On Dec 6, 2016 6:41 AM, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
Given that what I proposed was step one and you want to jump straight to step 12, obviously I'm +1 on this. I'm told this comes across as a potshot at Uli. This is not my intent. This solution gives all I wanted and more. I approve of this solution On Dec 6, 2016 3:59 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" <u...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi ComDev community, > > since I believe that measuring two data points only to measure the success > of programs like GSoC in > building communities is going to do more harm than good, I want to propose > a post-mortem survey that > hopefully captures a more complete picture. Here is my first proposal, > let's discuss. > > Cheers, > > Uli > > *DRAFT* > > Please specify the name of the student you mentored (free text) > > Do *you* consider GSoC 2016 a success for your project? (yes/no) > > Why or why not? (free text) > > Do you feel your time spent was worth it? (very high value for time > spent:very low value for time spent) > > Did the student stick around after GSoC concluded? (yes and still is, yes > briefly, no) > > Has the student been voted in as a committer or PMC member (yes/no) > > Does the student's code live on? (as a separate module, as part of the > project's codebase, no, other > - please specify) > > Should we continue participating in GSoC on a foundation level? (yes/no) > > If no, why not? > > Would you mentor a GSoC student again? (yes, no, under the following > circumstances - please specify) > > Please specify your Apache ID if you would be willing to discuss your > answers further. (free text) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
