Minutes of tech-board meeting: 2022-01-26

2022-02-01 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Tech Board Attendees: Bruce, Aaron, Ferruh, Jerin, Maxime, Thomas, Kevin, Konstantin, Olivier, Stephen, Honnappa, Hemant Agenda Items -- * Tech writer * No updates on this * Getting new program manager from LF - may need to remind on hiring Tech writer. * UNH Statement

RE: [PATCH v14 04/11] app/test: skip interrupt tests on Windows

2021-12-09 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Richardson > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 4:17 PM > To: Aaron Conole > Cc: Jerin Jacob ; Jie Zhou > ; dpdk-dev ; Dmitry Kozlyuk > ; roret...@microsoft.com; Narcisa Ana Maria > Vasile ; Dmitry Malloy (MESHCHANINOV) > ; Kadam, Pallavi ; > tal...@nvid

[dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2021-01-27

2021-01-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
NOTE: The Technical Board meetings take place every second Wednesday on https://meet.jit.si/DPDK at 3 pm UTC. Meetings are public, and DPDK community members are welcome to attend. Agenda and minutes can be found at http://core.dpdk.org/techboard/minutes NOTE: Next meeting will be on Wednesday 202

Minutes of Technical Board meeting 2024-05-15

2024-05-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Next meeting will be 29th May, with Hemant as Chair Attendees - Stephen Hemminger Bruce Richardson Aaron Conole Konstantin Ananyev Kevin Traynor Hemant Agrawal Jerin Jacob Maxime Coquelin Honnappa Nagarahalli Thomas Monjalon David Marchand Nathan Southern Tyler Retzlaff Robin Jarry Minute

Minutes of Technical Board Meeting 2023-06-14

2023-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Attendees -- * Aaron * Bruce * Hemant * Honnappa * Jerin * Kevin * Maxime * Thomas * Morten * Tyler * Nathan * Akhil * David M. * Dave Y. NOTES: * Next meeting on 2023-06-28 will be chaired by Hemant General Updates Documentation Rework ~ * Dave You

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] Link Bonding PMD Library (librte_eal/librte_ether link bonding support changes)

2014-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- <...snip...> > > this doesn't seem like an idea solution either. I'm not 100% clear why > > rte_eal_pci_probe is currently called by the application code and not > > initiated > > from within rte_eal_dev_init, if this was the case we would be able to > > figure >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] Link Bonding PMD Library (librte_eal/librte_ether link bonding support changes)

2014-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:48 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Doherty, Declan; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] Link Bonding PMD Library > (librte_eal/librte_ether

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Hi all, Now that vfio support has merged into the dpdk.org mainline, I'm seeing a number of issues with running applications, and I'm hoping someone can explain the observed behaviour. I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday and are bound correctly to the igb_uio dr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: make container open error non-fatal

2014-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
The below patch is the quickest fix I found to make my applications work again, but I'm not sure it's the best solution. Can anyone else offer other suggestions to improve this? > -Original Message- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:29 PM &g

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:40 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: vfio detection > > Hi Bruce, > > > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday and are >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: make container open error non-fatal

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:52 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] vfio: make container open error non-fatal > > Hi Bruce, > > > The below patch is the quickest fix I foun

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Yes, so I see. Resending with log in body. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:36 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > Bruce,

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:29 AM > To: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > > -Original Message- > > F

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: open VFIO container at startup rather than during init

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 2:12 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Richardson, Bruce > Subject: [PATCH] vfio: open VFIO container at startup rather than during init > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > ---

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: make container open error non-fatal

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:29 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Richardson, Bruce > Subject: [PATCH] vfio: make container open error non-fatal > > When setting up an app to run using the uio driver, errors caused b

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:42 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:38:38PM

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: correct system call error checking

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:04 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: correct system call error checking > > Noticed today that ioctl error code return checking was incorr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: correct system call error checking

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:40 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: correct system call error checking > > On Tue, Jun 17,

