reach you soon. > >On 10/21/14

RE: Installer Fails to Load

That's pretty much exactly what I was seeing from Charles. Although I'm no longer getting that. I'm now getting this in the installer log when clicking the 'Next' button on the SDK selection screen. Version 3.1.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_CA Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. AIR v

Re: Installer Fails to Load

When I run the Installer, here is what the request's response looks like (From Fiddler) Request: http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml Response: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:28:45 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Content-Length: 531 Connect

Re: Installer Fails to Load

MD5Checker just passed. Looks like server response is slowly creeping back towards normal. Hopefully it will reach you soon. On 10/21/14, 2:13 PM, "Neil Madsen" wrote: >Just checked the installer badge here [1] and I see this [2] > >I can see the flex website but the badge installer won't work

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Failed. I just did build on my local PC and was successful. Alex Let's get back to your previous settings on build.properties to see what will happen. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-

RE: Installer Fails to Load

Just checked the installer badge here [1] and I see this [2] I can see the flex website but the badge installer won't work either. It appears to be failing with the same issue. [1] http://flex.apache.org/installer.html [2] http://snag.gy/Y7Gdy.jpg Neil -Original Message- From: Alex Haru

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

I just started another build just to see what happens... On 10/21/14, 2:03 PM, "piotrz" wrote: >Nope I didn't write them. I will look maybe in the reports what has >happened. >Your changes shouldn't impact on the tests. > >Piotr > > > >- >Apache Flex PMC >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >-- >View

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Nope I didn't write them. I will look maybe in the reports what has happened. Your changes shouldn't impact on the tests. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Build-failed-in-Jenkins-flex

Re: Installer Fails to Load

I tried it and it is broken as well. I am looking at the google stats page. First of all, there are 57 successful installs: /track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0&version=4.13.0&os=windows Here are the stats on the errors from today (almost real time) 16 errors: /track-installer.htm

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Yes I saw. Did you write those tests? Hopefully you can dig in and find out why they failed. It could be some timing thing. On 10/21/14, 1:45 PM, "piotrz" wrote: >Hmm..It's strange why the next build failed ? :) You have changed only >some >memory settings, and some tests failed. > >Piotr > >

Re: Installer Fails to Load

http://status.apache.org shows no known issues. It never failed for me today. I think there are at least two HTTP servers at Apache, at least one in the US, one in Europe. I’m on the west coast, Harbs is on the east coast, not sure where Justin is today. Maybe one of the servers burped. -Alex

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Hmm..It's strange why the next build failed ? :) You have changed only some memory settings, and some tests failed. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Build-failed-in-Jenkins-flex-tlf-15

RE: Installer Fails to Load

That could be a good thing in that people are trying to download and a bad thing in that the server can't handle the load :\ I'm still getting 500 Errors. I've tried direct download from all browsers (on windows) and from the installer (release & compiled from source). Is there a way to find out

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-examples/tree/develop/tourdeflexmobile > was > > built from scratch and donated by George Yabra. > > Yep I pointed that out as well (FLEX-33839) :-) Adding the Adobe donated > examples to it would mak

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

Hi, > https://github.com/apache/flex-examples/tree/develop/tourdeflexmobile was > built from scratch and donated by George Yabra. Yep I pointed that out as well (FLEX-33839) :-) Adding the Adobe donated examples to it would make it even better. Thanks, Justin

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Hi, > So, I think the questions are: > 1) Is it ok to have the Installer install a different binary package than > the one that was derived from running the build script on the source? According the the guideline new and old I say that would be a no, but given it easily corrected by a small modi

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Why is that? We should not tied to the code that Adobe donated. > > No we're not tried to it, but I'm not sure we could accept a modified > branch based off the un donated Adobe code as it would contain examples and > assets that

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Interesting. MD5Checker failed to get the file and it is using Ant. It really could be the Apache server this time. Maybe so many people are hitting the server after Om’s talk that it can’t keep up. -Alex On 10/21/14, 1:21 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Now all three browsers are returning the file. >

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Now all three browsers are returning the file. On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Harbs wrote: > Weird. Chrome returns the file, but Safari and Firefox returns a 500 error. > > On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Harbs wrote: > >> I’m getting a 500 error trying to load the file in my web browser… >> >>

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Weird. Chrome returns the file, but Safari and Firefox returns a 500 error. On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Harbs wrote: > I’m getting a 500 error trying to load the file in my web browser… > > On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Works for me. This is a common problem in AIR.

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

HI, > With Justin being the lone dissenter Erik can you please refrain from categorising the discussion is this way, it's unhelpful and disingenuous. I actually don't think that Alex or Om disagrees with me where the issues are here and we are trying to sort out what is the best and correct co

Re: Installer Fails to Load

I’m getting a 500 error trying to load the file in my web browser… On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Works for me. This is a common problem in AIR. I don’t know why it gets > stuck like that. > > Try hitting that link from a browser, clearing browser caches, rebooting, > etc.

