Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Niclas Hedhman
OTOH, surveys is an interesting service, since it doesn't have to be maintained forever. As long as the output data is committed into source control, it can be taken down without consequence. Which is radically different from Wikis, trackers and so on... Cheers Niclas On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:47

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Ulrich Stärk
On 07.12.16 11:32, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/07/2016 11:29 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> On 07.12.16 10:26, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>> Hi Uli, >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that hopefully captures a more complete

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Rich Bowen
On 12/07/2016 09:15 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > Related (and, I assume, an easy fix for someone that knows the site > layout better than I) - I discovered that that link, taken from a > subpage (eg, from > http://community.apache.org/mentoring/experiences.html) is *relative* > rather than absolute, a

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Rich Bowen
On 12/07/2016 05:29 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > On 07.12.16 10:26, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> Hi Uli, >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >>> ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that >>> hopefully captures a more complete picture >> >> Instead of a survey, how ab

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Rich Bowen
On 12/07/2016 04:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Uli, > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that >> hopefully captures a more complete picture > > Instead of a survey, how about asking GsoC mentors to send a note here >

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Shane Curcuru
Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/7/16 5:49 AM: > Thanks for the feedback Shane! > > On 06.12.16 14:09, Shane Curcuru wrote: >> Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/6/16 3:59 AM: ...snip... >> Separately, are we allowed to (by GSoC rules), and would it be >> practical, to do a short survey for exiting GSoC *students*,

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Jefferson Silva
Hi community, I'd suggest to add a few questions to the questionnaire. - What problems did you face when you ranked and selected among GSoC applicants? (free text) - How many (estimate) hours did you take to rank and select among GSoC applicants? - How you would classify the relationship created

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Ulrich Stärk
Thanks for the feedback Shane! On 06.12.16 14:09, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/6/16 3:59 AM: >> Hi ComDev community, >> >> since I believe that measuring two data points only to measure the success >> of programs like GSoC in >> building communities is going to do more harm tha

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 12/07/2016 11:29 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > On 07.12.16 10:26, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> Hi Uli, >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >>> ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that >>> hopefully captures a more complete picture >> >> Instead of a survey, how abou

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Ulrich Stärk
On 07.12.16 10:26, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Uli, > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that >> hopefully captures a more complete picture > > Instead of a survey, how about asking GsoC mentors to send a note here > about t

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-07 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Uli, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > ...I want to propose a post-mortem survey that > hopefully captures a more complete picture Instead of a survey, how about asking GsoC mentors to send a note here about their GSoC success or failure story? We can send them your li

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-06 Thread Melissa Warnkin
e opposite, actually! :) ~Melissa From: Rich Bowen To: dev@community.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 8:49 AM Subject: Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey On Dec 6, 2016 6:41 AM, "Rich Bowen" wrote: Given that what I proposed was step one and you want

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 6, 2016 6:41 AM, "Rich Bowen" wrote: Given that what I proposed was step one and you want to jump straight to step 12, obviously I'm +1 on this. I'm told this comes across as a potshot at Uli. This is not my intent. This solution gives all I wanted and more. I approve of this solution

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-06 Thread Shane Curcuru
Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/6/16 3:59 AM: > Hi ComDev community, > > since I believe that measuring two data points only to measure the success of > programs like GSoC in > building communities is going to do more harm than good, I want to propose a > post-mortem survey that > hopefully captures a

Re: proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-06 Thread Rich Bowen
Given that what I proposed was step one and you want to jump straight to step 12, obviously I'm +1 on this. On Dec 6, 2016 3:59 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote: > Hi ComDev community, > > since I believe that measuring two data points only to measure the success > of programs like GSoC in > building co

proposal for a GSoC post-mortem survey

2016-12-06 Thread Ulrich Stärk
Hi ComDev community, since I believe that measuring two data points only to measure the success of programs like GSoC in building communities is going to do more harm than good, I want to propose a post-mortem survey that hopefully captures a more complete picture. Here is my first proposal, let