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:01 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: vfio detection > > Hi Bruce, > > > > > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday &g

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO

2014-06-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:07 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; nhorman at tuxdriver.com > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO > > This patchset fixes an issue with VFIO where DPDK ini

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] EAL: fix usage of printf-like functions

2014-06-21 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 4:58 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] EAL: fix usage of printf-like functions > > On Sat, 21

[dpdk-dev] PCIid 0x0436

2014-06-23 Thread Richardson, Bruce
I've checked the Intel Communications Chipset 89xx Series (Cave Creek) datasheet [http://www.intel.ie/content/www/ie/en/intelligent-systems/crystal-forest-server/intel-communications-chipset-89xx-series-datasheet.html], and 0x0436 is indeed one of the possible PCI IDs used by that product. Howe

[dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all?

2014-06-23 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:16 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all? > > Why does rte_snprintf exist? It seems like a misunderstanding or broken > impleme

[dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all?

2014-06-23 Thread Richardson, Bruce
m: Wiles, Roger Keith [mailto:keith.wi...@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:31 PM To: Rogers, Gerald Cc: Richardson, Bruce; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all? Why not just convert it into a macro and ifdef out the code or remove it. This

[dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all?

2014-06-23 Thread Richardson, Bruce
user has been given sufficient warning. Regards, /Bruce From: Wiles, Roger Keith [mailto:keith.wi...@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:46 PM To: Richardson, Bruce Cc: Rogers, Gerald; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all? Bruce, Will the depre

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mk: overriding CC also overrides HOSTCC

2014-06-24 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:39 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mk: overriding CC also overrides HOSTCC > > Hi Bruce, >

[dpdk-dev] eal_parse_coremask fails on SIGILL

2014-06-24 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Helmut Sim > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:08 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] eal_parse_coremask fails on SIGILL > > one more detail, i am using dpdk-1.6.0r1 > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf

2014-06-24 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:03 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf > > The function rte_snprintf serves no useful purpose. It is the >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: don't leak ring on failure

2014-06-24 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:16 AM > To: Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: don't leak ring on failure > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > If mempool can

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf

2014-06-24 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:54 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf > > On Tue, 24

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt TX function to API

2014-06-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:07 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt > TX function t

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt TX function to API

2014-06-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:06 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt > TX function t

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] previous patches about "shared code"/"base drivers"

2014-06-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 5:22 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] previous patches about "shared code"/"base > drivers" > > There were discussions about how to fix/

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] EAL support for link bonding device initialization

2014-06-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:01 AM > To: Doherty, Declan > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] EAL support for link bonding device > initialization > > 2014-06-25 1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mk: overriding CC also overrides HOSTCC

2014-06-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:22 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mk: overriding CC also overrides HOSTCC > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf

2014-06-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 1:33 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] skeleton app: Very simple code for l2fwding

2014-06-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:57 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] skeleton app: Very simple code for l2fwding > > > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BAREMETAL > >>+#define MAIN _

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf

2014-06-27 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 5:34 AM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf > > Hi Pablo, > > On 06/27/2014 02:1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf

2014-06-30 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 12:42 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf > > Hello

[dpdk-dev] Memory Pinning.

2014-06-30 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Markuze > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:01 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Memory Pinning. > > Hi, Guys. > I have several newbie questions about the DPDK design I was hoping some one > could

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] device-args: replace use-device eal option by pci-whitelist and vdev

2014-03-03 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 5:26 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] device-args: replace use-device eal > option by pci-whitelist and vdev > > This commit splits the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] device-args: replace use-device eal option by pci-whitelist and vdev

2014-03-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> > My initial concern was that --use-device has 2 different significations, > depending on the format of arguments: >- instanciate a virtual driver if it looks like a vdev name >- add a PCI device to the whitelist if it looks like a pci address I also > find > strange that instanciating

[dpdk-dev] Very low performance with l2fwd in a VM with PCI Passthrough

2014-03-07 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> My setup details are > > - Traffic coming in on a 10G interface(eth0) and going out on another 10G > interface(eth1) > - Both 10G NICs are 82599 > - Created virtual functions eth5 and eth8 on eth0 and eth1 respectively > - eth5 and eth8 are mapped to eth0 and eth1 in a VM, with device type as >

[dpdk-dev] Packet crafting....