RE: Installer Fails to Load

Just looked at the response in Charles and it says there is a 500 server response coming back. Like I said, I've tried both compiled source and the release installer. Same results. Any way we can kick the server a bit? Neil -Original Message- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

Hi, > Why is that? We should not tied to the code that Adobe donated. No we're not tried to it, but I'm not sure we could accept a modified branch based off the un donated Adobe code as it would contain examples and assets that were removed by Adobe before donating it. Basically we don't have

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Someone just showed me an error message in the Installer log that said 'Internet connection not available', even though the connection is available. Thanks, Om On Oct 21, 2014 1:07 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Works for me. This is a common problem in AIR. I don’t know why it gets > stuck like th

Re: Installer Fails to Load

JFYI I'm also getting the same error.

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

On Oct 21, 2014 1:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > would it make sense to make an Android one with the new skins and publish > > that in the play store? > > Yes - see: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33839 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34487 > > > I have a fo

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

Hi, > would it make sense to make an Android one with the new skins and publish > that in the play store? Yes - see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33839 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34487 > I have a fork of that project that I made some > changes too. I could update an

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

On Oct 21, 2014 10:13 AM, "quick6black" wrote: > > would it make sense to make an Android one with the new skins and publish > that in the play store? I have a fork of that project that I made some > changes too. I could update and publish in the play store Big +1. It would be great to have this

Re: Installer Fails to Load

Works for me. This is a common problem in AIR. I don’t know why it gets stuck like that. Try hitting that link from a browser, clearing browser caches, rebooting, etc. -Alex On 10/21/14, 12:58 PM, "Neil Madsen" wrote: >Getting this error in the log when the installer starts up. This happens

Re: Installer Fails to Load

It looks like the server is returning a 500 error. On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:58 PM, Neil Madsen wrote: > Getting this error in the log when the installer starts up. This happens in > the installed version and when I compile from source. > > Version 3.1.0 (windows) > Unable to load http://flex.apac

Re: Problem in TourDeFlex

Hi, > I just wanted to show a colleague the TourDeFlex application and we clicked > on the "Show Callout" Button in the Flex 4.12 section ... I am pretty sure > there shouldn't be a Flashplayer Error callout ;-) It's a know issue and is noted in the release notes. I'm not sure what the fix it,

Installer Fails to Load

Getting this error in the log when the installer starts up. This happens in the installed version and when I compile from source. Version 3.1.0 (windows) Unable to load http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml Error while trying to load XML configuration file: 2032 Installati

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Good job getting it working, and seeing the fork problem. I’m going to revert my last change to build.properties as the internet say it slows things down. -Alex On 10/21/14, 11:56 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Finally build is working! :) Thanks Alex for helping me on that! > > > >- >Apache Flex PM

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Finally build is working! :) Thanks Alex for helping me on that! - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Build-failed-in-Jenkins-flex-tlf-155-tp41547p41614.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Definitely worth a try. I just checked in more -XX JVM args to see if that will help. -Alex On 10/21/14, 11:11 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Thanks Erik! > >Alex I am seeing in build.xml this -> compc fork="${forkValue}" - I think >we >do not have this variable anywhere or am I wrong ? >Maybe we should

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Thanks Erik! Alex I am seeing in build.xml this -> compc fork="${forkValue}" - I think we do not have this variable anywhere or am I wrong ? Maybe we should try to set up it to true ? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-de

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Justin, >As per the README I think you need to add ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc for it to work with spark >components. Yep, included that in my libs folder per the README. Chris On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > After including the ApacheFlexSpellingFramework.s

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

On 10/21/14, 10:25 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >Thanks for the summary. > >> IMO, the answer to all four is yes > >I agree. > >BTW, What are we using JBurg for and why is it needed to install FlexJS? >(I have not yet put in the mental energy to completely “get” how FlexJS >is working…) Good question. A

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Thanks for the summary. > IMO, the answer to all four is yes I agree. BTW, What are we using JBurg for and why is it needed to install FlexJS? (I have not yet put in the mental energy to completely “get” how FlexJS is working…) On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 10/2

Re: Tour de Flex Mobile

would it make sense to make an Android one with the new skins and publish that in the play store? I have a fork of that project that I made some changes too. I could update and publish in the play store -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Tour-d

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

On 10/21/14, 6:35 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I’m happy to wait for incubator resolution. (Does that give Om enough >time for his presentation?) I don’t think we need to wait for a resolution in the sense that they are going to vote on whether we can modify the binary package or not or someone will giv

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

For what it’s worth, I think it’s perfectly OK to point to the nightlies, especially with the disclaimer. Good luck with your talk! EdB On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:50 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Just woke up to check this thread. I have exactly 4 hours before the talk > starts. > > At th

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Just woke up to check this thread. I have exactly 4 hours before the talk starts. At this point, I am inclined to point the conference attendees towards nightly builds with a strong warning that they are not official releases. Thanks to everyone for trying to resolve this issue before the talk.

