Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
Rob On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate >more >than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect >the >opinion of the subject experts. > >-- >Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com > > >On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews, >> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us >> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank >> the proposal in our given areas or weight them >> somehow? >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions -- >> > >> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications >> will >> > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of >> reviews? >> > >> > There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF >>presentations >> > -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific >> Apache >> > project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that >> > volunteered for reviewing, review them? >> > >> > Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the >> > decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it >>might be >> > advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers. >> > >> > ok, that's it for now... >> > >> > -- >> > >> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >------ >----------------- >> > Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice >> > >> > "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, >> > for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." >> > -- James Mason >> >