2014-03-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> Hello friends, > > As of now... I know on how to create an ipv4 header using the 'struct > ipv4_hdr'. > My requirement is to craft a packet and sent it via 'rte_eth_tx_burst'. > I know that there should be an 'ether_hdr' created before, the packet could > be sent. > Could someone help me on how

[dpdk-dev] Packet crafting....

2014-03-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> From: sabu kurian [mailto:sabu2kurian at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 10:09 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet crafting > > Thank you very much Richardson for your valuable reply. But is there another > w

[dpdk-dev] Packet crafting....

2014-03-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> From: sabu kurian [mailto:sabu2kurian at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 11:38 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet crafting > > Thanks on the reply Richardson. You did mention something like "Don't

[dpdk-dev] Error : dereferencing pointer to incomplete type......

2014-03-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Maybe check that you have included the header files with the correct structure definitions. > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sabu kurian > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 8:28 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Error : dereferenci

[dpdk-dev] Using flow director to distrbute vlan traffic

2014-03-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Viswanath Alikonda > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:55 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Using flow director to distrbute vlan traffic > > Hi, > > I am using DPDK 1.4 and trying to distribute tra

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] 10G PMD: enable vector PMD compile for 64b linux

2014-05-12 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Please ignore, my patch seems to have got corrupted with some other WIP content that will be upstreamed in a future patch set. /Bruce > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 10:23 AM > To: dev at dpdk.or

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 1.7.0-rc0

2014-05-12 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:32 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 1.7.0-rc0 > > Start development cycle for version 1.7.0. > > This new development workflow intro

[dpdk-dev] RSS for double vlan tagged packets

2014-05-13 Thread Richardson, Bruce
I don't think the hardware supports using RSS on packets with a double VLAN tag. Regards, /Bruce > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Surya Nimmagadda > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:17 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RSS for

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make install

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:34 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make > install > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make install

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:56 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make > install > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make install

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> > It seems reasonable. > So you plan to send a v2 with this algorithm? > I haven't started investigating such a solution just yet, but I'll see what I can come up with and I'll let you know.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] config: factorize configurations

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 3:58 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] config: factorize configurations > > linux and bsd default configurations now have their own default

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] config: rename "default" configuration file as "native"

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 3:58 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] config: rename "default" configuration file as > "native" > > The "default" part in configuration fi

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] config: rename "default" machine type as "core2"

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 3:58 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] config: rename "default" machine type as > "core2" > > "default" machine type refers to core2 -march

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:20 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions > > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf can'

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Spelling fixes

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:18 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Spelling fixes > > Fix spelling errors found by codespell > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield

2014-05-19 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 8:27 AM > To: Shaw, Jeffrey B; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in > a bitfield > > Hi Jeff, > > On 05/09/

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield

2014-05-19 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:31 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; Shaw, Jeffrey B; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in > a bitfield >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] ring: provide rte_ring_as_ethdev API

2014-05-19 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 7:54 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] ring: provide rte_ring_as_ethdev API > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor

2014-05-20 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:39 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor > > > > This sounds an awful

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor

2014-05-20 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:14 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor > > Ah, my bad, I was lookin

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] distributor: new packet distributor library

2014-05-21 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 7:19 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] distributor: new packet distributor > library > > On Tue, May 2

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor

2014-05-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:33 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor > > Hi Bruce, > &g

[dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK

2014-05-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sabu kurian > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:42 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK > > I have asked a similar question before, no one replied though. > > I'm cra

[dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK

2014-05-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> From: sabu kurian [mailto:sabu2kurian at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:54 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK > > Hai bruce, > Thanks for the reply. > I even tried that before

