The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate more
than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect the
opinion of the subject experts.

--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com


On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <r...@apache.org> wrote:

> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
> the proposal in our given areas or weight them
> somehow?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
> >
> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
> will
> > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of
> reviews?
> >
> > There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF presentations
> > -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific
> Apache
> > project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that
> > volunteered for reviewing, review them?
> >
> > Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the
> > decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it might be
> > advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers.
> >
> > ok, that's it for now...
> >
> > --
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice
> >
> > "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
> >  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
> >                                        -- James Mason
>

Reply via email to