Well, I've tried everything I can think of and no luck. I'm done for
today. If someone else wants to take a shot at it, please do so.
-Alex
On 5/1/14 1:27 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Feel free to log in and apply this fix. I will have some time later in
>the
>day if needed.
>
>Thanks,
On 5/1/14 10:06 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> Downloading Apache FlexJS
>>from:http://apache.claz.org/flex/flexjs/0.0.1/binaries/apache-flex-flexjs
>>-0.0.1-bin.zip
>
>apache.claz.org?
I assume that's a mirror.
>
>> Installing Apache Flex SDK from:
>>http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/4.
HI,
> Downloading Apache FlexJS
> from:http://apache.claz.org/flex/flexjs/0.0.1/binaries/apache-flex-flexjs-0.0.1-bin.zip
apache.claz.org?
> Installing Apache Flex SDK from:
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/4.12.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.12.0-bin.zip
> Installing Apache Flex Falcon Com
Here you are:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+4.12.1+Release+Notes
Feel free to make additions/changes.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:15
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache
Feel free to log in and apply this fix. I will have some time later in the
day if needed.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Here's a link:
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+CLI#JenkinsCLI-Connecti
> onmechanism
>
> I think the firewall needs f
Here's a link:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+CLI#JenkinsCLI-Connecti
onmechanism
I think the firewall needs fixing. I think the rule I tried to set up
isn't right. Other articles I found online imply there's an Exceptions
tab I was supposed to use instead.
-Alex
On 5/1/1
No idea why it chose 49169. I think I saw an article that the port it
uses is supposed to be different from the public port for the UI (8080).
I'm trying to find that article again and read it more carefully.
I set up Jenkins to try to listen on that port (see Global Security). But
it didn't help
The slave is trying to connect to Jenkins on port 49169. Any idea where
this came from? I see that Jenkins is still running on 8080.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Okay, I am in now.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Erik de Brui
Okay, I am in now.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Lol, oops... I forgot to ask permission ;-)
>
> I looked, but whomever was logged in was thinking the same way I was, so no
> insights from me.
>
> Out again.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:28 PM,
Not me. Must be Erik.
Or your VM got owned ;-)
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Someone just logged in. Whoever it was feel free to figure it out. I'm
> at a loss. I tried setting a firewall rule in case that was the problem,
> but it didn't help.
>
> I also
Lol, oops... I forgot to ask permission ;-)
I looked, but whomever was logged in was thinking the same way I was, so no
insights from me.
Out again.
EdB
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:28 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Om, Erik,
> >
> > E
Someone just logged in. Whoever it was feel free to figure it out. I'm
at a loss. I tried setting a firewall rule in case that was the problem,
but it didn't help.
I also tried setting a specific port in the Jenkins Global Security
settings.
-Alex
On 5/1/14 12:28 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wr
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Om, Erik,
>
> Earlier today I allowed the ci server to reboot and take some windows
> updates. Since then I cannot get the slave to connect. Any ideas?
>
>
I can take a look. Let me know when it is okay for me to remote into the
machine.
Th
Om, Erik,
Earlier today I allowed the ci server to reboot and take some windows
updates. Since then I cannot get the slave to connect. Any ideas?
-Alex
Perhaps revert from SVN history? Let me know if I can help somehow.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> When I pushed 4.12.1 I accidentally removed 4.12.0. I'm trying to restore
> 4.12.0 from archives (at least, the binary folder) so the installer
> doesn't barf.
When I pushed 4.12.1 I accidentally removed 4.12.0. I'm trying to restore
4.12.0 from archives (at least, the binary folder) so the installer
doesn't barf.
On 5/1/14 11:45 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>What's happening? Will this affect the mirrors?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>On Thu, May 1, 2014
What's happening? Will this affect the mirrors?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote:
> Author: aharui
> Date: Thu May 1 18:38:22 2014
> New Revision: 5219
>
> Log:
> Oops! Shouldn't have axed 4.12.0 just yet.
>
> Added:
> release/flex/4.12.0/
> release/flex/4.12.0/binar
Oh ... so I'll update that to 4.7 in the poms then.
The problem with BlazeDS was that you actually never found the page where to
download stuff from. I never got past 4.0.1, cause I never found the Download
for anything more recent :-(
Think in that case I'll have to completely get to know Blaz
Gee ... these numbers would have been great in my ApacheCon presentation ;-)
But impressive numbers they are ... we should somewhere keep track of posts
like this on our Wiki ... cause I think it would make convincing potential new
customers a lot easier :-)
Thanks for sharing that link :-)
Chr
+1 (binding)
Sigs ok
Rat ok
Build ok
Installed correctly on Mac and Win 7
On 3/15/14 12:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> One followup question: Do we know for sure that Installer 2.7 fixed up
>> the RSL versions? I am not seeing a
Vote passed with 3 binding +1 votes (Om, Erik, Alex) and 2 0 votes (one
of which was -1 but changed to 0 in the discuss thread)
There was also a +1 non-binding vote from Piotr.
Thanks everyone for voting.
-Alex
On 3/15/14 12:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:43 AM
When do you intend to make the announcement on 4.12.1, so you I can have the
wiki page ready ?
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 17:35
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
On 4/30/14 1:41
Actually the announcement won't go out for another 24 hours so the mirrors
can pick up the new bits.
On 5/1/14 9:10 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>No, it won't. So go ahead
>
>De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:08
>À : dev@f
No, it won't. So go ahead
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
Working on it now. If your wiki page isn't ready right away I don't think
it will ma
Working on it now. If your wiki page isn't ready right away I don't think
it will matter that much.
On 5/1/14 9:06 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>When do you intend to make the announcement on 4.12.1, so you I can have
>the wiki page ready ?
>
>De : Alex
Vote passed with 4 +1 votes, no 0 votes and no -1 votes.
Thanks to those who voted.
-Alex
On 5/1/14 8:36 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>Windows 7 FP 11 AIR 3.4 mustella run passes.
>Sigs ok
>Build ok
>Notice files ok
>Rat ok
>
>-Alex
>
>On 4/29/14 1:44 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>wrote:
+1 (binding)
Windows 7 FP 11 AIR 3.4 mustella run passes.
Sigs ok
Build ok
Notice files ok
Rat ok
-Alex
On 4/29/14 1:44 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>+1 (Binding)
>
>Win7 64 - FR - Java 1.6
>
>Checked MD5 => OK
>
>Manual build of SDK from source => OK ( rsls are ok)
>
>Tested SDK in FB 4.7 o
On 4/30/14 1:41 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>(copied from wrong VOTE thread):
>
>One minor issue in the release notes:
>FLEX-33948 Add touch behaviour to spark DropDownList classes => the
>ticket is still open. implementation attempts were not satisfactory, and
>have not been committed.
I a
Oups, thanks, done !!
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:35:35 +
>
> Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file should
> probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now.
Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file should
probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now.
-Alex
On 5/1/14 6:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to have a look
>before I merge it in Develop, th
Alex,
I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to have a look before
I merge it in Develop, that's won't be now but still.
This is the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34294 if you want
to check the code via the "Source" tab instead in few minutes.
Thanks for you
31 matches
Mail list logo