[dpdk-dev] Question: Can't make pcap and refcnt to match

2013-12-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> > Hi Bruce, > > I made a dead simple patch that seems to fix my problem. Could you check > and see whether I'm on the right track here? > > The patch is as follows: > > -- >8 -- [BR] Hi. Just so you know, a fix for this will be present in the Intel DPDK 1.5.2 patch release from Intel, which

[dpdk-dev] glibc 2.1

2013-11-22 Thread Richardson, Bruce
The Intel DPDK should work fine on RHEL 6.4. There should be no need to update your glibc, since this is subversion 12 (> 7), rather than 1.2. Regards, /Bruce > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Michael Quicquaro > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2

[dpdk-dev] rte_ring_sc_dequeue returns 0 but sets packet to NULL

2013-11-22 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> IMHO, adding NULL objects is likely an error not a legitimate use case for > adding ring elements. > > Can anyone think of a use case where adding NULL pointer objects makes > sense? > [BR] As well as the use case already mentioned of passing using NULLs, there is also the scenario where we wa

[dpdk-dev] Query regarding multiple processes in DPDK

2013-11-22 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Hi Prashant > === > The EAL also supports an auto-detection mode (set by EAL --proc-type=auto > flag), whereby an Intel(r) DPDK process is started as a secondary instance if > a primary instance is already running. > === > > So does this mean that if I have a DPDK exe foo.out, then when I run the

[dpdk-dev] Query regarding multiple processes in DPDK

2013-11-25 Thread Richardson, Bruce
nal Message- > From: Prashant Upadhyaya [mailto:prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:08 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Query regarding multiple processes in DPDK > > Hi Bruce, > > One more question -- >

[dpdk-dev] How to know corresponding device from port number

2013-11-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> > Hi, > > I have a question about how to know corresponding device from port > number. > For example, if I have 4 Ethernet devices and 2 Ring PMDs, I will get 6 ports > during initialization. > In the case, how can I know which port corresponds last Ring PMD? [BR] Firstly, to identify the ring

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] compilation fixes for ICC

2013-11-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Compilation fixes for ICC ICC requires an initializer be given for the static variables, so adding one in cases where one wasn't previously given. --- lib/librte_pmd_e1000/igb_rxtx.c |6 -- lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c |6 -- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

[dpdk-dev] Question: Can't make pcap and refcnt to match

2013-11-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Hi Mats, yes, you are right, there is an issue in the pcap driver that it is not allocating mbufs correctly. We are working on a fix. Regards, /Bruce > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mats Liljegren > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:07 PM

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pmd_pcap: fixed incorrect mbuf allocation

2013-11-26 Thread Richardson, Bruce
The mbufs returned by the pcap pmd RX function were constantly reused, instead of being allocated on demand. This has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson --- lib/librte_pmd_pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c | 37 +-- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) d

[dpdk-dev] How to know corresponding device from port number

2013-11-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> If someone wants to implement forwarding application that receives > packets from ETH_A and send those to ETH_B. > Also above application is split to 3 processes like following. > [ETH_A]-->Process_A --> [Ring_A] --> Process_B --> [Ring_B] --> Process_C -- > > [ETH_B] (All 3 processes are impleme

[dpdk-dev] Sporadic errors while initializing NICs in example applications, dpdk-1.5.0r1

2013-11-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> > It's probably due to a frequency scaling. > The timer based is initialized when DPDK initialize and the CPU can change > its frequency, breaking next timers. > > The fix is to control the CPU frequency. > Please try this, without your patch: > for g in /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/

[dpdk-dev] Multi-process on the same host

2013-10-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen > Hemminger > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 5:39 PM > To: Walter de Donato > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Multi-process on the same host > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:47:02 +0200 > Walter d

[dpdk-dev] Issues on FDIR and multi-processes

2014-04-02 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mauro Annarumma > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 4:02 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Issues on FDIR and multi-processes > > Hi everyone, > we are working with Flow DIRector on a multiprocess app

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] test-pmd: allow command line selection of forwarding mode

