On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions >> go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals >> unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions: >> >> 1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning (PST) tomorrow >> and whatever is submitted is it. I'll review the ones that fall into >> my domain and then I can go enjoy some nice Californian weather >> outside. Now, suppose we end up with more accepted talks than >> we have slots in the, lets say, bigdata track. What happens next? >> > > Based on the sum of the reviews, I'll need to make final selections. In > the events where it's not obvious what those selections need to be, I'll > come back to the folks who have indicated that they care about a particular > track, and clear my selections by you guys. sounds like a plan...I've "reviewed" items either related to my project or items I was personally interested in. > > > >> 2. Obviously I shouldn't be reviewing my own talks, but given that >> last time I checked I was the only volunteer in the bigdata space. >> What happens to those? Who will be reviewing them? >> > > There are a lot of people doing general "this looks interesting" reviews, > including myself. Hopefully this will result in an eventual clear picture. > If it doesn't, see above. > > Meanwhile, I presume that if someone submits a talk, they themselves think > it's a good talk. > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