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

I’m happy to wait for incubator resolution. (Does that give Om enough time for his presentation?) I’m actually trying to understand the issues involved here. Harbs On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > This type of thread was discussed on private@ recently. As all participants >

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

This type of thread was discussed on private@ recently. As all participants are PMC members, I remind you of the resolution of that discussion. With Justin being the lone dissenter, but with a reasonable suggestion from him on the table - wait for an incubator resolution - I move we put this threa

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

On Oct 21, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > No where (that I can find) does it state that the binary release can be > altered or changed without a vote. I don’t get this line. The vote is not on the binary. It’s on the source. It goes to reason that the binary does not even need to be

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

I read the page twice, and I had to use search to even find the text you reference. Okay. So if I understand you, the issue here is the LICENSE/NOTICE text. I have not been following this well enough to understand exactly why it needs to change. Again, I’m not following 100% (so please forgive

RE: Download Analytics (was Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%))

Thanks Alex. -Mark -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:58 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Download Analytics (was Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)) Sorry, hit some key that resulted in a “send”. The ans

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Hi, > That’s not how I read it… With all due respect please read the official Apache release policies. [1] In particular under "what is a release" it states: "the binary/bytecode package must ... (be) the result of compiling that version of the source code release." Under "What must every rel

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:43 AM, piotrz wrote: > Alex it is still failing... :/ Another thing that my company email address > is > on the list "Sending e-mails to:" after the build. How to remove it from > there ? > The builds machine takes the email address that was used to commit to the Git r

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #155

Alex it is still failing... :/ Another thing that my company email address is on the list "Sending e-mails to:" after the build. How to remove it from there ? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabbl

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

That’s not how I read it… If the binary has third party dependencies changing those dependencies do not seem to need a vote. What source code needs to be changed to fix this installer? Your statement also cannot be true. Binaries are not official releases (as has been made very clear), but bin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Hi, > Having said that, the consensus within the PMC was to first do a few rounds > of QA without calling a vote for each build. That's the whole point of CTR (commit then review). > Justin didn’t agree and as Release Manager, he is free to handle a release > as he sees fit, however. It not tha

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Hi, > Both Branko and Roman said that binaries do not need votes. That may be correct, but binaries must be produced from official source releases and only official releases can be distributed on apache dist. There is one very large open question which is can an officially released installer i

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

There has to be at least one vote in order for something to become a release. Having said that, the consensus within the PMC was to first do a few rounds of QA without calling a vote for each build. That way, if a few people ironed out the wrinkles first, likely only one round of voting would be n

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

Hi, > I thought we were going to skip votes for release candidates ? You need to vote on a RC in order to make it a official release, there's no way that Apache policy (for good reasons). Plus I can't see this release having a large number of RCs unless there's something obvious I'm missing as

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Both Branko and Roman said that binaries do not need votes. Ted was just making a suggestion to avoid the issue (which can work as well). The Apache stance seems to be that “installers” are not official unless they are installing source. On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

I like it how two Apache resources (general@ and incubator@) appear to be giving contradicting advise … not! If there isn’t even a clear consensus within the parent organisation, we should do what is best for the users of our project and let the powers that be figure out what the official party li

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

I thought we were going to skip votes for release candidates ? Tom On 20/10/14 04:00, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Please place any discussion here and not in the vote thread. Thanks, Justin __ This email has been scanned by the

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

HI, > The responses there seemed pretty clear to me that changing binary packages > is okay without a vote because they are not official releases. Am I missing > something? IMO several things but we wait to see what people say on incubator. The advice on incubator so far was to have a vote or

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

The responses there seemed pretty clear to me that changing binary packages is okay without a vote because they are not official releases. Am I missing something? On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > I did ask on general@incubator. I think folks who participated in the > discussi

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

Hi, >I think you can. Just label it according to what it is. >You can even link from the web site. I believe that statement was referring to creating your own installer and not using the official installer, see Ted previous email which states you could add to the web site this - "Here

Re: Very high FlexJS installer error rate (98+%)

I did ask on general@incubator. I think folks who participated in the discussion have shut down for the evening, but one of the last responses was encouraging: On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >So I am looking for reasons why we can/can’t >update a binary package

Problem in TourDeFlex

?Hi Guys, I just wanted to show a colleague the TourDeFlex application and we clicked on the "Show Callout" Button in the Flex 4.12 section ... I am pretty sure there shouldn't be a Flashplayer Error callout ;-) Chris