2014-04-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Chemparathy > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 6:30 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] test-pmd: allow command line selection of > forwarding mode > > This commit allows testpmd forwa

[dpdk-dev] RTE_EAL on single core CPUs

2014-04-07 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Marc Sune > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:51 PM > To: > Subject: [dpdk-dev] RTE_EAL on single core CPUs > > Dear all, > > I was preparing a development machine (kvm - qemu) with a single core, and > stumbled w

[dpdk-dev] Using DPDK in a multiprocess environment

2014-04-09 Thread Richardson, Bruce
As a plan B (or C, or D, etc.) you could also try linking your primary process against those same shared libraries, even if they are unused by it. Hopefully that may have the same effect in the primary as in the secondary processes of adjusting your address space region and allow things to get m

[dpdk-dev] l2fwd not working on PF while working on VF

2014-04-09 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz K > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:04 PM > To: dev > Subject: [dpdk-dev] l2fwd not working on PF while working on VF > > Dear All > > I have a setup with Intel 82576 DPDK NIC. > For one of the availab

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/11 1/2] vdev: new registration API

2014-04-11 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 6:45 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/11 1/2] vdev: new registration API > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:18:08PM +02

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/11 1/2] vdev: new registration API

2014-04-12 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 12:03 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/11 1/2] vdev: new registration API > > On Sa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mem: add write memory barrier before changing heap state

2014-04-15 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:51 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mem: add write memory barrier before > changing heap state > > From: Didier Pallard > > a write me

[dpdk-dev] compiling with specific kernel headers

2014-04-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Monderer > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:36 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] compiling with specific kernel headers > > Hi, > > The target machine has a different kernel version than the

[dpdk-dev] VMDq + DCB: 128 Tx queues

2014-08-01 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sunil Bojanapally > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:13 AM > To: Liu, Jijiang > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VMDq + DCB: 128 Tx queues > > Thanks Liu for the pointer to function implemented in te

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: Reduce compilation to only require sse3 intrinsics

2014-08-01 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:49 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Neil Horman; Ananyev, Konstantin; Richardson, Bruce; Thomas Monjalon > Subject: [PATCH] ixgbe: Reduce compilation to only requi

[dpdk-dev] Question on using SR-IOV with dpdk apps

2014-08-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anjali Kulkarni > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 12:45 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on using SR-IOV with dpdk apps > > Forgot to clarify, this is a specialized app, and the first p

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: If build does not support sse4.2, emulate missing instructions with C code

2014-08-06 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 5:19 AM > To: Ananyev, Konstantin > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon; Richardson, Bruce > Subject: Re: [PATCH] acl: If build does not support sse4.

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 11/14] ixgbe: make mbuf_initializer queue variable global

2014-08-11 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:48 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 11/14] ixgbe: make mbuf_initializer queue > variable globa

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 01/14] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT

2014-08-12 Thread Richardson, Bruce
-Original Message- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:00 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 01/14] mbuf: rename > RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBU

[dpdk-dev] a NIC binding to igb_uio module of DPDK is down

2014-08-13 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wodkowski, PawelX > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:30 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org; Dpdk-ovs at lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] a NIC binding to igb_uio module of DPDK is down > > > -Original Message

[dpdk-dev] How to use dpdk ring and mem lib in kernel level?

2014-08-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of GongJinrong > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 7:10 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] How to use dpdk ring and mem lib in kernel level? > > Hi, guys > >Can dpdk support allocate mempool and create

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure

2014-08-20 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cao, Min > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:08 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure > > Tested-by: Cao Min > This patch modifies the mbuf data struct,

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure

2014-08-20 Thread Richardson, Bruce
lto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:44 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure > > Hi Bruce, > > On 08/11/2014 10:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > This patch set e

[dpdk-dev] next releases

2014-08-28 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Chemparathy > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:05 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next releases > > Hi Thomas, > > On 8/25/2014 10:15 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > H

  1   2   3   4   >