Hi Olivier, Sorry for the delayed reply. I haven't looked at those patches in detail yet, but from the description I imagine that those patch sets could then be put in following the mbuf rework that I'm looking at.
/Bruce > -----Original Message----- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:44 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure > > Hi Bruce, > > On 08/11/2014 10:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > This patch set expands and enhances the mbuf data structure. This set > > includes > patches previously > > submitted by Olivier to rework the mbuf, but takes the rework further than > proposed there. > > > > NOTE: This is still a work in progress! Feedback at this stage is still > > welcome > though. > > From the original series, I think the following ones could be > added in a second patchset, do you agree? > > dpdk igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation > dpdk mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag > dpdk testpmd: modify source address to validate checksum > dpdk mbuf: generic support of TCP segmentation offload > dpdk ixgbe: support TCP segmentation offload > virtio-net-pmd pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure > vmxnet3-usermap pmd: remove support of old dpdk versions > vmxnet3-usermap pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure > memnic pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure > > Regards, > Olivier
