+1 (binding) Sigs ok Rat ok Build ok Installed correctly on Mac and Win 7
On 3/15/14 12:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> One followup question: Do we know for sure that Installer 2.7 fixed up >> the RSL versions? I am not seeing any code that does that. Could I >>have >> deleted it by accident? >> >> >Only for osmf, that too only after we started supporting OSMF 2.0. There >is a method called getFlexVersionBuildString() that reads the >flex-sdk-description.xml and returns the version and build number. This >gets appended to the osmf.swf file name. > >Thanks, >Om > > > >> I'll try it myself tomorrow. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 3/15/14 12:36 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >On 3/14/14 11:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >> > >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>> I'm not sure what "Latest SDK" means. Is that the nightly? Did you >> >>> install it into Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit? >> >>Latest develop branch. >> >Sorry, I'm still confused. If it is the latest develop branch, how is >>the >> >installer involved? >> > >> >> >> >>> What were you running when you got this error? Ant on some >>build.xml? >> >>> Which one? >> >>ant in the air_for_ant directory. >> >I was about to guess that. The README for the installer says you have >>to >> >specify AIR_HOME when building ant_on_air, was it set to some older >> >version of AIR SDK? It won't pick the AIR SDK out of the SDK specified >>by >> >FLEX_HOME. So if you specify AIR_HOME as an AIR 4.0 SDK and then the >> >build works then this is not an installer issue. >> > >> >However, I did notice the README is not quite correct. The ant_on_air >> >build does not use FLEX_HOME_WIN and FLEX_HOME_MAC, the installer build >> >does. I will fix the README. It looks like the README is not in the >> >source package. Did we fix a README issue for the SDK or Installer >>once >> >without doing another RC or is another RC required? >> > >> >> >> >>> Crap. I guess I did not understand how this part of the install was >> >>> supposed to work. This is a bug in the install script for 4.12, not >> >>>the >> >>> installer. >> >>This only happens when you use the new installer - so that basically >> >>means we can release the new installer until we fix the config file >>and >> >>release 4.12.1. >> >> >> >>There should be a way to make them independent of each other and avoid >> >>this - any ideas? >> >They are independent. Other than downloading the binary package, >> >verifying the MD5, and uncompressing, the rest of the install >> >responsibilities are in the package, not the installer. I suspect if >>you >> >actually use Ant to run the installer.xml you'll have the same >>problem. I >> >know the temptation is to change the installer, but if we ever get the >> >installer out there, we'll be glad in the future that (hopefully) any >> >other SDK or FlexJS install issue can be fixed in the SDK and FlexJS >> >installer.xmls so we only vote on one package and not try to coordinate >> >two votes and two packages in the future. >> > >> >> >> >>>> -Issue with 4.11 RSL in flex-config.xml >> >>> More details please? >> >>As discussed before that are incorrect and have 0 as the build number. >> >Rats, looks like I missed that before. I'll have a look in my morning. >> > >> >Thanks, >> >-Alex >> > >> >>
