On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
>> go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
>> unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a f
On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions:
1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning
Roman
You aren't the only big data reviewer. I at least an in there. I think that
the apparent solitude is a matter of labels. I labelled myself as mahout,
hadoop and zookeeper. You said BigData. Same thing. Different words.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 19:31, Roman Shaposhni
Re: Question 2
It was previously stated that people should review anything they have an
interest in
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201401.mbox/%3cCAD6
VreuUk=a5ggc2rtbu9ekjhiufma4eoxr5q4ssau3xmtg...@mail.gmail.com%3e) so
hopefully people who are reviewing anyway will revi
Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions:
1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning (PST) tomorrow
and whatever is submitted is it. I
That's my understanding too. It should be easy enough to test this once i'm
not in an airport any more.
--
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Jan 31, 2014 3:30 AM, "Daniel Gruno" wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> > Out of interest do the speakers see the specific
On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
> reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
>
> Rob
As I understand it, speakers cannot see what reviewers write about a
talk, nor can you see what others write abo
Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
Rob
On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate
>more
>than that, email me. Or call me. I want
The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate more
than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect the
opinion of the subject experts.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> Since this is my first
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2014 12:53 PM, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
> >
> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
> >
> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
> will
> > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due dat
On Jan 29, 2014 12:53 PM, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
>
> As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
>
> The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications will
> be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of reviews?
As soon as possible. I dont have a be
Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
the proposal in our given areas or weight them
somehow?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> As I am quite new to this proc
12 matches
Mail list logo
